Lords of the Ring

[EMdevices]

yes I agree with you bolt, it's a sound concept used in radios and it could be 90% of how it works.

It's just that we talked about it before and that's why Grumpy is mentioning it.Ã,  I know there are so many posts to read through and I woudn't expect everybody to wade through it all.Ã,  Inevitably things will be repeated, and that's ok.

At least now you know that we agree with youÃ, Ã,  LOLÃ, 

EM

P.S.  good points about regeneration marco

[turbo]

it is also known that Lee De Forrest, the father of the audion triode, channeled with Tesla just before Tesla drove the car around and then De Forrest tried to patent the regenerative circuit but this was actually invented by Edwin Armstrong, resulted in a law suite which De Forrest won, but should not have won beacuse of Edwin was believed to be it's true inventor.
This makes the regenerative circuit even more suspicious when looking at the wooden box with tubes Tesla used.
He modified the tubes in his hotel room and somehow managed to tap what he called "the ethers surrounding us" and "unknown signals which we should be thankfull of their presence"

Marco

[Grumpy]

What's make the "deciphering of the TPU" so difficult is that ever possible means fo operation appears to be correct.

Let's get loose for a minute with the theoretical rhetoric:

Suppose you decided to make a "black hole" and pull in all of the ambiant energy around us.

We could start with a four-pole RMF arrangement, but you need something to give it that "depth", that "vortex" aspect.  Marinov and Boyce both perform this task with a DC-power solenoid around the ring. Marinov used AC, Boyce uses square waves - sequentially.

How could this be done with a three RMF arrangement?

Ah, Hell - let's go all the way to the damn edge of reason and insanity...

Suppose you have three rotating magnetic fields/collectors stacked on top of each other.

Now suppose that you start tuning the first (top) RMF until you see an output in it's collector.

Then you tune the second and third to match.

Now you have a kick-ass RMF but still no proverbial "vortex", so you tune the second to go a little faster than the first and the third to go faster than the second - but still harmonically related - fast, faster, fastest - in phase - ta-da - bitchin' RMF vortex.

I expect you would find an interesting relationship between these frequencies - perhaps even a particular arrangement that would blow the damn thing straight to hell and you with it.

[EMdevices]

Ok Guys,Ã, 

I used MatLab to simulate MIXING AND ADDING of two signals.Ã,  (Ã,  F1 = 10 Hz,Ã, Ã,  and F2 = 12 Hz. )

1)Ã,  Notice the Mixer produces the F2+F1= 22Hz and the F2-F1 = 2 Hz signals.

2)Ã,  The Addition operation produces the familiar BEAT which can be seen.Ã,  It is also 2 Hz, but look how much different the waveforms look!Ã, 

So in the future when you look at an oscilloscope you'll be able to spotÃ,  ADDITION and MIXINGÃ, operations.

EM

[Grumpy]

You get that exact mixing effect when a 60 Hz ac cord is near your probe - damn annoying.

Now, about that vortex....