Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 63 Guests are viewing this topic.

pix

Quote from: rakarskiy on June 10, 2022, 02:50:04 AM
Hello SolarLab!

Probably not on the same wavelength. Everything is simple for me, the circuit engineering approach is secondary, and the processes in the circuit elements are primary. Until I get to the bottom of the primary, the latter is meaningless.
So it is with the stator system of a synchronous generator or a Holcomb static generator. What is the meaning of modeling inaccuracies? These are mistakes, even if they seem to be true.

In the system Kapanadze, Mark et al. are sure that there is electrostatic induction. It is this section in physics that seems to exist, but it is hushed up.

Link to document not solved in "how it works" answer:  http://www.sergey-osetrov.narod.ru/Projects/Boiler/Clever_transformer_from_Zacarinin.pdf

Good luck to you, in the ordeals of the search for truth.


Zacarinin is 1:1 transformer. Very peculiar.
But nobody claimed any OU from it.


Cheers,
Pix

rakarskiy

Quote from: pix on June 10, 2022, 02:58:10 AM

Zacarinin is 1:1 transformer. Very peculiar.
But nobody claimed any OU from it.


Cheers,
Pix

pix,  what your education is?

Sergey Borisovich is a peculiar fellow. EMF transfer coefficient, called the indicator of power transfer from the first circuit to the second. I like his humor. He gave enough data to calculate the real picture.
Not a single "quarter-wave radio operator" has done this on Russian-language forums. And Sergei Borisovich's joke was taken for granted.

But maybe Sergey Borisovich was absolutely right. His device is not a converter, but an inductor. An electrostatic inductor, the task of which is to polarize to a potential difference, a wire in the second circuit? The electrostatic inductor is a revolution that destroys all modern concepts of energy, including Free Energy.

His data: 1 ampere and 4 volts in the secondary circuit under load, on the graph the amplitude value, voltage with an already completed drop of 4 volts, in the primary and secondary circuits. Source resistance 50 Ohm. These data are sufficient to make an elementary calculation. Without taking into account the resistance of the primary winding and the metal rod of the secondary circuit.
In the attachment

So here is my opinion, that no power is transferred in the Cunning Transformer, this is a vivid example of an electrostatic induction device on a conductor in an electric field. The current is the result of work in the second circuit, with a drop, and in the primary circuit it is simply a reflection of the connection between the electric field of the reactor and the conductor.

Trust can only be verified. At least check the calculation or the original data.

pix

Quote from: rakarskiy on June 10, 2022, 04:12:02 AM
pix,  what your education is?


My education is enough to know that a crank mechanical press is not OU  ;D
Regarding Zacarinin transformer- how do you measure Pin and Pout at kHZ frequencies ? By lamp brightness? The only proper way to measure Pout is by calorimetric measure of rectified current.


So many OU devices here, but surprisingly I don't see any one of them around me. ;D


Cheers,
Pix


rakarskiy

Quote from: pix on June 10, 2022, 08:43:02 AM
My education is enough to know that a crank mechanical press is not OU  ;D
Regarding Zacarinin transformer- how do you measure Pin and Pout at kHZ frequencies ? By lamp brightness? The only proper way to measure Pout is by calorimetric measure of rectified current.
So many OU devices here, but surprisingly I don't see any one of them around me. ;D
Cheers,
Pix

Pix, you can convince the presence of OU or the opposite as much as you like, but numbers are a stubborn thing.
Just a slide and author's data. It is the business of skeptics to measure, but I see what the algorithm considers, based on Ohm's Law.

Good luck, everyone is in their own state of belief.

pix

Quote from: rakarskiy on June 10, 2022, 08:57:07 AM
Pix, you can convince the presence of OU or the opposite as much as you like, but numbers are a stubborn thing.
Just a slide and author's data. It is the business of skeptics to measure, but I see what the algorithm considers, based on Ohm's Law.

Good luck, everyone is in their own state of belief.
Even looking at the scope a hell  lot of an OU there  :D
Anyway, as I said- the only true measurement  in such kHZ range is calorimetric measurement of dissipated power.
Zacarina "transformer" is known since 2008. It is easy to replicate.
Don't you think that if there would be any OU it would be everywhere already? Every Joe Sixpack would run it in the backyard?
And instead burning coal, gas and oil every industrial power plant would utilise a crank presses on the large scale? ;D


Ok, I am done. Enjoy your quest for a Holy Grail of Overunity.
I will go my way.


Cheers,
Pix