Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Goat]

Hi all

I listened to the video again and heard something that I didn't hear the 1st time so here goes...

At around 1:20 and after that part of the interview it gets interesting in that he talks about magnetic pooling after relaxation of the magnetic domains acting on the electrical steel and it's atoms...I'm curious to hear from this forum's experts to explain how this could yield an exponential energy amplification...not an expert...just curious to see if his explanation holds any truth about electrical steel atoms and magnetic domains being manipulated to get a gain from magnetic spin around the steel atoms producing a positive feedback or whatever to get a gain.

Again, I'm not an expert which is why I'm asking anyone who can explain the possibility of OU based on what he is describing.

Regards   

[listener192]

WIPO PCT INTERNATIONAL SEARCH AND PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION GUIDELINES[/font][/size]

Industrial Applicability[/font][/size]A14.01[2].1 Some International Authorities consider claimed subject matter to have industrial applicability only when all of the following requirements have been met; otherwise industrial applicability is lacking:[/size](1) The international application must indicate the way in which the invention is capable of exploitation in industry (its intended function, special purpose or specific use).[/size](2) The international application must disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete (defining means and ways) for the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the art. In the absence of such information it is permissible that the manner for carrying out the invention is disclosed in a source that was available to the public before the date of priority of the invention.[/size](3) It must actually be possible while carrying out any claim (or claims) by a person skilled in the art to realize the indicated special purpose (specific use) of the invention.





A14.01[2].6 As an example, when the subject matter of the claim is "perpetuum mobile" it would not be recognized as complying with requirement (3) even where the international application complies with requirement (2), since it operates contrary to the well-established physical laws. Requirement (3) is also deemed not to have been complied with in cases of technical errors which are not necessarily linked with basic laws of nature but nevertheless result in a failure of the claimed subject matter to be usable for the special purpose indicated by the applicant.



From this I can see that the WIPO will not grant a patent to Holcomb, irrespective of whether the device works or not, as he claims the device is self running which is a definition of perpetuum mobile.


Without a patent protecting the IP, mainstream investment sources  will not finance it.


L192

[listener192]

Never say you are sorry for helping to provide facts! The only reason you feel disappointed in this interview is because he has made huge claims and still not really showing much to us. That's on him, not you. Please keep sharing anything you can!


Something interesting I'm getting from his interview is that what he has is simply a transformer. I know, it sounds stupid, but this is what I am hearing from him. He is just hooking it inline. I added a quick sketch of something extremely simple that every one of us already knows about, and it just seems to fit exactly his claims here.
Clearly, I could be wrong, but this does fit his description.

The cogeneration patent US20120007708A1 is hard to understand but my interpretation is that it was taking the neutral returns from a normally connected wye motor and connecting them to coils in the induction rotor of his device before returning them to the line neutral.

The idea is that he can generate say three phase power on the stator of his device without increasing the power  into the motor or reducing its power output.

Somewhat like having transformers in the neutral legs of the motor wye connection, so if you load the transformer secondary you lower the impedance of the primary which ensures motor current is maintained. However by inserting the device you raise the impedance prior to loading, even though he used heavy gauge wire to minimise the I/R losses.

Unless the device does not manifest lenz current I can't see how this would work. If the device did not manifest lenz current, why would you need to go to the trouble of connecting it in this fashion.

Looking at  all the filings for US20120007708A1 on the USPTO site, Holcomb went through an extensive rejection process for this application US20120007708A1. Eventually he got the application published but then he went through a similar rejection process as the USPTO reviewed the application. Eventually he gave up, as the documents show the application was abandoned due to Holcomb failing to respond to USPTO requests for information.


L192

[ramset]

GK did share this at Peter's Forum (Over unity research)
https://holcombenergysystems.com/technology-breakthrough/
I am uncertain if link or similar was posted here .
Respectfully submitted
Chet K

[captainpecan]

GK did share this at Peter's Forum (Over unity research)
https://holcombenergysystems.com/technology-breakthrough/
I am uncertain if link or similar was posted here .
Respectfully submitted
Chet K

I see they made the completely off grid claim again in theory 2nd system. I'm a little confused as to why they didn't show that system or talk about it in the interview. I'm curious as to why they are still paying the power company at all and only claiming a percentage of savings? I'm wondering if their self looping version isn't really working. I'm wondering if they are seeking funding to go further and he BELIEVES it will self loop.
I am not understanding why he isn't showing us the best part working. Wouldn't that help get him his funding? If I had a self looper and wanted funding, I would be showing the hell out of it! I'm wondering what's up.