Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

https://pasteboard.co/G39LG6W16pJU.gif

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hoopmnst.htm

Even if there is one magnet, the magnetic lines crossing the conductor will have a magnetic induction value B, which is negligible, in order to fulfill the condition for inducing the EMF by the contact method. Isn't the previous calculation enough:

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578763/#msg578763

[nix85]

http://jnaudin.free.fr/images/hopmnanm.gif
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hoopmnst.htm

Even if there is one magnet, the magnetic lines crossing the conductor will have a magnetic induction value B, which is negligible, in order to fulfill the condition for inducing the EMF by the contact method. Isn't the previous calculation enough:

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578763/#msg578763

It's not enough cause you did not take into account it's a coil.

Of course side flux is much weaker than the pole flux for pole flux is maximally concentrated while side flux is spread all around.

Like i said, it's a COIL, not a straight piece of wire. I have been saying that and drawing that for days and now have animated it and you still miss this obvious fact.

All that flux is passing through the coil. End of story.


IF experiment was done differently so that moment when all flux has already merged and wire sees no flux was the starting point. And if moving the magnets closer in such configuration induced large voltage or any voltage for that matter then that would show induction that "should not" happen. But Hooper-Monstein is NOT such configuration and such configuration will not induce any voltage because there is no change of flux in it.

[rakarskiy]

Take my drawing:

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578853/#msg578853


Bm=0.37T
S = 0.01m*0.01m = 0.02m2 
Ф= 0.37*0.02= 0.0074 Weber
f = 1 Hz

E = 4.44 Фf   = 4.44*0.0074*1 = 0,032856V (0.032856 volts = 32.856 millivolts)

And since it was correctly noted that the magnets do not approach each other very close, the resulting value of the magnetic induction in the air gap between the poles will be less, the EMF indicator will be less. And since we have two gaps, the resulting magnetic induction must also be halved.

I took the frequency conditionally equal to 1 Hz, there is a technique for how to approximately calculate the linear speed to the frequency. This is what I did, and that's what confused me earlier. Я был уверен что магнитные линии должны пересечь проводник. В итоге я разобрался.

PS.
All good discoveries. My system of impulse-return action did not turn out to be OverUnity. The battery just drains very slowly, this is a good way to desulfate.
Basically, this is my old circuit, I just changed the switching and winding system according to how the switching should take place.
You need to use the magnetic flux already ready. I decided to focus on the MEG system, in any case, the permanent magnet already has a magnetic strength that needs to be used.
Who wants to engage in the repetition of Holcomb, I gave my recommendations. Just keep in mind that you need to start with a full load of the phase and keep this load. If not, then there comes a moment when the excitation exceeds the generation. At certain moments, the generation may collapse altogether.


https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578767/#msg578767

[nix85]

That is not your main mistake. Your main mistake is totally neglecting the key fact that we are talking about a coil, not a straight, open piece of wire, and that all that flux 0.37T (i don't know where you got that value, i don't see it on JNaudin page or in Monstein's paper) or whatever the value passes through it and induces voltage in normal manner.

[dsquared18]

Lottalead,

Glad to hear you have contacted Ellen - be patient, she's quite a busy person, as you can imagine,
and her top priority is far from entertaining a "forum lynch mob."

From my prospective these forums have not lived up to their potential - technically or otherwise - so
I've pulled far away from them.

"One can only bang ones head so long, until one realizes the only reason one does it is because it feels
so good when one stops!" 

Except for the occassional "Bashing of a Troll or two" - which I do enjoy (as you have seen) - my forum
participation has become near non-existant.

Time is better spent on the development and educational course design aspects of excess energy, IMHO.
Re-hashing basic middle school physics, over and over, is far from productive - for me at least... 

Enough "stuff" has already been provided over the last several years such that these ideas are well within
grasp by everyone who is willing to do a little serious scraping and learning.

Just waiting for Holcomb, and company, to make their next move!

Have a good one; and good luck with your lab visit - you'll likely find it quite interesting and exciting, at worst!

SL

Hi SL,

I for one am sad to hear you're stepping back. I have found your posts to be helpful, informative and thought-provoking - just what this forum needs.

The forum would, in my opinion, be much more effective with a culling of emotional and/or schoolyard bullying commentary and just focusing on a level-handed discussion of the topic at hand. Yes there are always disagreements - this is expected in a field pushing the frontiers of knowledge - but I don't remember the great pioneers of science using insults, sarcasm or mimicry to get their point across. It's like someone said - "don't get into an argument with stupid people, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".

Thanks for your efforts here.

All the best,
D²