A Working Radiant Free Energy System

[AhuraMazda]

barbosi,
You have done some very interesting work.
How about this idea for testing your system:
take 2 similar batteries.
Discharge both fully.
Charge battery 1 for 30 minutes (or what ever you feel right). Discharge in to a known resistive load and record the results(result1).
Again, charge battery 1 for 30 minutes.
Charge battery 2 with battery 1 for 30 minutes.
Discharge each in to a known resistive load and record the results(result2).
If your second set of results show higher o/p than your first set, you have definitely made it.

Regards

AM

[barbosi]

A prety detailed site related to batteries, describing the *traditional* way to charging found at:
http://www.uuhome.de/william.darden/carfaq9.htm
Not very helpfull because we charge with pulses, not DC.

I tried reed switch device with different coils but transistor & coil heating,
...

The same here when I tried to remove also the magnet from configuration, and I used the NC contacts of reed. The coil was pretty much on DC, except for the moments the EMF determined reed to open contacts. Hence I switched back to NO contacts with the magnet. I know the circuits seem equivalent, but the results were different. The weirdness of these results make me think we are on something that at the moment I don't fully understand.
Also, related to the setup using the NC contacts, I tried to replace reed&mag with a relay, NC contacts in series with the coil => slef vibrating device to triger the current in the big coil. Although I used a miniature relay, the results were far worst than I expected.

...
How about this idea for testing your system:
take 2 similar batteries.
Discharge both fully.
Charge battery 1 for 30 minutes (or what ever you feel right). Discharge in to a known resistive load and record the results(result1).
Again, charge battery 1 for 30 minutes.
Charge battery 2 with battery 1 for 30 minutes.
Discharge each in to a known resistive load and record the results(result2).
If your second set of results show higher o/p than your first set, you have definitely made it.
...

The problem I have is I have VERY limited resources, so I try to take the most from what I have (no, I don't ask for money, instead I encourage everyone to make it's own system and post the test results along with personal observations)

I have a 12v battery and two 6V battery from an UPS power suply. The most relevant test I ran and is close to your test sugestion was:

2x6V batteries, 1x55w automotive light bulb as discharge load and the system.
1. fully discharged both batteries: aprox 30 min. down to 3V each measured with the load applied.
2. charged battery *1* to 6.12V
3. With battery *1* as power source, I charged battery *2* to 6.12V
4. fully discharged battery *2* to 3V measured with load applied.
5. using the same battery *1* (not recharged meanwhile) I  I charged battery *2* to 6.02V
6. at the end, battery *1* had 4.9V (brief measurement with the load applied)

Conclusion: I charged 2 batteries (one after another) using energy from one battery. Is this OU? I don't know. That was the reason to ask if I could measure the joules stored in battery, as a more accurate energy measurement.

If I recall, while I was playing with the 12V battery, the measurements at the power supply used to charge it were: 13VDC@37mA, coil and transistor cold at room temperature.

I'm curious if anyone else could duplicate experiment. Chances are the reed are different, coils are different, batteries are different. In these conditions can we find a pattern that would help understand:
1. if we have radian energy
2. what is the source (the magnet? sparks? both? other?)
3. how is captured (reed contacts in the glass enclosure? coil windings? both? other?)
4. improvents are the next...?...

Thanks.

[AhuraMazda]

2x6V batteries, 1x55w automotive light bulb as discharge load and the system.
1. fully discharged both batteries: aprox 30 min. down to 3V each measured with the load applied.
2. charged battery *1* to 6.12V
3. With battery *1* as power source, I charged battery *2* to 6.12V
4. fully discharged battery *2* to 3V measured with load applied.
5. using the same battery *1* (not recharged meanwhile) I  I charged battery *2* to 6.02V
6. at the end, battery *1* had 4.9V (brief measurement with the load applied)

Just to make sure, you need to charge the batteries based on a fixed time rather than relying on reaching 6.12 volts. Yes rely on voltage on discharging the batteries.

Regards

AM

[Bartolomeu01]

Dear Ossie Callanan,

I am currently playing with a Bedini SG which looks for the time being to have a very small FE, lost in the general bigger energy flows of the setup. So no clear overunity at the moment.

(Just as description of my SG: It is a 26" wheel with 18 magnets, coil with 2x900 turns, batteries of 12V/7.2Ah. I tried initially 2N3055 but after a first burn (I disconnected by hasard the second batery and I do not have a neon-bulb) I introduced an BUX85 transistor, which has U=450 V and not the SG works with it too.)
With this setup I have got from one pulse / passing magnet up to 3-4 pulses per magnet.

In order to understand better in which direction I have to improve, I am digging now on my own.

In this respect, I read recently your document  "A_working_radiant_free_energy_system", which is very interesting and gives hints not mentioned elsewhere.

After reading it, I have two questions regarding the described approach:

1. It appears to me that it might be possible to drive the base of the transistor (2N3055 or else) with a square wave of 1 - 2 kHz from a 555 circuit, during the magnet passage (which can be validated with a reed or Hall circuit on the opposite part of the wheel). In this way I get also the 20-50 pulses per passing magnet. Should this be an alternate solution for your reed-contact mounted on the coil ?

2. In another Bedini circuit (the one with three windings), a capacitor is charged with the pulses from the third winding and from time to time the capacitor is discharged into the charging battery. Can such capacitor (for instance a 15000 microfarad/100 V  or more) act also as "Radiant accumulator-converter" (instead of your reccomended dead batteries which I do not have) ?
I ask because this one is also a dipole, but I do not know if it is sufficient.

Thank you in advance for your advice and best regards.

Bartolomeu01

[bolt]

Go solid state. Some big clues here in John's circuit.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1998.0;attach=5877;image

Note the thyristor used to do the switching fed back to 555.

Incidentally the door reed switch used in alarm circuits often have the glass type reed inside them anyway just small one.

Rather then producing a single shot you are making a mechanical oscillator based on reed will operate much faster than a relay due to its small size. The relay may switch after the RE has already been and gone thats why is don't work.  Because the RE is produced in a time frame that can not be used to trigger a switching circuit it must be done by pure timing. This means trial and error of the mark space ratio so that when sufficient time has passed you switch on the triac to "see" if there is  RE to be collected. Do this hundreds of times as the magnet is passing and you should be able to collect even more than what a reed switch can do with better results. There is one tiny reason why this wont work though. The reed maybe producing a tiny spark and this stops electron flow dead in it tracks as Tesla did he tried many things to stop the flow as fast as possible. If your circuit needs a spark then solid state might not work.

Surely one must get close to producing a solid state design without mechanical wheels. What about a coil with a fixed magnet on the end then do the switching an see what happens?. As you said in your MS word notes all your coils hiss when reed and magnet is in the right place. Sounds like one hell of a good RF jammer though i bet your wipe out all the TV's and radios for miles

One thing i cant understand though why using 2n3055's in these old SSG type designs which are mostly well over 15 years old when surely modern power mosfets switch harder faster and easier without input current should show dramatic improvements. Having said that the 555 is almost 40 years old now! Crikey where does the time go?