Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[nix85]

  How bout you read before posting. For russian expedition the quote i posted clearly says second expedition showed it's probably natural/volcanic and i wrote 'probably false alarm'..

Other reports like Azores pyramid remain undebunked and need further investigation. Sadly, these things end up suppressed.

Pepedeluxe attachment is not bs, i clearly wrote i am sharing it cause it contains a summary of how young Frederick Spencer Oliver came to ghost write this occult classic of unmeasurable value.

"Russian  propaganda" 

Speaking of science, you claimed (quoting official narrative), there is no power amplification in parallel RLC yet i have shown number of examples where we see clear power amplification in parallel RLC.

105W in 2.34kW reactive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVgp-gOBqsg

200W in 3.5kw reactive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sfOKPIi6CM

Etc

[nix85]

Here is one report fom late Jerry Decker about a guy in Waco, Texas in early 90s presumably who rediscovered a principle of universal degravitation, probably like 1000th person to do so since mid 19th century. Little box attached to 4 wheels of his Jeep made it buoyant. Of course, he refused to reveal how effect was produced (cause it so simple).

https://keelynet.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/a-tale-of-negative-gravity/

[nix85]

They wonder who put those granite slabs on top of the Teton mountain. Little do they know our Atlantean ancestors did almost 13,000 years ago.

"The top of the Teton, and for 300 feet below, is composed entirely of blocks of granite, piled up promiscuously, and weighing from 20 to 500 pounds. On the apex these granite slabs have been placed on end, forming a breastwork about three feet high, enclosing a space six or seven feet in diameter; and while on the surrounding rocks there is not a particle of dust or sand, the bottom of the enclosure is covered with a bed of minute particles of granite not larger than the grains of common sand, that the elements have worn off from these vertical blocks until it is nearly a foot in depth. This attrition must have been going on for hundreds and, perhaps, thousands of years, and it is the opinion of Mr. Langford that centuries have elapsed since the granite slabs were placed in the position in which they were found."

https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/grte2/hrs16.htm

[nix85]

Another valuable read on Atlantis but earlier period about 31,000 years ago, published by the Hermetic Brotherhood, Our story of Atlantis.

[onepower]

I thought this was comical...

Apparently some "experts" claim the stone work below was made with a wooden mallet and copper chisel. So how does one make a very long perfectly straight and narrow cut deep into hard rock with a fat, soft copper chisel?. Even a six year old has more common sense than to claim this was done with a soft metal tool yet that's the story.

Here's a clue, when considering the width and depth of the bore hole cut it can't be done. It would require a thin and long tool and if it was made of soft metal it would just bend and break. If it was a circular chisel then the surface area is too large and it would just flatten. If it was rotated we would need hundreds of tools to make even a shallow cut. I often cut concrete and even with a high speed water cooled diamond saw it's difficult.

It begs the question...are these supposed experts mental or do they just not know any better?. There nonsensical explanations are even more unbelievable than the fact the ancient Egyptians were even capable of doing this kind of work. What we do know is that the real experts who cut stone for a living in the present day say there no way in hell it was done with soft copper chisel.

Regards
AC