Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[pix]

Resulting force on the shaft work 20000 [N] 

quite a bit more, probably the engineers should not have bothered installing the flywheel.

It does not matter. Calculation based on your data.
Simple machine. Leverage of torque. COP<1.


Cheers,
Pix

[rakarskiy]

It does not matter. Calculation based on your data.
Simple machine. Leverage of torque. COP<1.


Cheers,
Pix

Agree, this example fails. We take real abs, not my fantasies!

Specifications KD2128E
Single-crank press, single-acting, open, non-tilting KD2128E Designed for the manufacture of parts from sheet material using cold stamping operations: punching, hole punching, bending, shallow drawing, etc. It is used in procurement workshops of enterprises in the automotive, tractor, instrument-making, radio-electronic and other industries with large-scale and mass production.

Model kd2128e
Start of series production 1984
Rated force, kN 630
Slider stroke, mm 100
Distance between table and slider, mm 340
Distance between table and slider, mm 340
Power of the engine of the main movement of kW 6,3
Table size width/length mm 480/710
Machine dimensions Length Width Height (mm) 1500_1690_2890
Weight kg 5400

Good luck deciding that here is efficiency <1

[SolarLab]

Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an "element of concentration", used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&action=dlattach;topic=4154.0;attach=40758;image

That is, according to the abbreviation from the Kapanadze scheme - "current amplifier". I described the principle and physics above.

My simple version of the device according to this principle in the figure  https://strannik-2.ru/media/kunena/attachments/587/525258.jpg


This is the base, everything else is engineering creativity.

Sincerely.

PS
Formula:  E=mc^2,  can be read as follows, that a particle with a mass (m), upon reaching the speed of light squared (c^2), becomes light.

Hello Rakarskiy,    (this will be very brief since it's somewhat off topic)

The Ruslan Generator (Kapanadze device) has been the subject of analysis for a long time - documented in one form or another as far back as 12/08/16.
For a bit more information on the project see the attached pdf.

My approach in attempting to explain the "excess energy" focused on a "Travelling Wave Tube" analogy since I have some experience that area. Whether correct or not, I concluded the extra energy was formed by a pseudo "Velocity Modulation" phenomena based on E=mv² (electron energy increases by the square of it's velocity - as shown in the video referenced above) and electron bunching.


High voltage pulses were generated by a Tesla or Katcher coil and when propagated around the Grenade coil and, with proper timing and physical spacing, caused an excess energy within the system.  A protoype seemed to demonstrate this postulation since HV and physical adjustments followed closely with some very preliminary CAE analysis.

However the system was highly resonant (easily disturbed by even hand waving) and it appeared to be very subject to Atmospheric Electric activity (a thunderstorm even 200 miles away caused the system to become unstable).  A work-around or fix is yet to be determined.

The exact "coupling mechanism" physics is still uncertain, to me at least.

Regards,
SL

[rakarskiy]

The exact "coupling mechanism" physics is still uncertain, to me at least.

Hello SolarLab!

This is the most important question, how one kind of "energy" accelerates another kind of "energy". An electromagnetic circuit consists of two types of fields: an electric field and a magnetic field. There are no electrons there, these are two states of plasma, a structured ether in a state of a force field. The plasma of the magnetic field and the electric field has a manifestation in different, visible to us and invisible, spectra

Unfortunately, many do not even understand the difference between electromagnetic induction and interturn mutual induction. Ideas about the difference between the flux linkage of electric and magnetic fields. Even Faraday began his research with mutual induction, so the generator came up with an incognito with the initials P.M., who clearly understood or knew the difference.

How does the generator circuit work with a load, how does the circuit work when a transformer is inserted between the generator and the load?

I can say with a 100% guarantee that the electromagnetic induction of the generator winding, closed in a circuit with a load, works by analogy with a hydroelectric power plant system. When the blade absorbs the velocity of the water head (that is, the speed of the turbine blade must be half the velocity of the water jet from the nozzle that presses on the blade in order to obtain the corresponding force on the turbine shaft)

For the operation of a closed circuit of an electrical circuit: generator-load, the same alignment. Only the electrical parameter of the EMF is absorbed. The transformer has a different adjustment, it is calculated by the formula for bringing the load of the secondary circuit to the AC source of the primary circuit. The source of the primary circuit operates according to the generator circuit rule. Again, the circle is closed, I especially like the "chatter of general science" about the magnetic field in the core, at the moment of maximum current of the primary and secondary circuits.

The trouble for many is that they simply ignore the concepts of how the circuit works with the load and the source - the generator phase. Where CURRENT POWER (a vortex magnetic field that rotates rather than flows) is the result of balancing the potentials of the electric field, at the moment of balancing becomes a vortex around the conductor. This plasma of magnetic and electric vortex fields can be seen in a spark gap or electric arc. Perhaps this is the key point that changed my worldview about electromagnetism.
These questions are on the subject of the Holcomb generator, because if you ignore it, you are guaranteed to stumble upon a wall of paradoxes and misunderstandings.

According to the instrument of Ruslan Kalabukhov. The device is an option when the electric potential of the secondary circuit of the Tesla transformer tries to illuminate the electric field in a complex inter-turn converter (Garnet), while transferring "energy" from the primary circuit to the secondary circuit with a reinforcing element. That is, according to the formula I = λ (E + E from the side), they try to add the sides E[/glow ] + E of the source[ /b].

My opinion is that this method is too slippery, since it is not clear which moment is effective, is it utopia to combine mutual induction and induction in one section of the wire? . The main thing that I don't like is the transposed electric field of the secondary circuit of the Tesla transformer, I don't understand how the concentration process will take place? The concentration process is effective in a direct or pulsed current circuit. Second: LOAD of the secondary circuit, only fixed, destroys the process when the load changes. Thirdly: the Tesla transformer emitter in this version has an open field, that is, external communication can also affect. I do not consider this version successful.

My idea is to make an impulse system based on this principle. The only task left is to make the static electric field around the conductor move according to the vortex model. I think that there is one more thing that I need to think about thoroughly - the Zatsarinin transformer and the inductive-capacitive transformer. I worked with it and came to an approximate understanding of the picture. I will deal with this later.

At the moment,  is busy with a pulse electromagnetic static converter, it is simpler. Can be repeated by any craftsman in the garage with a minimum of training.

Sincerely.

[pix]

Agree, this example fails. We take real abs, not my fantasies!

Good luck deciding that here is efficiency <1

Are you kidding, right?
Please stop trying to convince me that simple machanical machine that utilizes torque leverage has COP>1.
EOT.


Cheers,
Pix