The Aether versus General Relativity

[ramset]

Notrino? ( news


Here a nice woman wonders why ? ( physics is  getting more holy ...(lotsa holes


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p118YbxFtGg


Respectfully
Chet K

[Floor]

Not just face book but all social media has some of these characteristics.
i.e.  "Us" versus "them" bull crap

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Lx5VmAdZSI

[onepower]

All we really need to understand about GR/space-time is that the people who invented it have a little secret they didn't want most people to know. It was Richard Feynman who basically let the cat out of the bag in my opinion.

The dirty little secret is that the only explanation they have for a field is "virtual particles popping in and out of existence from multiple parallel universes". Which is comical because 1)they have no proof of there claim, 2)it has no basis in nature or reality and 3)it's even more complex and unbelievable than any Aether theory. Most people have never heard this explanation before because the GR people don't like to talk about it. Mainly because it's almost impossible to give this explanation and not come off as a complete nut job.

The Aether theory also falls in line with what we see happening in physics. The better microscopes we build the more we see on a smaller scale. We just keep finding more particles smaller than the last ones with no proof there is a limit. Not unlike the universe and the more powerful our telescopes the more stuff we see and again there is no proof suggesting a limit or end to it. Therefore the proof we do have is pointing towards more particles and smaller particles... an Aether.

We should also keep in mind that everyone keeps saying particles cannot get smaller nor the universe bigger and they keep getting proven wrong. At least Albert Einstein had the integrity to admit he was wrong about his GR/space-time theories unlike most of his followers. Of course Einstein bathed in all the glory, fame and fortune for decades and it was only near the end he came clean and admitted he was wrong, well played Albert.

There were also a great deal of very powerful interests behind Einstein and his theories. In the early to mid 1900's Aether theory was very popular and it seemed like new free energy devices were being invented on a weekly basis. The air was electric with countless new energy technologies popping up all over the place. However as Tesla noted, some very powerful men were backing Einstein and once his theories took hold any talk of free energy basically disappeared.

Which begs the question... who had the most to gain by disrupting free energy and replacing it with a nonsensical theory based on space-time?. Obviously the oilmen as well as Morgan/Westinghouse and other electrical businessmen but there was another party in the background. Who had the most to lose from an Aether theory which could allow anyone to "create" matter/energy, to transmute the elements or achieve antigravity and other god like powers?. Indeed, many powerful interests had a great deal to lose in more ways than most can imagine. As we know, the most dangerous kind of person is an independent free thinking individual because they have little fear and are very difficult to control.

This is why when I see everyone zig I tend to zag..

Regards
AC

[Floor]

All we really need to understand about GR/space-time is that the people who invented it have a little secret they didn't want most people to know. It was Richard Feynman who basically let the cat out of the bag in my opinion.

The dirty little secret is that the only explanation they have for a field is "virtual particles popping in and out of existence from multiple parallel universes". Which is comical because 1)they have no proof of there claim, 2)it has no basis in nature or reality and 3)it's even more complex and unbelievable than any Aether theory. Most people have never heard this explanation before because the GR people don't like to talk about it. Mainly because it's almost impossible to give this explanation and not come off as a complete nut job.

The Aether theory also falls in line with what we see happening in physics. The better microscopes we build the more we see on a smaller scale. We just keep finding more particles smaller than the last ones with no proof there is a limit. Not unlike the universe and the more powerful our telescopes the more stuff we see and again there is no proof suggesting a limit or end to it. Therefore the proof we do have is pointing towards more particles and smaller particles... an Aether.

We should also keep in mind that everyone keeps saying particles cannot get smaller nor the universe bigger and they keep getting proven wrong. At least Albert Einstein had the integrity to admit he was wrong about his GR/space-time theories unlike most of his followers. Of course Einstein bathed in all the glory, fame and fortune for decades and it was only near the end he came clean and admitted he was wrong, well played Albert.

There were also a great deal of very powerful interests behind Einstein and his theories. In the early to mid 1900's Aether theory was very popular and it seemed like new free energy devices were being invented on a weekly basis. The air was electric with countless new energy technologies popping up all over the place. However as Tesla noted, some very powerful men were backing Einstein and once his theories took hold any talk of free energy basically disappeared.

Which begs the question... who had the most to gain by disrupting free energy and replacing it with a nonsensical theory based on space-time?. Obviously the oilmen as well as Morgan/Westinghouse and other electrical businessmen but there was another party in the background. Who had the most to lose from an Aether theory which could allow anyone to "create" matter/energy, to transmute the elements or achieve antigravity and other god like powers?. Indeed, many powerful interests had a great deal to lose in more ways than most can imagine. As we know, the most dangerous kind of person is an independent free thinking individual because they have little fear and are very difficult to control.

This is why when I see everyone zig I tend to zag..

Regards
AC

"All we really need to understand about GR/space-time is that the people who invented it have a little secret they didn't want most people to know."

"The dirty little secret is that the only explanation they have for a field is "virtual particles popping in and out of existence from multiple parallel universes".

To discuss the universe in terms of an Aether, is to say essentially the same thing
as that there are virtual particles.

Any  Aether that existed, WOULD also BE a kind of "parallel universe".

"All we really need to understand"
"The dirty little secret is that the only explanation they have for a field ...."
"Which is comical"
"We should also keep in mind"
" they have no proof"
"We should also keep in mind that everyone keeps saying particles cannot get smaller nor the universe bigger and they keep getting proven wrong."
"Which begs the question... who had the most to gain by disrupting free energy"

Your,     we and they     speeches sound like those of a propagandist, and like most
propagandists you demonstrate that you understand almost nothing of what you
speak of. 

Your most common theme is a divisive one of us versus them, black and white thinking.

We the free thinkers and so on   and   they that deny free energy and so on.

When we allow our selves to fall into that kind of black and white thinking,
we are not free thinkers. 

That is small minded thinking and one stuck within it, would be among the first to
sell out ANY cause that could bring freedom.

Fear is their master, and freedom and free thinking terrify such a person.

So let us keep a vigilance so as not become as such small minded persons.

        best wishes
                  floor

[onepower]

floor

When we allow our selves to fall into that kind of black and white thinking,
we are not free thinkers.
That is small minded thinking and one stuck within it, would be among the first to
sell out ANY cause that could bring freedom.

I'm simply pointing out that it's one thing to have a belief but quite another to take action which attempts to inhibit others freedom and beliefs.

I believe Tesla and many other great inventors had free energy and it was based on an Aether theory. This obviously represented a danger to others vested interests and wealth so they attempted to bury it. As I implied, an independent free thinking individual has little reliance on others or there beliefs.

Many are starting to understand that anyone who profits from us is not really our friend. This can easily be proven by telling them we will not give them another dime and seeing what happens. Try going to your church, local politician, place of business, or utility provider and telling them they will not get another dime. You will soon find yourself an outcast perceived as the enemy and see how quickly the attitudes change. I have done this experiment many times and watched as the person falsely claiming to be a friend turned into a monster before my eyes. You see... real science works.

So we should understand most of modern science is as much about money, greed and control as anything. Nobody wants us to be truly free or independent of them because there's simply no profit in it. However we could note that Tesla often spoke of true freedom and independence which was why the powers that be destroyed him and buried his work.

Your,     we and they     speeches sound like those of a propagandist, and like most
propagandists you demonstrate that you understand almost nothing of what you
speak of.

That is small minded thinking and one stuck within it, would be among the first to
sell out ANY cause that could bring freedom.

Fear is their master, and freedom and free thinking terrify such a person.

You are wrong, I am not a propagandist I am a realist and an inventor.

The science is pretty clear and when a person runs out of facts or valid arguments they often resort to gaslighting or attacking the person as you have. I have determined that others independence and freedom is in my best interests. Individual freedom and independence from others beliefs takes away from monopolies and the mob mentality which is in all our best interests in my opinion.

Regards
AC