Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

Someone will answer me, in the end, why does the secondary winding need to be placed on another part, another yoke ? Separated from the primary yoke by air gap, moreover, which worsens the parameters ?  Why is it impossible to wind the secondary winding in the same place, and close the poles with a magnetic circuit ?  Is there a fundamental need for this ?

This option is preferable, but this is no longer Holcomb Energy System. 
For a static design, this will be Figuera, for a dynamic one: my RAGEN rotoverter, Holcomb also has such a design. All who think come to the original design.

[ariovaldo]

Another observation:- in " Charlie Brown", it appears that every other slot was driller or machined to make it larger.
I'm emphasizing that because the best approach is to understand the effects, replicate that and prove that is real or at least that we can understand how it works.




Ariovaldo

[Ufopolitics]

Someone will answer me, in the end, why does the secondary winding need to be placed on another part, another yoke ? Separated from the primary yoke by air gap, moreover, which worsens the parameters ?  Why is it impossible to wind the secondary winding in the same place, and close the poles with a magnetic circuit ?  Is there a fundamental need for this ?

Hello kolbacict,

Yes, there is a fundamental need for this "scenario"
EM Induction have laws, some we have found over experiments, over and over as many others are written...and they are all based on SPATIAL GEOMETRIES.

For example, if you wind rotor and stator on the same core-yoke, where the Field rotation result in a SIDEWAYS movement, related to the INDUCED COILS, it will NOT work, as simple as that.
There ALWAYS need to be a FRONTAL APPROACH (Straight Vector directional approach) between Inducer-Induced Coils at some point in Spacetime, and never "sideways" and within the same rotational line, it will not work.
And am not saying you will not get "some" induction in a "sideways-in line, or aligned" movement...but it would be very easy to verify with same coils, same Input to Inducer Coils where is a better, stronger Induction, whenever you change Spatial positioning of coils eg: Coils next to each others versus front to front approach.

Hope you understand this fact, without having to explain based on graphics.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[kolbacict]

Yes, I understood. Thanks everyone. And if you weld the "stator" to the "rotor" by electric welding, will it change anything?
Just trying to understand...

[Ufopolitics]

And if you weld the "stator" to the "rotor" by electric welding, will it change anything?
Just trying to understand...

Nope, it will not change anything by welding stator to rotor, except, you will no longer have access to coils maintenance or replacement...
I am in the process of discovering there is a way to increase these systems performance by dual modulation* of the rotating field...plus a "cross firing**" of the rotating field...

* Double signals to Field, one works as a Distributor of signals (my rotary switch), the other as a PWM (any typical Motor Controller for brushes), we should be able to sync them easily...and eventually would be able to make them both into one...
** Crossfiring based on same sync system, plus a double set of rotating fields-coils, one Internally set as another one externally to the Induced Coils.

Whenever I am ready, I will share it...in visual experiments

Cheers