Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg569625/#msg569625

SL

The theory of a transgenerator or a solid-state generator (as you like), is calculated even on such simple software as FEMM.
Your problem is the lack of basic concepts: what is EMF and how does it work correctly. What is written in the textbooks will lead to a dead end.
Secondly, you have not understood what a magnetic conductor is and how it is identical with an electric current conductor.
All this so-called "closed code" on the surface, bringing it into a logical chain is engineering technology.

You trusted the program too much, and the program considers what you put into it.

Good luck to you.

[seychelles]

NIGHLIFE EVERYTHING IS IN A SPIN. ALL MATTER IS A MASS OF SPINNING ELECTRONS PROTONS QUARKS ZIBARTS AND THE REST.
MAGNETIC FIELD IS ALWAYS IN A SPIN OR ELSE IT DOES NOT EXIST. IT IS ALIVE. ALIVE I SAY TO YOU. SO TO GET TO FREE ENERGY
ALWAYS APPLY A SPIN IN YOUR GREAT INVENTION. CERTAIN MASS LOOK STATIC BUT INSIDE SPINNING. GRAVITY IS DUE TO ALL ELECTRONS AND THE REST OF MATTER SPINNING COLLECTIVELY.

[stivep]

you are not alone there. He's awfully quiet

Please understand that I'm not against Holcomb nor ANY OF HIS SUPPORTERS INCLUDING  SolarLab.
I never criticized Holcomb.
As long as your writing obeys laws of physics I have no reason to complain.
I'm peaceful, person friendly to everyone including SolarLab,
All I need from critics, is to respond to my writing   with direct scientifically recognized arguments,
but like most of you, I don't want to be attacked, called names, however there is no problem to challenge me,
by a  gentleman .

If you want to withdraw from discussion it may only say that, you have nothing to offer, contribute
and you want to turn it  into a punishment of the forum, showing them:
-how much they are losing,
-how valuable you are,
- how much you could deliver, but now you will not.
For me it is an escape from  public criticism, negative feedback.

Your decision SolarLab  is yours not mine.
I wish every nation,  and you personally, the best.
Re: Wesley's  Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum « Reply #3750 on: Today at 02:48:45 PM »
Wesley

[Jimboot]

Let's all stay on the build here, there is a theory thread setup for those that wish to discuss. My last comment was purely about ufo  progress not anyone else. He had the best results so far. Good luck all

[onepower]

stivep

As long as your writing obeys laws of physics I have no reason to complain.

That's kind of a loaded and ambiguous statement in my opinion...

Almost all of the physics community is in agreement that the Primary Fields (Electric, Magnetic and Gravic) are defined as "virtual particles popping in and out of existence from multiple parallel universes" relating to Einstein's space-time. This mainstream view could even be considered as a law of physics since all the real physicists agree this must be the case considering the proof they know.

As such if the current "laws of physics" demand all fields must be made of "virtual particles" popping in and out of existence and said "popping" qualifies as energy then anything is possible isn't it?. Unless of course you know more than the physics community does or feel the need to clarify or interpret what they have said or mean.

So let's be clear, in almost every case when an average person say's "the laws of physics" what there usually referring to is there own interpretation of it. In the real world every real physicist believes the Primary Field's which dictate the action of everything thus all energy is dictated by "virtual particles" which exist then don't. Why said particles have even been proven to exist in two places at once as a superposition of states sometimes defined as a mixed state... oh dear that's a problem.

Which begs the question which laws of physics your referring to?. Apparently the real physicists actually employed as a physicist and who have even won a Nobel Prize claim almost any particle can appear and disappear and be in more than one place at once. In this respect the Holcomb device seems pretty boring doesn't it?...

Regards
AC