Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

Sick imagination, nothing more is exactly yours. You don't understand the basic induction nor the fact that, as i wrote x times before, in the experiment magnets never approach closer than 3 diameters of the magnet, and most voltage is induced when rate of change of flux through the COIL is biggest. At the closest point of approach of two magnets in the so called experiment rate of change of flux is the greatest, of course most voltage is induced at that moment.

It is not bad to be mistaken, it is terrible when one stupidly persists in the flaw after being clearly disproven so it turned into a painful delusion for you but also education for the community.

I say, prove that the magnetic lines intersect the conductor in sufficient density to fulfill the emf condition. In this case, the opposite magnetic flux vectors will not induce an emf. your drawings for the patients of the sixth ward.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2023/03/blog-post.html?m=1

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5nBmOnb1iYdxPiaXiv1IZLuhq4xceOHooYhn2GQOY5-HEv1uz3y7FhByrrilAedb4Somgkdq7oAP6lG3qiIZ4F1UqwilCXhLMqTODELx-vyL9DPfsQhmEK-tJs0AOIbry5-9k5O8aHON2qeCwKXzN16BdOjbm6C2r3SEVCQDY7unI6rPOCxt15snM/s1465/2023-06-12_143305.jpg

[nix85]

I say, prove that the magnetic lines intersect the conductor in sufficient density to fulfill the emf condition. In this case, the opposite magnetic flux vectors will not induce an emf. your drawings for the patients of the sixth ward.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2023/03/blog-post.html?m=1

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5nBmOnb1iYdxPiaXiv1IZLuhq4xceOHooYhn2GQOY5-HEv1uz3y7FhByrrilAedb4Somgkdq7oAP6lG3qiIZ4F1UqwilCXhLMqTODELx-vyL9DPfsQhmEK-tJs0AOIbry5-9k5O8aHON2qeCwKXzN16BdOjbm6C2r3SEVCQDY7unI6rPOCxt15snM/s1465/2023-06-12_143305.jpg

What i say are obvious, undeniable facts. It's up to you to prove otherwise. You can't cause you are wrong.

I even drew it so you can see what you should've seen yourself, that in Hooper-Monstein experiment at closest approach magnets are 3 magnet diameters distant.

At that distance much or even most of the flux has yet not merged + flux density is greatest near the magnet and thus rate of change of flux at closest approach is the greatest and thus biggest EMF.

Top right in image below shows two magnets in similar situation but much closer, about 1.5 magnet diameters away, and there is STILL much flux left to merge, not to mention at double the distance and beyond (magnetic flux density falls with square of distance and sometimes (at the poles) even at cube of distance). And that is the closest approach, induction happens UP TO that point, so even at greater distance.

Meditate on the words "3 magnet diameters away" and beyond. Don't use term "vectors" to sound smarter, it does not help you. And don't use term "opposite" as if the fact that flux lines are opposite is somehow not helping induction, if they were not opposite they would cancel out, they NEED to be opposite in such induction. Rate of change of flux is the greatest at point of closest approach. EMF is induced in perfectly normal way. Your "claims" are for the patients of the sixth ward.

[rakarskiy]

 

[nix85]

LOL, he does not get it his own "diagram" debunks him.
Flux density through the COIL increasing circa 3 times
from circa 5 magnet diameters away to circa 1.3 diameters away.

[rakarskiy]

Go ahead and prove it! The formula helps you (Е=B*l*v) in both cases the magnetic induction density at the point of the wire is 0.09 Tesla.
If you're going to be sly and can't calculate it, better go sit in your rocket and fly to the moon and tell your tales to the lunatics.