Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[nix85]

I knew you're gonna jump at spring thing, it was the issue from day one
this video was published, some jumped at it claiming spring cannot convey
torque, which is ofc nonsense, but whoever made that observation i agree,
looking at the direction of the spring, it is going CCW from the supposed
generator toward the magnet motor, however, indeed, if magnet motor was
driving the supposed generator spring would be unwinding, so obviously fake.

Another thing, notice most of the magnets in the supposed motor are missing.

This one was just a side example, now removed from the playlist. I'm not gonna pick
another one, i already said as you know well that high power examples are Perendev
and Yildiz, both of which already have many many threads about them here.

And Luling ofc.

[nix85]

Since all this talk of magnet motors, i may also remind of Wankel motor with electromagnet to get past the sticky point.

Or Flynn motor

"A motion producing device using permanent magnets as the source of energy.."

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5254925A/en

[alan]

https://youtu.be/Vo2-Qb3fUYs   
https://youtu.be/HOVcinQ-7TQ 

Magnetic fields are conservative so good luck making a perpetual motion runner, it will find a balancing point and stop. Pushing it beyond the barrier costs energy, which is maybe more than what's delivered by going around

[ramset]

Nix
I did not pick that video
It was headliner when I went to your link


And yes obviously ( now once members comment was shared)
A big issue with credibility!!?


And here you present these things as evidence
Calling members who question....? defamatory names and such


Please remember this is global forum
With many members all over planet


We have offered ( still do) many times to witness claims in even very remote places
Members here volunteer to go to places close to them !




Actually the guy in link above ( spring issue guy)was approached for demonstration (was crickets as he had been caught)
Unfortunately many many many ( 3 many's still understatement (probably 1000milliion ?) of these guys try to get money from wishful ,hopeful ,desperate persons!
Or clicks/hits on YouTube
—-//—//::


You mentioned others above ( more famously presented..but still no ??
Independent replications






Yes we are the choir of believers
We need to be respectful of each other and not violate forum etiquette
And
AND
Also be aware it's not our first summer ...we have builders with decades
Of experience ( half century and more in some cases)


All sciences and fields Globally
Open source is a huge asset ...


We need tolerance...screaming ( or insults ,accusations ,etc ...makes no point Except ( assumed weak
Argument!


PLEASE!!
Respectfully
Chet k
Ps I will call some builders as mentioned
One even had some knowledge of Luling ( not sure spelling)

[nix85]

I picked it as example of high power one, now we know it's fake.

I don't know why you're pushing with magnet motors when all has been said,
and this is not a thread for it.

I said 3 times already, of high power ones i know of Perendev, Yildiz and Luling,
all have multiple threads here going back many years. I don't know of any replication.

The thing is they are very delicate as most OU systems, it's easy to fail.

On the subject if OU success is hard, i'd say it's either impossible or very simple.
It's always like that, someone fails and fails for years, clearly, it's impossible for him
then finally succeeds and says it's so simple. Yes, it is from that perspective of acquired
knowledge and experience. But before it it was not hard it was IMPOSSIBLE. So again
it's either impossible or very simple, no betweens.

Sure there are fakes, youtube is full of them and they are usually very easy to spot.

I'd ask you to stop pushing for magnet motor, there are Yildiz, Perendev, Luling and
other threads specifically for that.