Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Feb2006]

Solarlab your timing sequence does not add up ,
"North pole 58(1) and South pole 57(1) are simultaneously excited with DC current;
1.043 milliseconds later North pole 58(2) and South pole 57(2) are excited;
1.043 milliseconds later North pole 58(3)and South pole 57(3)  are excited; and then
1.043 milliseconds later, North pole 58(4)and South pole 57(4) are excited.

Then 1.043 milliseconds later, the cycle begins all over again.

  1,043 + 1,043 + 1.043 + 1.043 = 4.172

Don't understand where you get 4ms off from?
I think period is for each pole and cycle is for all poles.

[bistander]

...
You keep repeating the resultant vector (B Field)...or the "magnetic flux density field"...
Flux=Flow...there is nothing "technical" about the word "flux"...it means "flow" or the emanation that a magnetic field, or several fields produces, generates...and it varies, depends upon many factors...we could vary that flow/flux according to field input...attenuate it or increase it...collapse it or maintain it constant.

Point is, flux is NOT a Field...it is the resultant "product" generated by the field.
...

Hi Ufo,
As one of my reasons to be here is to challenge falsehoods, I will pick on this one. I know we discussed this before; how magnetic flux doesn't flow, but you insist it does and so state. Anyone can study magnetic fundamentals and learn the truth. I'll post an example below.

A quote from:

https://tinyurl.com/2n2j9fm9

"However, magnetic flux does not actually flow from the north to the south pole or flow anywhere for that matter as magnetic flux is a static region around a magnet in which the magnetic force exists. In other words magnetic flux does not flow or move it is just there and is not influenced by gravity. "

And this region is considered a field. A magnetic flux field.
bi

[rakarskiy]

Pictures referenced in previous comment did not attach.  Here they all are.

There is nothing unusual about the design of the Holcomb generator. It has two solid-state rotors, external and internal, and between them a stator with generator windings. It actually has two generators in one.
Study my posts, you can simply collect them separately and find all the answers.
Holcomb models the operation of a four-pole rotor, the rotor can be either internal or external.
Why switching, it creates in the stator the effect of constant magnetic intensity along the poles that move

There is another patent by inventor Park Jae-sung that "skeptics of the system" are ignoring

https://patents.google.com/patent/US8629588B2/en?oq=8%2c629%2c588

this is the same thing, only the switching of electromagnets is different, on the contrary with a collector motor.

[Beginners Mind]

Rikarskiy - Thank you for your comment.  I have studied your posts, as well as all others on this thread and on UFOPolitics' excellent build thread.  If the answers were there I would not have wasted anyone's time with my post.  I fully understand the principles of this device and have studied the patent in detail.  Please do not equate my being a Newbie on this forum with a lack of understanding or my ability as a builder. 

The pictures of the windings on the "rotor" being used in Holcomb's present device do not at all correspond with the windings in the patents or the windings you just posted pictures of. 

Please pay particular attention to the picture of the bottom of the rotor again attached.  The windings span multiple teeth with the wires to the outside spaced every 3 teeth on what looks like a 36 tooth rotor.  It appears he has inserted spacers in the center of each tooth to fix an air gap distance.  We should discern what kind of wiring and switching pattern corresponds to that picture if we wish to fully understand how Holcomb is presently creating his rotating magnetic field. 

   

[rakarskiy]

Rikarskiy - Thank you for your comment.  I have studied your posts, as well as all others on this thread and on UFOPolitics' excellent build thread.  If the answers were there I would not have wasted anyone's time with my post.  I fully understand the principles of this device and have studied the patent in detail.  Please do not equate my being a Newbie on this forum with a lack of understanding or my ability as a builder. 

The pictures of the windings on the "rotor" being used in Holcomb's present device do not at all correspond with the windings in the patents or the windings you just posted pictures of. 

Please pay particular attention to the picture of the bottom of the rotor again attached.  The windings span multiple teeth with the wires to the outside spaced every 3 teeth on what looks like a 36 tooth rotor.  It appears he has inserted spacers in the center of each tooth to fix an air gap distance.  We should discern what kind of wiring and switching pattern corresponds to that picture if we wish to fully understand how Holcomb is presently creating his rotating magnetic field. 

First, if you look at the windings, I see the generator winding laid.
Secondly, if we assume that this is really a rotor, then there is an interesting patent by Nikola Tesla, where the excitation of the pole went in a wave-like manner. As an option, this option is probably correct, to reduce the inductance parameter.
I don't care how he decided to excite the magnetic pole. The main thing is that he excites them according to a special algorithm.
The gap is important, but it should be as small as possible.

In the attached photo, everything is beautifully visible, something that is in the patent is in reality.

Sincerely!