Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

More food for thought!
I ask materialists not to faint, there is no charge as a particle here!

[Lunkster]

See Graph

Hi,

I have some questions looking at this graph!!!!!!!!!!

If a factory has a period time, like the plant is not in production for a week for
Christmas break, will there be no electrical savings if the buildings power usage is
below the constant usage in the graph of the HES system?  What I mean is will the
HES system then be the same cost as without the HES system during plant low usage times?

Does the technology need a minimal electrical usage before the system
has a COP > 1?

Could the replications of the Holcomb systems being tested below the threshold
of producing a COP > 1 be a COP>1 if they were tested to a larger load, would they then
come into the range of the HAS systems?

How can the current be so constant with changing loads?
Does the system use a battery backup system to store power on days of
little usage and then draws power from the batteries on high usage days?

Does the system store power to the battery banks at night when power is
lower cost and during the day draws power from the batteries when the
cost of electricity is more expensive in order to lower the overall cost
of the factory?

Lunkster

[pmgr]

More food for thought!
I ask materialists not to faint, there is no charge as a particle here!

Rakker, you have a problem with your units in your table, see my image. That should be [volt], not [ampere].
And better check the rest of the table as well as there are more mistakes. I leave it up to you to find them.

[rakarskiy]

Why? Only because official physics decided so.
A volt is a unit of measurement of an electric field, which is related to the Coulomb force of electricity and the "movement" of the electric field at the moment of its vortex state (EMF). Volts is a measure of an electric field, or rather to practice the potential difference of an electric potential for a circuit?
Amps are the "electrical" measurement of a vortex magnetic field. This unit of measurement is directly related to the magnetic field rotating around the conductor.
That's why I put it in its place. Everything falls into place.
If you don't agree, justify! )


The connection between the magnetic field and the electric field is in Ohm's law, where, in fact, the effect of balancing the difference in electric potentials through the formation of a vortex magnetic flux is calculated, provided that the vortex magnetic flux is capable of conduction. The electric field in a conductor is always a surface component of the field. To balance the electrical potentials, a medium is needed and this is not the material of the conductor, but a vortex magnetic field that it can form in this material. I(A) = U(V) / R(ohm)

Vortex magnetic field and electric field, plasma structured formations of the visible and invisible spectrum.

[alan]

dphi/dt=emf[v] 
u0=henry/meter 
henry=dphi/di 
You say dq/dt=henry/meter * dphi/dt but the units don't match.

Why do you think I/u0=volt or I=u0 * volt?