Lords of the Ring

[joe dirt]

 

[kames]

Kames, I have one of those days..
Its about 10cm, and  it is not a simple coil, see attach

@ dani1
I think you are right. The last time I saw it was about 25 years ago. I can easily forget some details.
Would be nice to get one of those.

Kames.

[Motorcoach1]

@ gk heres the LMD circut i'm working on PDF file , if you notice the top ring has reverse rotation from the bottom on how i wound it and can be run on just 1 fet

[Motorcoach1]

@ Hartiberlin , some of the old Tv's had large capacitors so when you turned them off the 56K resistor bled the cap down. then soon after that , they made instaint on sets. that means the heater circuit went to a low setting to keep the tube warm for fast start up.  Now about that nasty shok LOL i had many ,hahahah but it wasn't untill the 70's that the electric code changed that grounds had to put on appliances and TV's. It's so funny that the engineres designed the sets with that type of bleed ground system and never put a grounded plug on the set mmmm . .... the delay in some sets had setscrew adjustments on both ends that looked like magnets or farrites also a balenceing resistors that may have been added to tune the set at the factory , these parts are not included in the schematics or Sams photo facts. that was before E frame gap transformers.

[kames]

@All
A few pages back (page 168) I have posted a simple and stupid experiment. Doesn?t look like anybody picked it up but sorry. Anyone can reproduce it with ease. There was a purpose to post it as a prelude to something else. I was thinking about opening a separate thread but as long as most of the people are in this thread I decided to post it here. It can be moved to a separate thread at any moment. There were several events that struck me when I performed that experiment. First, nobody could give a reasonable explanation. Second, I have found two patents in my unsorted files. Those two patents were backed up just in case a long time ago, before I even started looking for SM?s tpu. When I first time read those patents I decided ?old news?. When I recently read them again having all the stuff of the tpu in mind there were a lot of things to look over again. There were a lot of things to try to understand what SM was trying to tell from his every single message through Mannix.
I am in the process of testing those two patents. That is not a manual to how to do the things. Those are basic ideas and results.
The first patent (file name) I changed to ?power unit?. The second (file name) I changed to ?control unit?.
In the power unit the text is much more important than the drawings. Read it all. Don?t miss a single line. Drawings are not the same as what text is saying.
In the control unit, the drawing might remind you what you saw in the videos. It is just a nice technical solution.
I have scanned all the attachments from this forum and didn?t find anybody ever posted it before. Maybe I missed something. In this case, just disregard this post.
If you read these patents for the first time, come back and see what I posted on page 168. Any criticism or opinion is okay except for teaching me how to use a scope or probes or asking if I forgot to check my battery charge.

Again, I haven?t tested everything from these two patents. I am in the process. If anybody can get ahead, it is only better.

Regards,

Kames.