Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

The attached Tennessee lawsuit is dated 7/24/2023.  I post it for those who may find it of interest.  Apologies if it has already been mentioned on this thread and I missed it.  The entire document is noteworthy but particularly so is the section 29 statement from the former lead engineer for the invention. 

How does this question relate to the essence of the technical solution and operability of the device? The device designated in the document is in a working copy. In the USA they will not grant a patent for a self-propelled device designated on the site https://holcombenergysystems.com/technology-breakthrough/ (US Law of 1951).

There is Holcomb the design engineer and inventor and there is Holcomb the manager of his inventions, these two qualities may not be equal. Don't drag here what kind of manager he is, better to analyze what kind of engineering solutions he applied. This is a technical forum, this site is not an academy of management and investment.

From the point of view of common sense, the claim should have been brought against the U.S. government and the patent office for refusing to patent the machine. And so the plaintiff is an asshole who wanted to "make money" at the expense of other people's creative engineering inventions.

[SolarLab]

The attached Tennessee lawsuit is dated 7/24/2023.  I post it for those who may find it of interest.  Apologies if it has already been mentioned on this thread and I missed it.  The entire document is noteworthy but particularly so is the section 29 statement from the former lead engineer for the invention. 

Beginners Mind,

Thanks for the timely information re: Lawsuit. Did a comprehensive search, but that was a
while ago.

Backing off my committment for a bit until I can gather more details - may have saved me
some considerable turmoil and costs.

Up to this point all data and analysis indicated this device (the Lingen) has excess energy, even the
lab testing. So it creates a bit of a "needs more work" to discover what's what...

Not sure what to think - my investigation and analysis shows the technology works but the Lawsuit
indicates otherwise - ? Interesting stuff!

Will wait until the suit gets a Docket/Case # before chasing it down further however. Recently e-filed.

At first glance it does appear the device in question was one of the older designs (motor/generator)
but that will require a bit more study to determine all the details. There are a variety of patents.

Hey - they might just have the Input and Output wires crossed...       Been there, done that!

Thanks again and have a good one!

SL

[bistander]

The attached Tennessee lawsuit is dated 7/24/2023.  I post it for those who may find it of interest.  Apologies if it has already been mentioned on this thread and I missed it.  The entire document is noteworthy but particularly so is the section 29 statement from the former lead engineer for the invention. 

Thanks.

It doesn't work. Imagine that.
bi

[SolarLab]

Thanks.

It doesn't work. Imagine that.
bi

Sounds like they have the "Input" and the "Output" wires crossed... imagine that!    

Strange, since the ones here in Florida appear to be working according to FPL and everyone else.

Wonder if the installation was at a "Used Car Dealership" - just kidding      

    ^{FWIW - Article II.3 should be interesting, just saying!}

These types of disputes are common - which is good since the "Expert Witness" makes out great!

[rakarskiy]

If Holcomb's devices didn't work, Astra would never have entered into a partnership agreement with them. Take a look at Astra's financial turnover.  Do you think they will make nerves because of some Holcomb inventor with a controversial invention. No lawsuit accusing Holcomb's devices of not working will reach the goal because of the demonstration of the device's working capacity to the judicial commission. The very system of government control will not allow such a lawsuit. This is a very strong blow to the system. In the U.S., judicial precedent is actually a legislative act.

Holcomb would benefit from such a lawsuit, followed by a libel charge and financial damages.


Once again I remind you that this is a technical forum and you need technical solutions and technical competent engineering analysis. Send high school physics teachers away, they declare what others have written.

_________________________________
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html