Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[onepower]

Bistander

I see no problem or contradiction. If you search (as I did in Google) for rotating magnetic field animation, you'll find hundreds of visual aids. And I also came across this proof.
https://www.yourelectricalguide.com/2017/07/rotating-magnetic-field-in-three-phase-induction-motor.html

I agree and my mind was wondering off on another tangent again, it was also 2am...

I'm still working on the flowing magnetism problem and it's a real mind bender. The problem relates to a lack of true field rotation because the magnetic field is a property of space separate from the source. It can expand/contract from the source and move with it but not rotate with it.

I'm still trying to produce a true field rotation but I haven't quite put all the pieces together yet.

Regards
AC

[rakarskiy]

I found an interesting project, just on the topic of a static electric generator with a rotating electric field:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4qOE5XBbbk&t=12s 

Electronic control, movement of the poles of the magnetic field in the static core of the stator.
The placement of the outer and inner core with grooves is logically correct.
There is another core in the Holcomb system, the generator core is wound inside, between the switched magnetic circuits.

If you look at a rotor with two pairs of poles (four poles), you can see how the electromagnets should activate.

For the magnetic circuit: it must be remembered that the magnetic circuit (flux) can be folded and closed. In this case, Ohm's law for the magnetic circuit cannot be neglected.

[rakarskiy]

Ufopolitics!
This is a drawing from Figuère's first patent.
I clarified a little, and the 1908 patent is more of a convention for designating a controller system

I supplemented the drawing with a comparison of the Figuera generator of 1902, and the modern design of the four-pole generator design. But the electromagnets in the external and internal circuits must work synchronously.
Sincerely!

[F6FLT]

Hi Rakarskiy

I read with interest what you said about the Holcomb technology. You linked it to Figuera's patent, which seems relevant, but very worrying since after more than a century we do not have any machine working according to Figuera's plan today. So won't we have any with Holcomb in 2122 either?

The problem with Holcomb is that in his patent, the energy is claimed to come from electron spin. So by talking about spin, Holcomb is relying on academic science to justify the extra energy produced.

If one considers the academic science incorrect, then the explanation by the spin does not make sense, and only the demonstration of the extra-energy by facts that everyone can observe and reproduce, is indispensable.

If we consider academic science correct, then :
- the imputation of extra-energy to electron spin is not valid since its mathematical formalism forbids the creation of energy in a closed system.
- or the imputation of extra-energy to the electron spin is valid but then the spin is only an intermediary capturing energy from elsewhere, so that Holcomb's explanation is incomplete and the real source of energy remains unknown
- or Holcomb ignores the source of the extra-energy, he just observes it, and he provides a bogus explanation in order to justify the extra-energy and make it credible for patentability and investors.

But what I see everywhere about Holcomb are digressions on magnetic fields and their couplings, based on the known rules of electromagnetism, which in no case can give rise to extra-energy.

As with all claims of overunity, there is a need to check the facts first. The problem with Holcomb's machine is that it is already an industrial machine, without proof of concept, i.e. without a simple setup based on the underlying principle involved in the phenomenon.
What would that principle be? What could be the elementary setup that would demonstrate it, even if it only produces a few mW?

I think this is the main interesting question. What is your analysis?

[Lunkster]

Hello Again,

I have been researching Dr. Robert Holcomb's past activities and am finding it fascinating.
Not only has he had many patents but companies as well.
He has had legal battles over some of his patent rights which were battled out in court.
There are so many interesting twists and turns.
All of it would make a great motion picture that could be called

"The Life and Times of Dr. Robert Holcomb"

There are always two side of any story and that is why his life would make such a great story.
It is a great story whether these current inventions are a scam or for real.
It would be great if the story ending up in the air where you do not know the true answer
at the end of the movie.

Even though Dr. Robert Holcomb has had such an interesting life.  I have not seen any evidence
that his inventions in the past or present are a scam.  But that is just my opinion.

If someone knows someone in Hollywood, please get in contact with them.

Think of it this way,  Hollywood is a fast way to let the world to know what is going on in the OU
community.  By the time the movie came out,  we would already know if these current inventions are valid or not.

Either way,  his life is what Hollywood was made for.

Lunkster