Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[nix85]

I made a simple animation of Hooper-Monstein experiment to show what should be clear to everyone since i explained it clearly many times already. It is very simple, there is really nothing hard to understand if one just looks at it.

Animation shows a voyage of two lines of flux from the two approaching magnets.

You can see the coil in the middle represented by a dot with x (electron coming into the screen)
and dot (out of the screen).

To take everything into account i have made the wire flux expel the magnet flux, wire maybe does not significantly expel the magnet flux in reality or maybe it does - for fact is if we drop a neodymium magnet on a copper bar, even if we smash it against it magnet will STOP centimeter or two away from the copper bar and then slowly come down. If induced field was not as strong as the kinetic incoming energy, obviously magnet would not stop, equal and opposite.

So for the sake of the argument, let's say wire expels the magnet flux fully. Nothing changes Hooper-Monstein-wise.

Gif shows clearly what happens. Flux lines meet in the wire which induces voltage in normal manner and then they merge and form a line of flux which passes through the coil again inducing voltage in normal manner.

As shown, flux of the wire is spinning clockwise, thus repelling incoming flux on both sides and counteracting the increase of flux through the loop to the left.

https://pasteboard.co/G39LG6W16pJU.gif

[alan]

Hooper-Monstein looks interesting. So it creates no back torque in the center circuit? 
Floyd Sweet mentioned Hooper and Figuera, his setup resembles the experimental setup. 
B field cancel, E fields add, by means of A-mvp or else it makes not much sense in that cancelled B induces no E.

[nix85]

Of course it creates back torque in the center circuit, in most normal manner.
Like i said there is nothing unconventional about Hooper-Monstein.
It is the most ordinary induction by wire cutting and flux linking.

As i said x times already, the very fact coil "sees" or "feels" the change of flux
through it is what indicates clearly induction is mediated by the A field.

As i said all induction formulas are saying the same thing in slightly different way

V=-N*dΦ/dt
V = BLv
E = 4.44 * number of turns * frequency * flux in the core

Greater the rate of change of flux greater the voltage.

And as said image bistander posted is the same image i have been posting (screenshot from the canadian documentary), it shows motor effect (laplace)

As for bucking principle, obviously two canceled B fields should
not and usually do not induce any E field. But....and there is always
a but, there are special situations.

[alan]

Yes it has to, current always makes flux that works against the primary flux, but is the back torque felt by the moving magnets? 
I don't pay attention to all posts so you'll repeat yourself. But now i'm interested.

[nix85]

Yes, obviously, magnets feel the drag as induced field is repelling them both.