Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

If the patent granted was against application US 2019 / 0238011 A1,
that application did not make a claim that it could power its self.
It also makes no specific claim for efficiency.
On this basis I could see why the USPTO would grant a patent.


L192

Thanks.
In a nutshell, what is it good for? Usefulness?
bi

[phoneboy]

I understood. This is what is in many switching power supplies to protect against excess surge current. As part of the PWM controller.  And also in my frequency converters for asynchronous
motors, for which you do not give me a diagram. 
And what does rolamite have to do with it?

Just like a contact switch?
I thought at first that there was a big intrigue hidden there ...

A rolamite has nothing to do with the holcomb device it was just an idea for a low friction sparkless mechanical switch with regards to the figueroa device.
The reason I posted was because I see some possible correlatipns between the two methods, the moving field and "A unique method of harnessing energy from the magnetic domains found in ferromagnetic and paramagnetic materials"
In the drawing you have two closed magnetic circuits.  If you were to map out the fields in the inductor array based on input to the individual switch positions you see how the fields break into two loops between positions 2-8.  All that was covered long ago.  The reason for the ferrite rods is due to that. The ferrite gets magnetized for free aligning its domains and then this stray field that magnetizes it moves on as the switch position changes. Now, what happens to this piece or ferrite as its field collapses in this closed magnetic circuit?  Essentially, I think if the these devices are overunity its due to heat.

[rakarskiy]

https://patents.google.com/patent/US11336134B2/en?oq=US+%2211336134%22+B2


B1: [/font][/size]Invention patent (second publication after examination)[/font][/size] [/font][/size]
B2: Supplementary invention patent (second publication after examination)[/font][/size]

Thank you!  "re-publication after EXPERTISE!" it remains to be understood what list of measures is included in the examination when a patent application is granted or denied.

Nice illustration of the same Holcomb patent "Solid State Rotor" under different editions.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190238011A1/en?oq=US+"11336134"+B2
I dare to suggest that there is such an item in the EXPERTISE - "research of the current model".

[kolbacict]

  Essentially, I think if the these devices are overunity its due to heat.

I thought about it. If we catch the cooling phase of the ferromagnetic material and use external thermal energy. But, unfortunately, the speed of electrical processes is too fast, and thermal inertia
is too slow. This is a technological contradiction.

p.s. Rolamite itself is a unique device.
So I fantasize about creating an electrical analogue of it.

[rakarskiy]

Another story of the solid state generator, the principle of the same switching is different. Changing places of terms in a traditional commutator machine.

Patent *US8629588B2 , Inventor Park Zhe Sun,
"A device for generating AC power by a DC power brush rotating with a field pole generator, and a device for generating DC power"

(cunning name can be just SOLID STATE GENERATOR)

peculiarities
2010-07-08 Application filed by Jae Song Park
2012-05-10 Publication US20120113697A1  (Three years after application)
2014-01-14 The application is satisfied* (the letter B at the end of the patent indicates that an examination has been carried out)
2014-01-14 Publication US8629588B2 (Four years after publication, and seven years after application)
Status Active until 2030-12-17