Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[nix85]

nix85.
You have certain brain capacity and you discussing some good physics.
I assume you know that it is you, who is  pushing all of that nonsense.
But question  reminds open , why?
_______________________________

One of  possible conclusions is  that you are being paid for that nonsense by some troll  entity.
That would explain why someone decided to fly so low.
_________________________________
You had no chance to graduate with all of that BS  any college in Civilized Western World .
But  outside of it , yes.. you can become the same "PhD" like  Slobodan Andrey  .

Wesley

Honestly, at the same time, i highly doubt your brain capacity. Here you claim all these devices, call them FE or OU doesn't matter, are bunk, yet your channel is dedicated to promotion of those same machines. Who is the shill, who is the troll here, who is flying so low his face is plowing the soil and getting his mouth stuffed with dirt and worms.

Not to mention you never addressed the 4th law of motion etc.

I want you to address the 4th law of motion, enough of dodging.

[lancaIV]

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."

We are talking real energy GAIN, not some hypothetical machine that cannot be built.

  "The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."


                                   IT IS THE NON-PLUS-ULTRA SCALE : 100% ,also and ever for You,nix85


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/presse-und-medien/presseinformationen/2017/gestiegene-effizienz-feldtests-bestaetigen-potenzial-von-waermepumpen-als-wichtigster-heiztechnik-der-zukunft.html


                                their Maximum= IDEAL  orientation


Nicola Tesla,DAIKIN,PANASONIC/MITSUBISHI,CARRIER, and other inventive persons or companies ( in laboratory and market)




                                                        break-even
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://studyflix.de/ingenieurwissenschaften/energiebilanz-526


                                       external + internal energy researcher :
                                https://patents.google.com/patent/EP1841544A2


        description statement :


Therefore the ratio between the air kinetic energy to the air internal energy in this case is: 3,201.6/2,952,000= 0.00108,




                           
                                i.e., the kinetic energy is about one thousandth of the air internal energy



and this case is for the maximum operable air speed for the sophisticated 2 MW air turbine.
Weaker winds yield even smaller energy ratios.




centrifugal-boiler /     airpower turbine chamber direction flow : centrifugal or centipetal , ... and .... (turbulent and/or laminar) !?


                          Use of air ( edit: or other moveable medium) internal energy and devices


for Infinitysav max possible in/out results research,with oil as fluid,here air:


Wind kinetic energy can be expressed mathematically by this formula: Eκ= P X V X A X V2 /2


Where V is the air speed p is the air density


Surprisingly, natural wind air ( artificial oil flow ?)
has huge amount of energy (called "internal" energy) compared to its kinetic energy even at freezing temperature.
To realize this statement, one must look at equation of energy for isentropic compressible flow for a unit mass: CpT + V²/2=const (Eq. 24 Ref. Book P140)





Since the centrifugal force of the blade is: F=Jω² R dm,
G> is the rotational speed
R is the local radius of mass element of the propeller blade dm is a differential mass element of the propeller blade


The rotation speed of the rotor is an important factor to get high output power since the power is equal to the multiplication of direct force multiply by speed, i.e.: P= F x V.


Thus the air speed at the throat 114 is 221.9 FT/SEC, which is 221.9/21.737 = 10.2 times faster than the airflow speed at section 110.
Therefore we get airflow having 104 times more kinetic energy in section 114 compared to section 110.
This huge increase of kinetic energy is the major aspect of the invention.
Since no external forces was implied on the airflow in the nozzle, some of the airflow internal energy of section 110, i.e.: ΔTx Cp= (492-488.15) x 6000. has been converted into kinetic energy, i.e.: V²]_sll4/2 - V²] sπo/2= (221.9²-21.737²)/2 and this is the major aspect of the invention.






nix85,You will need and use this : https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/reynolds-number#:~:text=Reynolds%20number%20(Rn)%20is%20defined,L%20is%20a%20typical%20length.
by Infinitysav oil movement efficiency research


                                                         10.2 times faster


when 2 times faster = 8 times the output energy then 10,2 times faster .......


                                                    cube/inverse cube law

[nix85]

  "The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."


                                   IT IS THE NON-PLUS-ULTRA SCALE : 100% ,also and ever for You,nix85


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/de/presse-und-medien/presseinformationen/2017/gestiegene-effizienz-feldtests-bestaetigen-potenzial-von-waermepumpen-als-wichtigster-heiztechnik-der-zukunft.html


                                their Maximum= IDEAL  orientation


Nicola Tesla,DAIKIN,PANASONIC/MITSUBISHI,CARRIER, and other inventive persons or companies ( in laboratory and market)




                                                        break-even
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://studyflix.de/ingenieurwissenschaften/energiebilanz-526

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine."

You find that quote funny? Maybe you should do some more reading.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/carnot-efficiency#:~:text=Carnot%20process%20efficiency.,the%20heat%20transfer%20to%20occur.

"Fuel Cell Basic Chemistry and Thermodynamics
Frano Barbir, in PEM Fuel Cells (Second Edition), 2013

2.8 Carnot Efficiency Myth
Carnot efficiency is the maximum efficiency that a heat engine may have operating between the two temperatures (Figure 2-7).

"The Carnot efficiency has little practical value. It is a maximum theoretical efficiency of a hypothetical engine. Even if such an engine could be constructed, it would have to be operated at infinitesimally low velocities to allow the heat transfer to occur. It would be very efficient, but it would generate no power (Figure 2-8), and thus it would be useless."

Also, Carnot engine is by definition NOT an OU device. It simply means ALL input energy would be converted to work, but not more than input energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBCBAgSQAlI&ab_channel=UNSWPhysicsUNSWPhysics

OFC you keep pushing the unrelated shenanigans as usual.

[lancaIV]

   Okay, Also, Carnot engine is by definition NOT an OU device. It is exactly COP 1 device. 


                       
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ic2Cjw7kydI I am the SKAT-man in SKAT-mens world




            Mog net SKAT ! Und komisch,irgendwie "vorgefertigt" Ihre Antworten,nix85,zu schnelle Reaktion !


Fuet Di


OCWL

[nix85]

Not COP 1, how quickly you grabbed onto it like a desperate dog

Efficiency of 100% which is usually equated to COP1.

Again, we are not talking about heat transfer but heat (energy) generation.

Point being you, Scatman, claimed 8000% EFFICIENCY is 98% efficiency

Let's never forget that.