Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[ramset]

Being a moderator is a difficult job
Here only builder's can be moderators ( those who share their work open source for scrutiny)
Jim is such a person ,
  His decades long example of investing his time and resources ..and sharing his efforts open source (in this and many other projects) make him an exceptional example to the FE open source building community!
And Jim has also given his time here to help sort forum issues,


The personal investment ( by Jim and other replicators here) mandates a certain level of respect to the moderator and his standards for the topic .


Flamewars all too often derail topics!
As a matter of fact entire topics have been removed by Stefan do to this tendency ( in unmoderated sections of forum)


Tremendous gratitude to Jim and others who build and share !
As of this moment there is no one posting in this topic who can contribute a self running device
That runs with gain For scrutiny!
( if there is please correct me and share )


Perhaps Jim ( or other open source builders) will be the inspiration for the first open source self running device,( batteries or wall outlets  not included) for replication !
I know he inspires many other builders!


Respectfully
Chet K

[nix85]

I give you a hint, this experience is directly related to understanding the operation of the synchronous generator and the Holcomb system itself. Raselli1's experience is the same (video link in posts above)

I'll give yourself a hint. Linking the pdf with basics which you don't understand, and referring to synchronous generator and Holcomb which you as well don't understand, to cover up your ignorance is epitome of irony.

Understand how induction works. I explained it already but you are stubborn. Your ego refuses to be corrected. Like that you will never learn. In HOOPER-MONSTEIN Experiment induction happens in normal manner, not only in 1 but 2 ways (both wire cutting flux and flux changing through a loop).

Read again

"Altho you did not explain it clearly, supposedly what you are trying to say is that fluxes will merge above and under the wire, so supposedly wire will cut no flux, but you forget since they are at equal distance from the wire, wire is always their point of intersection, in other words, before they merge wire cuts the fluxes."

And, like i also wrote, in addition to this, once the fluxes merge, loop sees increase of flux in one direction, also causing induction."

.....

There, snake tongue cames out, as usual, sleazy sleazly act, fake tears, fake words of support to hide badly covered dark agenda, poison carefully packed as cure. Nothing new. Good moderator is one who does not have double standards. Jimboot has double standards and as such deserves no respect altho i did not disrespect him, i only reported him to Stefan for bad moderation. Nowhere did i one bit name call or insult rakarsky as he claimed when he deleted my post for no reason, everyone saw my post which i repeated today, i only wrote that rakarsky is wrong and does not understand induction which is true. In fact it is exactly rakarsky who DID namecall and insult.

Everyone can look back exactly what, rakarsky first claimed there is a generator where wire does not cut flux. When i asked him to name such generator, no answer. Instead he started to play some sleazy games, to accuse me that my theory is obsolete, that i don't understand synchronous generators, of course he was talking about himself. Then he brought up the HOOPER-MONSTEIN Experiment which only proved he does not understand induction. Again he refused to be corrected but continued to play sleazy games, adhominems. And he continued to insult "This can be vtyuhat, only a completely illiterate passer-by in this matter.", again talking about himself....but that is all "fine". Like i said, double standards. The MOMENT he refused to answer the question, to name the generator where wire does not cut flux, if JB was a good moderator he would've said, "wait, you made a claim, answer that clearly, don't play dirty games". But no. WTF is that. Not to mention later when he refused to admit HOOPER-MONSTEIN Experiment is flawed altho i clearly explained to him and proved induction is happening normally in that experiment and not only in 1 but 2 ways (both wire cutting flux and flux changing through a loop). The other day pix corrected me about high permeability flyback transformer, everybody saw i immediately admitted my mistake. WHY some cannot admit their mistakes here, and WHY is so called "mod" not doing anything about it.

And now this professional actor and possibly a payed shill again implies i started a flamewar, altho it was rakarsky who started it. Now i know perfectly well and have known for quite some time NdaClouDzzz was right. I could not agree more. There are indeed gatekeepers here, they are EXTREMELY sleazy and organized. But Stefan is not as blind to inflitration of his forum as he used to be. We are entering higher octaves of 4D, all who are of the dark agenda will be revealed for what they are.

Also nothing more ironic than non-builder talking about building. And one who contributed the most is one who illuminated people the most, gave actual KNOWLEDGE in all areas, conventional and overunity, and God knows i always worked to uplift everyone's knowledge and understanding, unlike some.

[rakarskiy]

I also state that in the groove of the generator, the magnetic lines do not cross the wire to induce the EMF.
I still argue that the two emfs are fatally different from each other.
As an example, he cited a simple experiment rejected by orthodox physics.
And this experience is directly related to the principle of operation of the synchronous generator and the Holcomb generator.
You cannot convince me, these are the results of searches, research, experiments.
As they say, if you want to hide, put it in a prominent place.

[nix85]

That flux cutting and flux linking are two different phenomena is something i have been saying for at least 3 years.
But there is no configuration of spinning generator in which wire does not cut magnetic lines, no matter which configuration is used, in spinning generator wire ALWAYS cuts flux. Only exception is Homopolar generator but it does not even have wire, and that is not what you are referring to. Understanding electric motor Windings!
As for HOOPER-MONSTEIN, i explained and PROVED clearly experiment is flawed, in it induction happens normally in two different ways. To illustrate the point, i drew two lines of flux (yellow) one from each magnet meeting in the wire before they merge. And when they merge they leave the wire but now there is flux passing through the loop which also causes induction, as i explained before. Second one should be when they are bit closer but only one photo is available and it's clear what is conveyed.
When you act like a religious fanatic then facts cannot convince you. Your opinion is result of not understanding law of induction. Science is about being objective and correct. And you are going against clearly proven, undeniable facts.

[fuzzb3k]

My view is that I think it's alright for people to have differing opinions, so why bother spending the time and effort trying to convince each other that the other party is wrong? Arguing the toss (British term) isn't really helping us here, and differences of opinion such as this are regularly distracting from the topic of conversation.

Ultimately it is the Universe that will determine the right path, for reality cannot be fooled.

Can't we all just accept everyone is unique and entitled to their own opinions, and work together towards a common goal?