Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[nix85]

Hi !   
       Lenz's law does not interfere with obtaining free energy , The Lenz force can be used to compensate for energy costs.
       https://overunity.com/18539/minimal-lenz-generator-v2/

      And if you create additions to Lenz's law, then you can build electrical machines on a new principle of operation.
      https://overunity.com/15307/lenz-free-generator/msg564776/#msg564776
     The Lenz force vector can be 180 degrees.  The received energy can contribute to the reason for which it arose. 


             regards Boris
       
       

I don't know if you're replying to me, but lenz does very much interfere with OU, it is the greatest obstacle and as all here and in conventional community know bypassing the lenz directly means infinite energy.

Now, as i said in first post here "Either there are PMs in the secondary coils or there is phase shift, delayed lenz, or he is using bucking coils in some configuration."

So there are methods to make primary not "see" the lenz or see it much less and the OU becomes possible.

[alan]

How then do we bypass Lenz, or the backemf (flux linking induction) or backtorque (motional induction) it causes: by simulating motional induction with non-moving parts. This is what Holcomb is doing and Figuera was the first.  Lenz will always appear inside the coil according the right-hand rule, but it won't go through the input coils and cause backemf, decreased impedance and thus increase in current, because of the geometry. (ideally, if it works)

[nix85]

There are many methods as all here know since there are million threads about this.

I'd say Daniel Cook was the first, he was playing with something like bucking coils,
he was experimenting with magnetism for 35 years before he supposedly got his
OU device etc, he said there are 8 orders of interaction in it as current rebounds
and interferes with itself...

As for Figuera i also believe he was using N to N to bypass lenz altho patent says NS.
My intuition tells me this is one of solutions, compressing the fields and producing
induction with minimal movement, be it mechanical or solid state.

[alan]

yet the team is still looking for the demonstration and confirmation of a single one. 
Cook, Sweet, Figuera, MEG, Holcomb, Hooper, all are using the same mechanism but differently.

[bistander]

...
You only need 4 mosfets, one for every n and s pole,
and don't forget a diode so you not fry your mosfets with the back emf.

Good points.
Also, having equal current flow in opposite direction at the same time in the same slot is wasteful because the sum contributes nothing to magnetic excitation. Therefore the same end result can be had exciting only one coil in the set of four at any instant, saving more than half of the resistive loss.
bi