Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[stivep]

...

1. You have problem with  understanding English language:
    Who is helping you with writing?

_Example1:

Wesley says: For physics God doesn't exist . {In more elegant form I'll say: - Physics doesn't recognize God.)

a - Please read  the first two words: "_{For physics}"
b - construct mental picture of  a sense of the sentence.
_Conclusion:
It is the physics that doesn't recognize  existence of  any spiritual models that are based on believes.
Your personal position to this particular subject in question is never mentioned in my  comment.
___________________________________________
_Example2:

Wesley says: And for Darwin - you are just an animal - a mammal to be exact

a. - Please read  the first three  words: "_{And for Darwin}"
b  - construct mental picture of  a sense of the sentence.
_Conclusion:
It is the  Darwin  evolutionist, that doesn't recognize  you as a human - in any other form but only:
- as an animal  that belongs to group of animals known as mammals.
<sub>Action:
You may disagree but than you will not graduate, unless you say that  :
- according to Darwin you are  an animal</sub>

___________________________________________________

Belief is good   

physics is not based on beliefs but on models. If model doesn't works for us  we throw  it away as we  did with  Ether/eather.
We don't have believes in physics - we have predictions
A prediction is: a statement that we make about the future.
___________________________________________________

I never used term difficult as there is nothing difficult in nature except for the one who makes it so for himself, usually due to ignorance.   

You nix85 used  the wording:

"subtle subjects."

Answer:
I gave you definition of word: subtle
_{"subtle" : everything that is so delicate or precise as to be difficult to analyze or describe}.
_{.encyclopedia.com/literature-}
-but   how could you  understand it if you don't  know how to process logic of English language.
___________________________________________________

You proclaimed yourself a physicist for 30 years,

Tell me the truth nix85 - who does the reading for you?

_Answer:
This is what I wrote:

_Answer:
Here is who I'm:
https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558293/#msg558293

Position in human horde  is affecting you as an animal and  your influential status.
https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558293/#msg558293
____________________________________________________________________________

And yes
I'm in physics for more than 30 years now.
- but one doesn't exclude the other.
___________________________________________________

Summary:
I do respond  to your comments from the position  of social respect.
You didn't provide  firm answers  having a solid, almost unyielding surface or structure.
You are acting  like... like a dog  jumping around  and trying to find any chance to bite .
I'm not your enemy,
But how  do you know that?


Wesley 

[nix85]

1. You have problem with  understanding English language:

No, Wesley, you do.  Even tho i'm non native speaker, my English is way better than yours, sentence structure, terminology and overall expression, not to mention how scattered and chaotic everything you write is.

_Example1: a - Please read  the first two words: "_{For physics}"
b - construct mental picture of  a sense of the sentence.
_Conclusion:
It is the physics that doesn't recognize  existence of  any spiritual models that are based on believes.
Your personal position to this particular subject in question is never mentioned in my  comment.
___________________________________________
_Example2:a. - Please read  the first three  words: "_{And for Darwin}"
b  - construct mental picture of  a sense of the sentence.
_Conclusion:
It is the  Darwin  evolutionist, that doesn't recognize  you as a human - in any other form but only:
- as an animal  that belongs to group of animals known as mammals.
_{Action:
You may disagree but than you will not graduate, unless you say:
-that according to Darwin you are  an animal}

___________________________________________________

If you were not taking things so literally, so black and white, you would've looked at the context, just 2 paragraphs below i make it very clear that material physics is inferior to Spiritual Physics. Physical instruments can measure only so much, especially those of mainstream physics. If we take into account those of the black projects, then such science is much closer to REAL science.

The very reason mainstream science is so limited and in big part flawed is for this materialistic approach, which we see slowly reverse in quantum physics but still their models are flawed missing the simpler all encompassing model, similar to which i touch upon in one of previous posts.

physics is not based on beliefs but on models. If model doesn't works for us  we throw  it away as we  did with  Ether/eather.
We don't have believes in physics - we have predictions
A prediction is: a statement that we make about the future.

I never said physics is based on belief (altho ultimately this whole reality IS based on belief and is fundamentally imaginary, unreal), belief is a transitory phase, once one has done enough research and work in particular area, there is no place for belief.

Just because you limited yourself to what big boys say, mainstream narrative, it only shows your lack of discernment, there is a whole another, REAL science happening parallel with mainstream, that did not dismiss ether, overunity, or gravity control, Keely, Hollingshead, Zirbes, Bearden being just a few in a long chain of great ones whom you SHOULD'VE but you didn't study.

In his 1921 monograph Sidelights on Relativity Einstein states:

"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity, space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists Aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without Aether is unthinkable; for in such a space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time. (measured rods and clocks), nor therefore any space intervals in the physical sense."

You nix85 used  the wording: ________________________________________
Answer:
I gave you definition of word: subtle
_{"subtle" : everything that is so delicate or precise as to be difficult to analyze or describe}.
_{.encyclopedia.com/literature-}
-but   how could you  understand it if you don't  know how to process logic of English language.
Tell me the truth nix85 - who does the reading for you?

Here are few synonyms for subtle: fine, minute, precise, elusive.

Subtle is indeed a great term, subtle energies are exactly what we are talking about, finer forms of energy, elusive for those who don't know how to extract/resist them.

Again, one great example being etheric rainmaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwhu2G2p2sM

One of us really has trouble understanding English, i'll give you a hint, it ain't me.

Answer: [/sub]
This is what I wrote:And yes
I'm in physics for more than 30 years now.
- but one doesn't exclude the other.

So much uncalled for rant. Ok you did not say you are a physicist, but "in physics". Excuse mua, such a great difference.

Isn't it sweet how you did not even address the 4th law of motion and inertial propulsion or etheric rainmaking, you, with such "great" experience in physics.

Summary:
I do respond  to your comments from the position  of social respect.
You didn't provide  firm answers  having a solid, almost unyielding surface or structure.
You are acting  like... like a dog  jumping around  and trying to find any chance to bite .
I'm not your enemy,
But how  do you know that?


Wesley 

I doubt you can understand the concept of respect.

Compare this or my last post to your last posts, mine with no personal attacks, no name calling, yours full of angry, aggressive rhetoric, personal attacks, demeaning paraboles...so who is "like a dog  jumping around  and trying to find any chance to bite". Look in the mirror, Wesley, boi.

No Wesley, you are not my enemy, you are your own worst enemy.

[stivep]

There is nothing  to quote from your comment.
1. you expressed your opinion.
2. you addressed Ether, Spiritual Physics....you have rights to your opinion.
3. I was never aggressive,  but you have rights to your opinion.
4. I never  assigned myself  into being or not being  a physicist as titles and ranks are not important here.
    -moreover  I don't need you to attack me based on a  position in human animal horde you belong too_{. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/human/
Answer:}

<sub>Here is who I'm:
https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558293/#msg558293

Position in human horde  is affecting you as an animal and  your influential status.
https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg558293/#msg558293</sub>

No matter how many times I repeat that  you can't get it right.
____________________________________________________


5.  Mentioned by you .
In  Sidelights on Relativity Einstein :

page 9.

The ether does not exist at all.

https://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Einstein/Sidelights/Einstein_Sidelights.pdf

page 10

The  special  theory  of relativity  forbids  us  to  assume  the  ether  to  consist  of  particles observable through time,

page11

From  the standpoint of the special theory of relativity, the ether hypothesis appears at first to be an empty hypothesis.

page14

According  to  the  general  theory  of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would
be no propagation of light

but:

But  this  ether  may  not  be  thought  of  as  endowed  with  the  quality characteristic of
ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time.
The idea of motion may not be applied to it.   

Explanation of word:
- ponderable : having appreciable weight or significance.
- ponderable media :  are all ponderable bodies that are constantly in motion in through space
    and consisting of parts which may be tracked through time.
____________________________________________________
Summary:
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg558116/#msg558116
3 points in time  belonging to the same frame of reference. - the plane
explains that  in 1916 science started to build new model for General Relativity
and later on that model was improved  rejecting totally Ether/Eather due to
development of new form of analysis.
The statement of Einstein  was among many other statements  not yet corrected to its present form.
You are referring into frozen point time in that particular book.. but you not taking to the account the improved by science
Model of General Relativity

Wesley

[nix85]

No one cares about your titles, i simply referred to your supposed 30 years of physics experience yet, you are ignorant of even the most basic mechanical principles like 4th law of motion, let alone the true mechanics of the time-space.

There is much to quote but you are dodging anything that doesn't suit your little worldview.

For start, address the etheric rainmaking and inertial propulsion.

"The  special  theory  of relativity  forbids  us  to  assume  the  ether  to  consist  of  particles observable through time,"

Yet mainstream physics is perfectly fine with concept of virtual particles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

Vibration of ether CREATES time and time creates space.

First of all ether is not made of particles. There are no particles, anywhere, anywhen, there are just waves. There is just one infinite forcefield made of vibrations of infinite frequency and amplitude bound by secondary vibrations of finite frequency and amplitude which create interference patterns along 6 axis of time, time is AC, it just oscillates "in place", it never moves. Each matter-antimatter universe picks up oscillations in opposite directions, thus matter-antimatter timelines flow in opposite directions.

3D space is created by imaginary angle between 6 time axis

"The angle of 60 degrees could only be created by an apparent frequency shift maintaining the harmonic vibrations of the rotating field."

In other words, this is the very root of relativity, REAL relativity, from perspective of each of 6 time axis, nearby axis appears to oscillate at 1/2 it's frequency altho they are exactly the same. This allows perception of depth and consequently illusion of 3D space. Time is first, space second, it is time-space, NOT space-time.

https://galactic.no/rune/iarapdx1.html
http://www.resona.nl/Denaerde/denaerde.html

Michelson–Morley experiment is nonsensical, we already experience motion of ether as gravity (and antigravity). Within a gravitational bubble, local reference frame, only direction the ether moves is from all sides toward earth center and back into space in another form, gravitational bubble being polarization of ether.

With appropriate apparatus you could detect motion of ether spiraling around the earth all the way to it's boundary just beyond our Moon and then back to the poles.

Earth "falls" in Sun's vortex, neutral energy piles up along the leading edge (equator) and makes the planet rotate which produces the differential of neutral energy between the equator and the axis which in turn makes neutral energy spiral from the equator toward to poles, in same direction (toward east) on both hemisphere, this develops Earth's own vortex which repels the parent vortex due to C+ speeds in the outer layers of the magnetic field which shear and release energy in form of expanding bubbles of nothing. Whole universe works like this, from smallest subatomic "particle" to entire cosmos.

Natural principles are simple, for those with eyes to see.

[nix85]

If you want to read the full FALLING BODIES THEORY by Zirbes, i upload a book which is not so easy to find any more.

Zirbes and his team performed great number of experiments with gravity in an abandoned mine 2000 feet deep by throwing balls of various metals in various configurations and photographing and measuring the time of impact for each.

One experiment in which a sphere of iron and a sphere of graphite of equal weight were simultaneously dropped down. Amazingly, the graphite sphere, although considerably larger than the iron sphere because of its lower density, and therefore prone to more wind resistance, impacted when the iron sphere was still six feet from impact. A similar experiment using spheres of other metals revealed that the iron sphere still impacted later than all the other spheres. Moreover, the spheres diverged considerably from each other prior to impact and also developed a specific rotation when falling.

https://www.mediafire.com/file/93ywxfxh71p7jz7/zirbes.pdf/file

http://www.rexresearch.com/zirbes/zirbes.htm