Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[ramset]

Honestly
I have heard from reputable sources
Holcomb has 50 ? Or more patents
And several very appropriate to his claims here (4 or 5?)
—-///——
Helping people in poverty is what will change the world ( seems they "appear" ? To help Africa?
Time will tell if it's sincerely helping average person
Or infrastructure to bigger markets ?
We see plenty trying to power ( solar) Europe from Africa and similar arid regions?


Nothing would help faster than onsite autonomous power modules which work 24/7 day or night..
No need for infrastructure .


Would reverse migration models ,stop decimation of so many resources..
And bring many new resources to inhabitants .
Not just one man's opinion..( read mission statement here)


Will be nice to open source free energy systems ..

[lancaIV]

Robert Ray Holcomb applications listed :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=Robert+ray+holcomb&CPC=&IC=
As to see ,12., the only( electrotherapy devices excluding) granted - for U.S.A.valid,not international,patent

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150528&CC=US&NR=2015145364A1&KC=A1#
But :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadoc?CC=US&NR=10008916B2&KC=B2&FT=D&ND=4&date=20180626&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
Expired !

wmbr
OCWL

[onepower]

Not sure if any of you have seen this rejection letter from the USPTO re Holcombs patent application for his self running generator.
Apart from the usual rejection of any device claiming overunity, the USPTO unusually asked for a demonstration and a peer review by an accredited organisation.
That could be a power utility company or a university, either way that would mean independent measurements.

I like this part in the rejection letter, "the claimed invention violates the first law of thermodynamics, which is also known as the principal of conservation of energy, stating the internal energy of an isolated system remains constant"

Man, I would love to debate these dim wits on a live internet video feed, lol.
Uhm, I have a few questions...

1)You falsely claimed, "the claimed invention violates the first law of thermodynamics" but also infer nothing can violate it. So which is it?, did the invention violate something you claim cannot be violated or did it not?.

2)You falsely claimed, the first law of thermodynamics is also known as the principal of the conservation of energy, which is a fallacy. Thermo(heat)-dynamics(motion) is only one form of energy not the same as others like Electro(electric field)-dynamics(motion). In fact, the Conservation of Energy applies to any and/or all forms energy could theoretically take not only something as primitive as heat. You do not seem to understand basic physics or the nature of your claim.

3)You falsely claimed, "the claimed invention violates the first law of thermodynamics, stating the internal energy of an isolated system remains constant". First you would have to prove a truly isolated system can actually exist which you cannot. Second, the patent never claimed the invention was an "imaginary" isolated system which cannot exist. Third, in all open systems which the invention obviously is the total energy is never constant.

I get tired of people too dense to understand basic logic and reasoning.

Logically, they cannot claim "something" violates a law which they also claim cannot be violated because it's a direct contradiction. They could claim the invention violates the first law of thermodynamics but then they would have to explain exactly how, show a direct connection between heat(jiggling atoms) and any other forms of energy present and how all this relates to the invention/process specifically. There not even remotely intelligent enough to do this so of course they generalize using fallacies.

AC

[listener192]

A demonstration of the device to the USPTO, under the supervision of say MIT or similar accredited organisation, would take care of this.


USPTO are inviting this in the letter?


L192

[SolarLab]

Honestly
I have heard from reputable sources
Holcomb has 50 ? Or more patents
And several very appropriate to his claims here (4 or 5?)
—-///——
Helping people in poverty is what will change the world ( seems they "appear" ? To help Africa?
Time will tell if it's sincerely helping average person
Or infrastructure to bigger markets ?
We see plenty trying to power ( solar) Europe from Africa and similar arid regions?


Nothing would help faster than onsite autonomous power modules which work 24/7 day or night..
No need for infrastructure .


Would reverse migration models ,stop decimation of so many resources..
And bring many new resources to inhabitants .
Not just one man's opinion..( read mission statement here)


Will be nice to open source free energy systems ..

Ramset,

Please help me out here - so I can better understand how this is all supposed to work.

Define, in as much detail as possible, what "an open source free energy system,"
as you view it, would consist of.

Your definition of an open source free energy system is:

1. -
2. -
3. -

and so forth. It might help a great deal if there where some defined targets and goals.

Including - "from the initial concept", through, "the build", "the manufacture", "the final distribution,"
and "implementation." Show costs, if possible, thru each stage, and repairs, if needed. Application
examples, locale and in general (how and where).  Minimum requirements, etc.. be specific.

Your interpretation of the whole process of an "open source free energy system." What is it exactly?

Thanks, regards

SL