Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Feb2006]

Why I think HES works as claimed.
This is the simpler one with only two poles north and south.
It's a solid state DC generator and it's ingenious.

From WO2018134233.
"The progression of the North pole flux and South pole flux across armature 59 is further demonstrated in FIG. 18. Pole 58(1) emits North pole flux 58a as discussed above which repels North pole flux 58b which emanates from pole 58(2) which has been excited by a pulse on the lead of leads 61L for the coil of coils 61 for pole 58(2). Flux 58b evolves from pole 58(2), 1.043 milliseconds (times are exemplary) after pole 58(1) is excited. The repulsion of flux 58b by flux 58a sets up a pulsing field which progresses across all of the armature's North poles. Pole 57(1) emits South pole flux 57a as discussed above which repels South pole flux 57b which emanates from excited pole 57(2) and which evolves from pole 57(2) 1.043 milliseconds after pole 57(1) is excited. The repulsion of flux 57b by flux 57a sets up a pulsing field which progresses across all of armature 59's South poles. "

He pushes the electrons in the flat solid state stator in one direction and gets DC out,
Read  WO20181344233, especially page 16 - 20 .
The AC one is a bit more complicated, 2 north 2 south and rotated but the poles are still  excited in the same sequenced way as the simpler DC one.

[Feb2006]

A little bit more from WO 2018/134233 A2.


"The poles are sequenced in the following exemplary fashion.
North pole 58(1) and South pole 57(1) are simultaneously excited
with DC current; 1.043 milliseconds later pole North pole 58(2) and
South pole 57(2) are excited; 1.043 milliseconds later North pole 58(3)
and South pole 57(3) South are excited; and then 1.043 milliseconds
later, North pole 58(4) and South pole 57(4) are excited.
Then 1.043 milliseconds later, the cycle begins all over again.
Each pole is excited for four milliseconds and then allowed to
collapse for the next period prior to being excited again.
Again, all times are exemplary."

[Feb2006]

A idea for "HES solid state DC generator core" with small ferrite U cores?

[ramset]

Here Cyril Smith (member Smudge ) makes very interesting observation/analysis,
As well others making  interesting contributions !

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98563;topicseen#msg98563

Smudge quote


The geometry of his non-rotor is nothing like that of conventional rotors, and certainly nothing like transformer cores.  Those long radial tapering spokes could introduce some unusual effects.  The field along the spokes will not be uniform because of the taper and note that he only uses conductive material.  Spin polarised conduction electrons will be drawn along the field gradient attracted to the point of maximum field, which is the inner end of the energised spoke.  Thus in his pulsed sequences there is this electron pumping going on that will affect the fields that couple to the stator coils.  I can imagine the surges in this pumping effect being synchronized so as to provide anomalous energy transfer, with that energy coming from the spins of those conduction electrons.  If the conduction electrons arrive at the rotor pole face while the field at the stator pole due to the load current (the Lenz field) is changing, the changing A field that produces the well known BEMF electric field could be of a polarity that tries to slow down the spins of those electrons.  That is a recipe for OU.  Note that the driving force on the conduction electrons is the field gradient along the spokes, and not the usual electric force coming from a changing magnetic field so there is opportunity to arrange the phasing to achieve the desired effect.  Maybe he found this by accident and doesn't know it.


Edit added info.  Note that a deficit of conduction electrons at the rotor pole face is just as effective as a surge, but in this case it is the spins in the lattice ions there that supply the anomalous energy.


Smudge
End quote

Respectfully submitted
Chet K
Edit for bistander's comment below
Yes ,similar observations by others in link I posted above!

That being said
I love Smudges analysis towards a plausible path forward!

Perhaps a builders topic might be forthcoming (Smudge and Partzman host a moderated builders section here)

[bistander]

Hello Chet K,
I like Smudge's previous post.

quote;


Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1557
I have looked carefully at that latest patent application (it is not a patent) WO 2018/134233.  Like other Holcombe applications it is weird in that it is trying to teach the patent examiner some basic EM history with references to Faraday, Watt, Gramme, Lenz and Tesla.  Perhaps he thinks that will help in getting the patent granted.  He is wrong with regard to Tesla's modification to the Faraday disc, it did not cancel the reverse torque.  In fact he is wrong about many of his claims which come from someone who has only a naive understanding of magnetic phenomena.  He states that his rotor as static hence reverse torque is not an issue, but then later on goes into detail on how his wonderful system cancels reverse torque.  He mentions graphene several times and thinks it has high permeability.  In fact it is highly diamagnetic and has permeability near zero.  His view on fields emanating from pole faces is naive to the extreme.  He talks about field lines running parallel to the surface of the rotor (this is not a moving/ rotating field although his rotor coil sequencing attempts to do that to field lines emanating normal to those surfaces) and that is just nonsense.  He talks about unipole rotors and such things can''t exist (field lines can't just appear from nowhere, there has to be a reverse pole somewhere like along the drive shaft of the rotor that doesn't exist in his machine).  He does show rotors with N and S poles but then doesn't use them in his battery replacement system which needs unipole rotors.  So all in all a pretty useless patent application in my view.

Smudge

unquote:

From the same thread which Chet linked. Note the sentence which I bolded. Sumdge sums up my observations nicely with that statement.
bi