Hmmm, Can A Hydrogen Fuel Cell and Generator Be Enhanced?

[Johnsmith]

We would try to divide carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide into chemical elements for a start.
Liquid or gaseous. These substances are electrical insulators and it is much easier to create
the field we want in them. If  work it out , you can  start it for a  water. 

  I checked out hydrogen sulfide and it might produce H3O (heavy water). And with CO2, it can be separated
into positively and negatively ionized molecules. And knowing this, in the electrolysis generation of hydrogen,
could H2O steal an electron from CO2? If so then this might provide a means to lower the cost of generating
hydrogen. With a naturally ionized gas, it would save the cost of generating ionized gasses.
This is when I wonder because of how stable CO2 is if that might explain it. Does CO2 have a covalent bond
without being bonded? If CO2 can be used to improve the efficiency of hydrogen generation, you
will deserve a loft of credit.
What I am wondering is if negatively ionized CO2 is in the same field, will half of that field generate 2 electrons
each? This is what Maxwell's Demon is about. It's a thought experiment that is thought to have no solution. Yet
how does a generator create electrons? Einstein's father and uncle were into dynos (generators) among other
things. Einstein wanted to know what propagated the motion of light.
And kolbacict, most people wouldn't consider CO2 because of how stable it is. With hydrogen sulfide, highly reactive.
But CO2 would offer a controlled reaction if it works. And with Occam's Razor, fewer reactions are better.

p.s., for those not familiar with chemistry, if 1 electron introduced into H2O starts a reaction, then if a positively ionized CO2
molecule is present, would that CO2 molecule give up its extra electron because no negatively ionized CO2 molecule is present?

kolbacict, this is something that is worth considering. A naturally occurring electron lowers the cost of generating an electron.

[kolbacict]

Why so many words ?
I just wanted to say that carbon dioxide is a worse conductor of electricity than water.
Just divide pure carbon dioxide into atoms with a resonant alternating electric field,
as it did (probably)  Meyer with water. 
And hydrogen sulfide in general is similar to water, sulfur and oxygen are elements of the
same group. Only the binding energy in the molecule is less, and therefore it is easier to
break it apart.

[Johnsmith]

Why so many words ?
I just wanted to say that carbon dioxide is a worse conductor of electricity than water.
Just divide pure carbon dioxide into atoms with a resonant alternating electric field,
as it did (probably)  Meyer with water. 
And hydrogen sulfide in general is similar to water, sulfur and oxygen are elements of the
same group. Only the binding energy in the molecule is less, and therefore it is easier to
break it apart.

  I haven't heard about Meyer's work. Any chance you can provide a link to it?
With what i said, to allow CO2 to be separated into +CO2 and -CO2, it would need to form
a double covalent bond where they share 2 electrons. This would mean that at any given
moment they can switch from + (positive) to - (negative ionization).

[kolbacict]

I haven't heard about Meyer's work. Any chance you can provide a link to it?

[Johnsmith]

I happen to like your cat pictures. In American, I think they're pretty cool. I like atmospheric chemistry. I actually hope
to change the field. With CO2, it takes a radioactive energy or greater to break its bonds. With such emissions, there
are Beta and Gamma emissions. Radioactive wave energy and radioactive He2 which is helium.
This would be consistent with radioactive decay and Einstein's E = MC^2. This is where with what you mentioned, what
chemical reactions are allowed for? And with Occam's Razor, the process with fewer chemical reactions should be
considered first. This is for better or worse what helps to develop a baseline for other observations.
This means that CO2 should be considered first even though its heat value is greater that hydrogen sulfide.