Acoustical feedback energy system

[aleks]

Here are some basic schemes to generate sinewaves: https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/seven-common-ways-to-generate-a-sine-wave


E.g. 3.85kHz is very audible, but I think the best way to use planar piezo-elements is to attach them to both ends of some transparent tube of a suitable diameter, about 9cm long. Won't be as obnoxious. The length should be further adjusted by means of a glue or some padding so that soundwave from a piezo-element hits another piezo-element at 90-180 phase degree difference. This should theoretically create an aetheric DC potential on both ends, which can then be recycled back via schottky diode.


If I'm understanding correctly, if the system can be made to work (produce surplus energy) it's the only system that can be safely integrated into micro-electronics. Mechanical and electro-magnetic "perpetual motion" devices are not suitable due to interferences they cause. At the same time, for "large" energy generation, such devices like Liberty engine are already being made. For mobile phones the only way is to first try to make the outlined system work and then scale it down.

[Willy]

About demagnetizing magnets:
"With a strong enough magnetic field of opposite polarity, it is therefore possible to demagnetize the magnet whether this comes from another permanent magnet, or a solenoid."
https://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae472.cfm

So, OU devices based on drive by permanent magnets and having opposing polarity in the system with vibration will demagnetize eventually, may be in minutes or in years. For anything truly OU, a device without opposing permanent magnetic fields should be constructed, and the best approach is electro-acoustical devices I'm talking here in this thread. Piezo-materials would be the best as they produce and absorb soundwaves naturally, on crystal lattice level.

"For anything truly OU, a device without opposing permanent magnetic fields should be constructed"

A device doesn't have to be perpetually in motion in order to be O.U..
A device does not have to function eternally in order to be O.U..

[Willy]

This is an impressive demonstration how a well-tuned flywheel+magnet opposition creates perpetual motion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=As2LtGhuJ8g


Very simple DYI project. I would speculate the reason it works is that aetheric DC voltage is created in the process (of opposition) which powers the DC motors. Note the channel has many questionable videos, so this may be fake. Anyway, the idea of opposition I'm talking about is demonstrated well. It's hard to demonstrate acoustical opposition.

    That device doesn't work.
but thanks for the link to
https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/seven-common-ways-to-generate-a-sine-wave

[aleks]

"For anything truly OU, a device without opposing permanent magnetic fields should be constructed"

A device doesn't have to be perpetually in motion in order to be O.U..
A device does not have to function eternally in order to be O.U..

Don't get me wrong. If a magnet demagnetizes swiftly, it will be a part that has to be replaced. In a bigger scheme of things, this will require energy. So, I'm personally wary of any claimed OU devices based on permanent magnets.

[Willy]

For sure.

The magnets would under those conditions, would simply be a
novel kind of fuel.

Two neodymium magnets can be clamped together in opposition to
one another for a decade and yet experience very little demagnetization.

........  Note the channel has many questionable videos,  .......

Wouldn't want this to forum to fall into the same state of affairs....