Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[alan]

Interesting document, thanks or sharing! 
I think the explanation of atmospheric charges is wrong, it's explained as regular induction but without back-torque. 
Inside the center coil both input coils induce an N field, but one grows and one shrinks, this way it's emulating movement of a magnet, so power is induced by motional E instead.
Forget Holcomb, try this     
No need for a special signal, one current must in crease, the other decrease, but the direction must create N towards the output coil. A linear current of di/dt is determined by V_L/L, so just flip a -/+DC voltage, but current must remain positive. 

edits

[rakarskiy]

Hello
Yes, the author, who seems to be from Argentina, makes a good interpretation of the patents in Spanish, however, knowing that the obvious question will be "where does the excess energy come from", he accepts the articles published in the newspapers of the time as true. USA and especially to one of the correspondent in Cuba of the New York Times, in which he ironically refers to its atmospheric origin, something that days later Figuera himself categorically denies, however in my opinion he did make certain that the coils induced have an air core.
Cheers

I don't think that Figuera patents, which are freely available, have real data about the "zest" of his design.
If the "system" wants to hide something, it will hide it by slipping something that will be taken as true, but will be a lie.

[Jimboot]

off topic posts from our fisherman friend removed.

[rakarskiy]

Hello, I see that this thread also talks about Clemente Figuera, so I decided to send this excellent work by Julio C. Gobbi, in my opinion the best interpretation of these patents, where he reports, among other things, of coreless induced coils, and where a mathematical approach is also given.

https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Engineering/Download/8688

Cheers

It remains unclear how, at low costs, 1.3 Tesla was obtained in the excitation core, already at the core pole the field will be equal to 1/2 Bm, how did this value manifest itself in the penetrating power vector of the detachable coil circuit? The formula gives just such a sense of induction. If the authors operated with numbers, then the full solution would be viewed.
The second, Counter magnetic fluxes on one conductor, will not induce anything, from the point of view of EMF. The argument based on electric fields is just an assumption, even if it is, then the static field must become vortex, and in the case of this combination, the transformation of static into vortex electric field is not even disclosed, and even if it is possible, in this case .

[phoneboy]

my mistake