Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

bistander

I've been reading and reviewing diagrams of that recent patent. I'm not sure Holcomb uses distinct magnetic circuits. Reason why I inquired about doing FEMM. Thanks SL, and others who commented, but now I know my "tools" are totally inadequate.

And, just kinda odd, latest version in patent shows no center shaft. Inner 'rotor' with inner & outer slots, stator, second 'rotor', and another stator. With some sort of bearing/bracket to rotate one of the members, for position tuning. Wonder if he'll see torque on it???
bi


Jimboot

Quote from: citfta on August 09, 2022, 05:36:26 PM

I agree.  Been using Linux for over a year now with no reason to ever go back to windoze.  I am sure there is an equivalent program for Linux as many academics and professionals use Linux.  I'll see what I can find.


Carroll
Some of their apps are available for different Nix flavours. https://www.ansys.com/content/dam/it-solutions/platform-support/previous-releases/platform-support-by-application-2019-r1.pdf

SolarLab


OT - F.Y.I. example: [Win10 stand alone - $280US complete]

Amazon - HP EliteDesk 800 G2 Business Desktop Intel Core i7 6700 3.4Ghz 32GB DDR4 RAM 1TB SSD Hard Drive Win10 Home (renewed).
Can take 64GB RAM. Nice machine - got them all over the lab (12+). Good for off-line as well.  Neuter Win10 for better experience.
More than adequate IMHO.  Networked, these beat the WorkStations and only about 30W each (Z80x WS is 1200W). These are well built!
$ 280.08 - Monday, Aug 15.
https://www.amazon.com/HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-Business/dp/B07XDCCP38/ref=sr_1_18?keywords=hp+elitedesk&qid=1660095147&sr=8-18 

Or this one, (not familiar with this type) Dell OptiPlex 9020 - same as above but older graphics [4600 vs 530 intel] - check specs carefully!
$247.00 - Amazon DDR3 RAM says it an older intel chip - they don't say what the i7 is.
https://www.amazon.com/Dell-OptiPlex-Computer-Processor-Bluetooth/dp/B092KLDZ6B/ref=psdc_13896617011_t1_B07XDCCP38


rakarskiy

And why did you decide that the larger the program, the more accurate it is?
Do you know exactly what the magnetic field looks like and how it works from the current of the phase laid in the groove?
Before something can be modeled in a problem solver, the program must be given the correct initial conditions for the solution.
Secondly, you need to know for sure that the algorithm for solving the set goal is correct.

For the formation of EMF, a stable rate of change of a constant and evenly changing magnetic induction is important.

That is, the formula E=BVL should be written as E=(B/dt)*V*L, where V (speed) must be a constant and L (conductor length) constant.

In this case, the speed in time also has a vector. The EMF generation process is more complicated than you might think.

For example, the program shows me one thing, as it contains a traditional mathematical algorithm, and the graph on the oscilloscope monitor is different (this is exactly what I saw).
And the most interesting thing that the oscillogram shows does not fit in with what the EMF formula declares in terms of the sign of the EMF itself.

**********************************************
;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYQ1xThupNQ&t=26s

alan

If BVL results in E [V/m], then (B/dt)VL results in E/t, [V/ms]