Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

AC,
I think Ampere's Law (with Maxwell's correction) has your concerns covered.
My feeling is that folks often take *ampere turn* too literally without a grasp on Ampere's Law actual meaning.
But let's keep on topic, or 'in hand'.
bi

[rakarskiy]

AC,
I think Ampere's Law (with Maxwell's correction) has your concerns covered.
My feeling is that folks often take *ampere turn* too literally without a grasp on Ampere's Law actual meaning.
But let's keep on topic, or 'in hand'.
bi

Oh, this is already the right direction "Ampere's Law"! Or rather, the creation of an electromagnetic force, which certainly has a magnetic induction parameter in its module.


https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/p/ampere-force.html

[kolbacict]

Here is my  current today device.
The field rotates, three phases 200 Hz.
At the inner anchor, the power is very small.
the incandescent lamp does not light up. The LED lights up.
The gap between the stator and the rotor is too large than I wanted.

[bistander]

Hello kolbacict,
Please show us how the coils are wired, both inner and outer cores. And also, are you able to excite the primary coils to or near the rating for the wire gauge?
Thanks,
bi

[onepower]

bistander

I think Ampere's Law (with Maxwell's correction) has your concerns covered.
My feeling is that folks often take *ampere turn* too literally without a grasp on Ampere's Law actual meaning.
But let's keep on topic, or 'in hand'.

I think my post was on topic because it concerns the process in the Holcomb device.

Amperes Law does not recognize a non-uniform current which can produce non-perpendicular field lines and traveling magnetic fields within any given current loops. This is where the laws most presume to understand start breaking down producing a different result.

As well many have become so preoccupied with textbook theory they forgot how to think and solve problems. For example, we can have a single current loop where one side of the loop has more current flowing in it than the other side. For many this is inconceivable and they cannot imagine how this is even possible but it is. By the same reasoning we could also have many parallel conductors in hand with a common termination having different currents.

This phenomena should sound familiar because a similar process occurs in shaded pole devices. Shading, meaning to impair/change some part of the movement of a magnetic field change by using a shading coil to periodically oppose said movement. The alter ego of this process is implied above whereby the current in one part of a conductor can change with respect to another part of the same conductor.

I get it, it sounds impossible but impossible is relative to our understanding. More impossible than what, a free energy device?. 1000 years ago almost everything we know today was considered impossible so again it's relative...

Regards
AC