Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,


I am quoting here Lunkster's post, which "was" (now deleted) on my Building Thread...responding to my previous one here...


Ufopolitics

Hi

I like what you just said about what things could look like in the future with free energy!
They are similar to what most FE researchers are striving for.

I also see the new designs looking a lot different from the current ones.
In order to get more people interested in this new technology, replications
need to be generated and verified by third parties.

Also the amplification of electrical energy using industrial steel
needs to be demonstrated in its very basic simplest form.

What I mean in its simplest form is like when the function of
one of the following devices are explained;  FET,  Transistor, or photo cell.

After this happens, then many people will jump on board and will be
working on the bench with ways to improve and implement
this technology.

I am glad to see all the work that is currently being poured
into investigating this technology and we need a lot more people doing it.

After you get the full operating FE systems running we
will all be excited to see it in operation.

So thank you again for all the hours that is being worked on it to
bring this technology to the world!

Lunkster

P.S.
It would be nice if someone would start a thread with replicated FE
devices that have already completed third party verification on them.

[Ufopolitics]

Happened across an excellent tutorial on RMF, Rotating Magnetic Field.

https://youtu.be/YYQayMrK4Fo

bi

Thanks Bistander,

Indeed it is a great Tutorial!!...excellent animated graphics!!

So, I am guessing that now you do could establish the difference between what I have explained prior, versus these Three Field Phases set at different Angles?

Thks again, I really enjoyed the video!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

Some more information!

A very good video about the magnetic holder (from a guy from the city of Kharkov, Ukraine), or rather about what kind of field appears in an iron core when a wire is pulled through it with current.
A good and clear example of where the own field in the stator comes from when the phase is under load.

Sincerely, Rakarskiy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J912WdC7Od4&t=1692s
(video language russian)

[bistander]

Thanks Bistander,

Indeed it is a great Tutorial!!...excellent animated graphics!!

So, I am guessing that now you do could establish the difference between what I have explained prior, versus these Three Field Phases set at different Angles?

Thks again, I really enjoyed the video!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

No, I don't know what you're talking about. Look again at this:
http://www.ece.umn.edu/users/riaz/animations/spacevecmovie.html
We're talking about the magnetic flux density field B vector represented by the black arrow traveling around in circular motion (rotating) with constant magnitude. As you call them "Three Field Phases", I guess, or the phase currents or H vectors are represented by the blue, green and red arrows that change in magnitude but are at constant angles, meaning they pulsate and don't rotate. So it is this black vector, not the other three, that is the sum or resultant that compares to the rotating magnetic flux field of the wound rotating member which you strive to replace.

You could not distinguish any difference between the resultant field produced from balanced 3-phase stator winding as demonstrated in the video and a RMF from a wound rotor or PM rotating. The flux or magnetic field or main field has no signature or feature from the number or angle of phases. This can be clearly seen in the mathematical proof to which I linked.
bi

[Ufopolitics]

No, I don't know what you're talking about. Look again at this:
http://www.ece.umn.edu/users/riaz/animations/spacevecmovie.html
We're talking about the magnetic flux density field B vector represented by the black arrow traveling around in circular motion (rotating) with constant magnitude. As you call them "Three Field Phases", I guess, or the phase currents or H vectors are represented by the blue, green and red arrows that change in magnitude but are at constant angles, meaning they pulsate and don't rotate. So it is this black vector, not the other three, that is the sum or resultant that compares to the rotating magnetic flux field of the wound rotating member which you strive to replace.

OMG Bistander...for God's sake man!!

You keep repeating the resultant vector (B Field)...or the "magnetic flux density field"...
Flux=Flow...there is nothing "technical" about the word "flux"...it means "flow" or the emanation that a magnetic field, or several fields produces, generates...and it varies, depends upon many factors...we could vary that flow/flux according to field input...attenuate it or increase it...collapse it or maintain it constant.

Point is, flux is NOT a Field...it is the resultant "product" generated by the field.

In the case of the 3 phase, there are 3 Fields which generate 3 different flow/flux...but due to the space time situation, it's 3 flux coincides into a single flow. However, independently, each field dies/collapses, at certain timing, no matter if the next incoming field will "take over" the flux supply...and that is the difference!!

I was also collapsing the fields before, and there were not just three fields, but many, many more...and, as a matter of fact, due to the brush-element contacts, there were always a way to keep previous field "a bit alive" before full development of next one...however, it did not do the effect we are seeing here...and that you will also see very soon...

These Systems do not like "bumps" in their "resolution" over time, meaning, fields coming down, while another one rising...
In that graphic it looks so fine...referring to that resultant B Field, which looks very steady, and smoothly moving...but in reality it ain't doing so!!...there are "bumps" every time each field start going down, to then rise when the next is coming up...
And You know that perfectly well!!

It is similar to the "direct currents" obtained by a 4 bridge rectifier from AC...is it really a straight, smooth line without any interruptions?
NO IT IS NOT!!...it is a "bumpy" up-down curves...diodes just "cut" the down side of sinewaves, leaving the upper positive curves...not a straight line.

You could not distinguish any difference between the resultant field produced from balanced 3-phase stator winding as demonstrated in the video and a RMF from a wound rotor or PM rotating. The flux or magnetic field or main field has no signature or feature from the number or angle of phases. This can be clearly seen in the mathematical proof to which I linked.
bi

Of course I can see it very clearly, and it is the complete opposite of what we are looking for...this is just a three field setup, trying to unify into one, the spread angle is 120° between the three, which makes it a VERY LOW BELOW, DOWN, RESOLUTION FIELD.

And even in a Four Pole setup, it is still 90° angle diff, which is still huge.

In the arrangement I have, which is 8 pairs of coils, totaling 16 coils IS STILL a VERY LOW RESOLUTION FIELD, and we are talking 22.5°...even though it is being fed by real DC, not bumpy curves...However, the difference is that I am not collapsing the MAIN FIELD at any time.

It is either "you can not see" or "you do not want to see"...

Cheers

Ufopolitics