Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[ne0]

Your tactique is

1) call it a deception or strongly imply so
2) insist on my replication or nothing
3) repeat repeat repeat

People are not stupid they see what you do.

I am showing concrete KEY principles while
you are jumping around, derailing with lies and bs.

You continue to pretend to beg for a solution, asking for a build
yet when shown clearly real obvious gain mechanims you call it
"deception" have you no shame.

Let's focus on the second vid, we can see the old guy lift this
74lb 33kg weight dozens of times with his pinky.

If that is not OBVIOUS ENERGY GAIN what is.

Are you calling video a montage, a CGI or what....

If not, how do you explain that he lifts that big weight so many times and he could
clearly do it for 20-30min cause input energy is so tiny while output is AT LEAST
11-12 times more.

[ramset]

Nix
There is a huge reason that you do not get enuff attention ( a following)
Of builders !
First the fights ... true builders here would prefer their fingernails pulled before engaging in such atmosphere!
2nd


Persons who build and share results get respect of open source community ,


Persons who see overunity at every YouTube?
And tell others to "build it " you'll see ?
It really is amazingly naive!
A rabbit hole which will consume years of life chasing ??( nothing OU at all)




I have not yet looked at any of videos you posted as it is your bench endorsement
The community seeks !
We have had years of lives wasted on such unproven assumptions


Do you have replication of any flavor?
Personal experience
"I did this it works"
Or is this where we end ?


I have no time for such bouncing around


Pick one
Anything
And I will be sure to get the needed input ( will bring hundreds of years combined experience to your bench !


Stop playing games !
It's not a game
And for clarity
It will be 100% transparent process !


Scientific rigor will apply !

Respectfully
Chet K
PS
Who has the captains paddle?


Kolbacict
Quote

Что вы на моего Веслика нападаете


End quote

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8

few things:
1. pendulum as lever action
2.  resonance (will be covered later if needed)
3. energy concentration (will be covered later if needed)

re  1.
Quote from comment under video :

ibpointless2
10 years ago
You have to push the counter weight over ten feet to move the heavy weight two inches, this is clearly use a lever action.
You can lift a car with a big enough lever but it does not mean its free energy.

Quote:
howsybee
14 years ago
Let's analyse this video a little closer.
If the 46-pound pendulum was released from a 90° angle the centrifugal force could lift a maximum weight 3 times the pendulum's weight = 138 pounds.
With the bar ratio of 1.41:1 the pedulum could still lift a weight of 98 pounds.
Now, with a max. angle of approx. 77° as shown in the video, the pendulum could lift 76 pounds at the bottom which is roughly the left weight.

https://youtu.be/X9zLgWfYcXI?t=167
Wesley

[ne0]

Of course just the same sleazy filth, personal attacks, dodging, distracting, injecting skepticism...

He accuses me of "fights" yet all he does is fight,

while he avoids the concrete subject like a hot iron!!!

Now he uses the idea of "community" against me, just same dirty tricks over and over again...

Look how SLEAZY this is....

Persons who see overunity at every YouTube?
And tell others to "build it " you'll see ?
It really is amazingly naive!
A rabbit hole which will consume years of life chasing ??( nothing OU at all)

So i am "naive" just cause i can see, as do thousands if not millions who know this principle is OU,
around the world......and he tries to make it look as if i am trying to make people waste their lives
on something which is "nothing OU at all" (his words).

But it IS OU no matter how that hurts you and i am not suggesting anyone to build this
relatively primitive OU device, i am just sharing for those who are still not aware of it
to SEE AND UNDERSTAND IT, to know that YOU ARE A LIAR, that OU has been proven
long ago, it is already used world-wide.

Question is WHY are you still denying this unquestionable OU principle, what is your agenda,
or rather, how much are 'they' paying you for this (no matter who 'they' is).

I am building other stuff, i don't have to build this one to know it is OU, so many already have
and confirmed it, they all agree you can keep the pendulum oscillating with your pinky,
while energy due to big falling weight is many many times the input beyond any doubt.

And STILL he refuses to admit, he calls it "deception". WHY, what is this.

It is not a game but it is a DIRTY DIRTY game YOU play.

Stop playing games, admit the obvious or explain CONCRETELY why you claim
this principle which has been proven to be at least 11-12x OU, which so many
of us world-wide know to be true, is "deception" according to you.

[ne0]

Look how stivep sleazily tries to confuse and distract people from the fact
that energy in is MANY times smaller than out.

Energy gain is due to combination of centrifugal force and gravity through lever action,
that is quite obvious. But input is definitely many times smaller than output.

There is

Force = Mass * acceleration
Work = force * distance moved  unit: newton meter or joule or Work = Mass * Gravity * Height
Work = Change in Energy
Power = work / time = force * displacement / time = force * velocity
Power (hp,watt) = work(ENERGY)/time aka time rate of energy transfer
Energy = Power x Time

So work done is proportional to mass x g x height it drops from.

If you lift 74lb aka 33kg vertically say 5 or 10 cm and drop it energy you input lifting it
will be equal to energy released as it impacts the surface.

Now, how much energy do you have to invest to lift 74lb aka 33kg just once,
we all know that is significant weight, doing it just 5 times would start to tire anyone.

How bout doing it for half an hour non stop, every 2 seconds.

And here we have a device doing exactly that, yet input is literally just maintaining
the swinging pendulum with slight pinky pushes.

DO YOU SEE WHAT HE'S DOING; HE'S TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU ENERGY IN = ENERGY OUT.

He is literally calling you morons.