Lords of the Ring

[giantkiller]

In our basic thinking we believe that in order to have a bigger impact against a destination that we must use more power and that we, ourselves, must produce that power. How cro-magnon, eh?. Tesla proved over and over again that this is just not true. His patents have sparkgaps all throughout them. Why? He used the nuclear reactance of that explosion to do the work. And that, my friends, is the free part.
Just look at what John Hutchison does with 2 Tesla coils and a handheld transducer. He alters matters weight, location, and physical properties. Say 'What?'.

What if you don't have a spark gap? Extremely short, and I mean short, pulse widths with fast rise and fall times act the same way. The phase cancellation I achieved in the GK4 using square waves did just this. In my first tests I saw no sparks. And that is ok. The sparks are just a visual indication. I felt the kicks emminating from the coil. That tells me I have the virtual spark gaps from extremely short pulse widths with fast rise and fall times . The energy left the coil at an extremely high rate of speed. Faster than the copper could react so it shoots out to the next conductor that can handle that speed along one of the Poynting vectors.
Now the 3 frequencies I used were adjusted haphazardly and to certain electronic devices that could be construed as a confusing stream of intelligent protocol, noise at the right frequency. And thereby causing operational problems in the destination device. An EMP as a transmission and not as a power pulse. The magnetic pulse rides the radiant energy pulse like a bullet in a box car.

--giantkiller. It's extremely economical...

[Motorcoach1]

SM said there was AC in the Tpu , but wasn't sure where it came from. After much reading and and playing around with coils and magnetic Fields I've come to a realization. The TPU has what Steve calls bailing wire. the wire is wrapped in a horseshoe fashion ( U shaped or in the case of the TPU C shaped ), What happens here is the magfeild and current only runs through the wire and stops have way through and reverses (this is AC ) all generators work on this principal. I can see where this might be a catalyst in the operation of the TPU. Pulsing the magnetic Field will give you the AC effect , opposite the copper Field , this I call the pump effect. when the current is stopped in the iron field the BEMF is shot back wards and in doing this it pulls electrons from the copper Field and loss of flux creates a B Field @ 90 degrees. Bringing the current turned on in the Iron Field again fluxes the Field and in the copper Field the current starts flowing again (pump has occurred. then it repeats in each cycle, Kicks- if the kick is to high we just get big kicks nothing happens no flow or very little. the mag Field flux needs to be smoothed out so it is at the same flux path as the copper flux path in unison. now i can see why GK was talking about the gap in his experiments , I had said something about this way back in early threads but it may be moot as thinking it is a spark gap but think of it as an electron B Field starting point as it begins to form a chane the electrons at a slant (usually 45 Dr to the copper field , this is the Field out side and around the TPU - skin effect)  When Steve put a magnet close to the TPU the mag flux paths were 90 degrees to the coils and the small magnet changes the path so it flowed back along the length of the wire thus the flow started again in the right direction ( at some point when the TPU gets up to working energy the mag field sets up 90 degrees to the wire the magnets just reailines the path- Hot spot if not changed,  this is real evident in the LMD & TEM circuit -Tesla )  Yes GK i agree with you on the spark gap some electrons need to be realeased from the coils and a gap is a good way to control the runaway current. 

[Rosphere]

On another note I am working on the premise of the 'many small wires perpendicular to the coil' instructions. The 2 large copper wires are 12awg ground lines.

Wow, you went there.   

I thought of this many times but dismissed it for some reason.  Let us know how it works out.

[gn0stik]

Taken from: http://antigravitypower.tripod.com/exper3.html
Seems it explain the sucking effect of the explosion of the TV set told by SM.....
Regards,

Pegasus


ContraRotating Magnets
- Whitley Strieber -

RERERENCE: Book- 'Communion' by Whitley Strieber, 1987 pages 116-117.

(QUOTE)Here is the story he(Whitley's boyhood friend) recounted.
When we were 13, I apparently announced to him that 'spacemen' had taught me how to build an antigravity machine, which I was constructing in my bedroom. This was in the summer of 1958.

I do not remember the genesis of this machine, but I certainly remember building it. There was no magic to the thing; it was only an assembly of electromagnets taken from old motors. The supposed antigravity effect was based on a principle of counterrotation.(UNQUOTE). The machine destoyed itself on the initial test run.

(QUOTE)I (Whitley) have subsequently discovered that there is a whole mythology of flying saucer technology, and a lot of it revolves around the concept of counter-rotating magnets.(UNQUOTE)

...another man, who was given detailed instructions about how to build a motor of this sort...remembered the design in 1985... He built this design (contra-rotating electromagnets) and was able to start his testing. During the initial test, all the metal objects in his barn were instantly pulled toward the machine, and he was knocked out by a flying auto engine!

HOLY CRAP! I wonder what the second guy's name was.

[MeggerMan]

Hi Rich,
Whitley sounds like a last name not first name.
Its an interesting story though.

I have been thinking:
To create two counter rotating fields you could use two decade counters driven by two oscillators. The decade output could feed a mosfet driver, then mosfet.Ã,  The outputs from the two decades may need to be "OR"ed before they feed each of the mosfet drivers.
The mosfets drive the ten coils around the collector cables.

Ten coils should give enough resolution - small increments (36 degrees of rotation each).

If your two oscillators produce a sine wave output you could use a high speed comparator and potentiometer coupled to 10 AND gates for each comparator outout to create a variable duty cycle.
You may find the output from the decade is only active while the sine wave potential is above a certain level, but I would need to check the spec. sheets.

If the oscillators are closely match in freq. but not quite then you should get a second rotation occuring owing to the 2 x rotation collisions from the freq. offset. Maybe the collision rotation speed is important?

I'm playing with DDS function generators at the moment and they are amazing, forget messing with R-C oscillators these are something else.

DDS 20 from ELV shop in Germany:
http://shop.elv.de/output/controller.aspx?cid=74&detail=10&detail2=6325

Could do with some help from Stefan with the German translation of the user manual.
It has something called a "wobblefunktion" which I take as being the sweep function between two frequencies.

Rob