Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[onepower]

Nix85
Talk about Deja Vu...

I literally just stumbled onto this website as you were posting, lol.
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2020/02/russian-scientist-claims-earth-is-a-reserve-quarantined-by-aliens/

Thanks for the information, I will have to look a little deeper into this. Do you have any other good links to other websites on this subject.

Regards
AC

[nix85]

You're welcome. Like i said there is no end to this info but what is the point of sharing anything if people
don't recognize the truth in it and that is not easy with so much garbage out there. So it MUST be by one's
own research, one's own intuition that he comes to light.

If i have to pick one, i again pick Dweller on two planets.

Also these two documentaries, not everything in them is correct, i share them more for overall atmosphere.
and feeling they convey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FarNcfJ2Y3I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AxhW1g9HjA&list=PLIsDPbTTZpr2wh_Bi8TXkFoAM5kYjzAG6

[nix85]

There are many unanswered questions, too many, but we have to live with it. For example, most take transformers for granted

and stick with primary to secondary turns ratio determines the output voltage and current.

But consider HOW does the secondary know what's the number of turns, voltage and current in the primary.

ALL that secondary sees is change of flux in the core.

Point being this same change of flux, EXACTLY the same, can be produced by near INFINITE combinations of

1) primary turns of varying wire thickness
2) primary current
3) primary voltage

You will agree that for example primary with 10 turns and 1A will produce the same flux as primary with
5 turns and 2A. Secondary cannot "know" which one it is and there is theoretically an INFINITY of other
combinations that will produce exactly the same change of flux.

And yet it knows, the two scenarios will give different outputs despite same change of flux.

Another thing, if you feed primary of the transformer pulsed dc sinewave, it will convert each of
those positive half sinewaves into full AC sinewave on the secondary.

Yet, if you feed it AC sinewave it will also produce AC sinewave on the secondary. Do you see the difference.

For some unknown reason, when we feed it half sinewave (pulsed dc) when primary voltage reaches the peak
secondary voltage has already reached the peak and went back to zero and as primary voltage falls down from
peak to zero, secondary voltage makes another half sinewave of opposite polarity.

Yet when we feed it AC full sinewave on the primary produces half sinewaves on the secondary for each half
sinewave of the primary, not full sinewave.

It behaves differently for the two cases.

Similar thing happens when you swipe a magnet over an air core coil, as you pass over the left side say
positive half sinewave is induced, as you reach the middle voltage is 0 and as you pass the right side
negative half sinewave is induced.

Yet, if you have a single wire and pass a magnet over it you will get a full sinewave.

[nix85]

Here i am disclosing an old perpetual motion video i already shared here some time ago,
i think it's from some Russian guy (Russians really are BY FAR no. 1 in overunity),
forgot his name. I did not replicate it but i have no doubt it works. You sure won't
get kilowatts out of it but if you want a real overunity toy, this is a way to go.

As you can see yourself, it works because at any moment 6 or 7 magnets want to go
forward attracted by the sloping iron, and only 1 or 2 want to stick.

I am not sure if the base is iron sheet or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me0s25_Xbnc

If you build a successful replication, feel free to share here.

[nix85]

...