Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[kolbacict]

I would think the reason why this particular generator has not been included in mainstream history, is more to do with the gentlemans proclivity to anonymity rather than deliberate exclusion, after all Faraday was happy to get P.M. published.

I am afraid to assume that the initials on that letter were not P.M., but S.R.   

[listener192]

You may register for a free account and read the Professor P. J. Mac Laughlin article below.


It is clear that the Professor was relying on the records of Dr  Otto Mahr in Berlin but without securing original copies.


It is not even clear in the text of the identity of P.M. 


It fails to provide credible references to prove that P.M.s invention was published before Pixii's.



https://www.jstor.org/stable/30099770?read-now=1&oauth_data=eyJlbWFpbCI6Imxpc3RlbmVyMTkyQGdtYWlsLmNvbSIsImluc3RpdHV0aW9uSWRzIjpbXSwicHJvdmlkZXIiOiJnb29nbGUifQ&seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents
L192

[rakarskiy]

You may register for a free account and read the Professor P. J. Mac Laughlin article below.


It is clear that the Professor was relying on the records of Dr  Otto Mahr in Berlin but without securing original copies.


It is not even clear in the text of the identity of P.M. 


It fails to provide credible references to prove that P.M.s invention was published before Pixii's.



https://www.jstor.org/stable/30099770?read-now=1&oauth_data=eyJlbWFpbCI6Imxpc3RlbmVyMTkyQGdtYWlsLmNvbSIsImluc3RpdHV0aW9uSWRzIjpbXSwicHJvdmlkZXIiOiJnb29nbGUifQ&seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents
L192

I'm not even going to search, I have an approximate chronology.
1. Faraday's publication of his version of the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction.
2. Faraday's publication of a letter from an unknown person (P.M.) with the proposal of a generator on the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction discovered by Faraday.
3. Publication by the journal of a letter from (Р.М.) with a detailed description of the generator (the page you linked to).

Pixie did his version probably by studying the first letter (P.M.).

The level with which the actual technical task (P.M.) for the generator on the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction is performed is amazing. I would also very much like to know who this person is.

[lancaIV]

rakarskiy,it depends if we mean by electric device an electromagnetic or an electrostatic generator !

1750 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hauksbee_Generator.JPG

In the ' slide': was the term ' dynamo' not fixed by Siemens for the electro-magnets feedback cycle ?
dynamo-electrical principle

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81nyos_Jedlik   
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jedlik_motor.jpg

1827 ' world first electric motor'


wmbr and fine Sunday

OCWL

[listener192]

I'm not even going to search, I have an approximate chronology.
1. Faraday's publication of his version of the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction.
2. Faraday's publication of a letter from an unknown person (P.M.) with the proposal of a generator on the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction discovered by Faraday.
3. Publication by the journal of a letter from (Р.М.) with a detailed description of the generator (the page you linked to).

Pixie did his version probably by studying the first letter (P.M.).

The level with which the actual technical task (P.M.) for the generator on the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction is performed is amazing. I would also very much like to know who this person is.

That is pure speculation.


Do you have specific evidence to support this?


L192