Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

Sometimes old theories don't explain everything.

https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/energy-from-vacuum/the-source-charge-problem.html
https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/energy-from-vacuum/em-waves-imply-curved-spacetime.html

Feb2006,

Well, they may not describe everything but we've done pretty good, and gone a long way, with them so far!

Always open to new theories and ideas but the source should also be considered as well - for example:

From the "Free Energy Planet" - About Me and My Blog

I am Jeff Sheets and I own and write for Free Energy Planet. It all started when I was still studying in college,
way back when blogging was still some online journal to write your rants and raves about (think it's still that
way, only more refined). I created blogs whenever I felt like and deleted them the moment I became bored.
Free Energy Planet is my personal blog so I write articles that mostly interests me, like blogging, writing, life,
society and culture, books, and personal development. I'm also an opinionated person so you would definitely
find me sharing my point of views here, there, and everywhere in this blog.
Please contact me if you have any questions, or if you just wanna talk or fight or something.

Think I'll pass on this "Free Energy Panet" blog for now!  - Lots of references to paid books, etc. but no
real "meat" so to speak; unless there is something burried in the blog somewhere.

Paul Dirac (Dirac equation - Nobel Prize in Physics 1933) might also be a good read with respect
to "The Source Charge Problem."
SL

[Feb2006]

I only meant those two pages, not the whole blog,
"Bearden:Energy from the vacuum - concepts and principles" are hard to get hold of nowadays.


And the pdf I downloaded as a preview from the authors webpage it's not the whole book but
all the theoretical stuff.

The Dirac equation it's the Matter part of "The theory of everything (so far)".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVQfWC_evg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only those who atempt the absurd can achieve the impossible." Albert Einstein

[rakarskiy]

As you all re-enter the Lenz Law discussion circle for the umpteenth time, review this 16 Apr 22 post
from OUR (reposted below) while keeping in mind all these Laws are related and interact in one form
or another.

https://www.dataforth.com/faradays-law-of-induction.aspx

.............................................................

SL

I am just considering issues that are considered to be unshakable, but you are at an impasse with them. I refine them and add details that the design specifically missed.

For example, there are other views with which I also partly agree!

https://www.veritasium.com/videos/2021/11/19/the-big-misconception-about-electricity


By the way, the force of magnetic attraction cannot possibly be the Lorentz force. If you look at it, this is the derivative of the Ampere force in reverse order. All magnetism is compared with electromagnetism. Yes, they have an interaction, but this dadeko is not the same. Just answer the question why does a permanent magnet have an active field, without an external source? Science has no answer to this question, for that the answer is in another, the magnetic field is more primary than the electric one.

PS If you look at Holcomb's designs, he did not reveal the secret of electromagnetic induction, he imitated a mechanical generator. Figuer's secret is not revealed by Holcomb.

Sincerely.

[alan]

Why discuss Lenz? 
Because it is this law that enforces conservation of energy in induction systems.

"Lenz's law is a consequence of the law of conservation of energy. The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed, but it can be changed from one form to another form. Lenz's law states that the direction of current is such that it opposes the change in the magnetic flux."

If we want OU we have to know what we are doing and understand what we are trying to change. I think the secret lies in motionless "motional E induction", see Floyd Sweet "Nothing is something", also see Hooper, Moray and Graneau.

What is LinGen?Is it the same as that patent posted before? https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f1/73/db/bddc31a19a8100/CA2357550A1.pdf

[alan]

Does Bearden's MEG work?