Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

nix85
https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578723/#msg578723

You did not convince me, since I was previously an adherent of this particular theory, I even developed a system of calculations for verification. But it turned out to be nothing more than mathematics. For that I got a very good practice, "what's wrong here." I struggled with this for a long time, when I myself came up with how it works, I found others who went in this direction.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mHOgWWpmCxG8JMIktZYakVRy_Z6YkCh-/view
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hoopmnst.htm
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331628227_An_Alternative_to_Classical_Electromagnetic_Theory

You can believe in anything, I do not forbid you. But you don't know how a traditional synchronous generator works.
Good luck!

[rakarskiy]

One whole lamel divided in two ?
прикольно. I had not seen that yet.
And it becomes whole only when covered brush.

It may be a hint how to organize the switching of a solid state static electromagnetic rotor for a generator, in a series connection of a group of electromagnets.
But this is just an engineering decision of switching
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8629588B2/en?oq=8%2c629%2c588 
https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2004140991A/ja


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9vShtCx3yvQnWPU5EIgrErf55foKvTKNnS_QqA7Al2keCNqcgS9jcdQy9PErx0NEYYnc1DrYqaveimEgEs6tPRCAYR3fdTcj4pO7xEWZAxiPEmpy7gjfgwDV_1l3juxXGYZGEo8goa_ah3Fn-weLOjLAmnBoFjtmS81FOvCjOTpI8dRDfZ-cpvJtU/w595-h357/2022-10-22_121342.jpg

[Jimboot]

Last post removed for name calling and insults

[nix85]

Bad moderation has been reported to Stefan. And this is not the first time he does it.
Everyone could see there was no "name calling and insults" in my reply to rakarskiy.
There are gatekeepers on this forum but that is nothing new. And since i did not back
up that reply now i have to type it again. To recap.

Point is not to convince you but for you to realize you are wrong and learn. You say you
were "previously an adherent of this particular theory". What "theory". Most of what i
shared are concrete facts including Aharonov–Bohm effect which was proved in 1960.
and everything else, not "nothing more than mathematics" but well established principles,
and as for flux cutting vs flux linking you said yourself they are different phenomena, and
now you disagree with the "theory". Make up your mind. And if you want to dismiss
something be concrete.

You did not come up with how it works. You don't even understand induction properly which is shown
in your linking of HOOPER-MONSTEIN Experiment. Like i wrote before, i was considering writing
about it the other day to show how not understanding induction leads to flawed conclusions.

In short, when two opposite fluxes approach the wire from the opposite sides as in HOOPER-MONSTEIN
Experiment they are aiding not canceling out as claimed. By lenz law wire generates
a field which spins in same direction as the approaching flux, as shown in diagram below,
it repels the incoming fields on both sides.

YOU can believe in anything, I do not forbid you. But YOU don't know how a traditional synchronous
generator works. I know how a traditional synchronous generator works far better than you.

Good luck!

[kolbacict]

Discussion  Holcomb's device going to cul-de- sac ?
There are still my two untested ideas, to speed up the rotation of a pseudo-rotating magnetic field by magnetic transmission. And rotate this field faster than the speed of light.
I have not been able to confirm the first. And  to check the second is not real to me at all.