Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

Dear "experts in the field of electrical machines": hidden, secret, explicit and other (...) that is in the service of the system!

Answer two questions.

1. How is the mechanical power (Pk=Fv) applied to the generator shaft converted into electrical power (Pe=IU), which is measured at the generator terminals?
2. How is EMF induced in the generator conductor, which is laid in the generator groove? What is needed is not figurative reasoning, but exact processes with a mathematical description of the entire period of the sinusoidal EMF signal.

This will be enough. If you cannot, then complain to the  reform league that you were interrogated by me about your professional suitability, evaluate something, conduct examinations in the field of electromagnetic-mechanical or solid-state machines.

Sincerely.

Hi rakarskiy,
I would be doing nothing more than teaching existing common knowledge on the subjects which you can easily find in textbooks, educational courses, on-line tutorials and other literature. So excuse me for not attempting here in this format. It is difficult enough in classroom settings and you have behaved similar to a unruly student. I do admire your ambition however recommend peer review prior to publishing.
bi

[Ufopolitics]

[...]...The ILPG is identical to a fixed-rotor, slip ring motor.  It is powered by 3-phase AC mains...[...]

That statement above is very wrong, and it just describes the type of poor knowledge, the person(s) who did it, have.

It is very well known (again, by people skilled in the arts) that the type of windings, basically related to number of turns and gauge of wires in a Motor is completely OPPOSITE to those in a Generator!!!

And really, it don't matter what type of Motor or Generator we will be talking about...they all differ in their windings spec's.

A Generator Stator Output windings are wound with thick gauge windings, to have higher currents flowing, also, distributed in specific ways along the stator core in order to capture as much as possible, the 360º rotating field.
A Motor Stator is the TOTAL OPPOSITE than a Generator!!...since it is ON at all times during motoring operation, it is wound with higher resistance wire, MUCH thinner gauge than a Generator Stator. As also, the winding distribution along the core is designed in order to force the rotor to spin.

And now, talking about a specific 3 Phase Motor....The Rotor is also designed to be ON at all times during motor op...so, then, it also must be wound in a way that can stand being energized for long periods of time without becoming a resistor from an electric stove, or melting red hot.

So, how can we even conceive that just locking up a 3 Phase Motor Rotor, it would be generating more power out, like a Generator does?

How can we even write on this Forum, that HES is "identical" to a 3 Phase Motor with a locked Rotor??!!

Unless it is done deliberately, with just the purpose to prove wrong a very dedicated and elaborated invention and its development.


Ufopolitics

[Beginners Mind]

I understand the reluctance of forum members to believe reports from anonymous witnesses.  Apologies for not mentioning names.  I am not authorized to do so. 

Regardless, I felt it was important to post this information because so many people on this forum are placing such high hopes on the ILPG.  I don't want them to be heartbroken, as I am, should they discover the ILPG does not produce power. 

A few points of clarification in reply to comments:

There is no defamation of anyone at HES in this issue.  They are sincere, honest people by all accounts.  They fully believe their meters are correctly connected and are not attempting to fool or defraud anyone.  They do not realize they have made an error.

It is important to remember that the ILPG does not at all resemble HES's patented technology.  The ILPG is identical in configuration to a fixed-rotor slip ring motor.  The patented technology is not that at all.  Don't confuse them.  HES jumped horses around the beginning of the year, possibly because the ILPG is vastly easier to manufacture and they truly believe it works.           

Power in and out are at 60 HZ.  Current amplification is measurably repeatable.  However, with the phase shift involved, there is no associated amplification of power when metered correctly. 

DNV-GL witness verification was done on the patent-applied-for technology in WO2021063522A1, not for the ILPG.  Further, DNV-GL did not do their own metering, simply verified what they witnesses with the metering that was present.  Regardless, that prior technology is not at issue.  It very well may work.

No witness verification of the ILPG has been made public except for a short clip in one of the original HES YouTube videos.  And that simply verified the numbers on the HES meters shown in the clip. 

FPL graphs showing decrease in power are for 22 days only.  Why no longer?  Why have there been no other publicly posted results of decreased electric bills?  No information about load is provided for those 22 days.  No information about whether power factor correction was in use in the facility prior to ILPG installation.  The ILPG can correct power factor depending on its configuration.  The hypothesis is that power factor correction is responsible for this result.

No one would be happier than me or the witnesses I've spoken with to see an reputable, independent third party test the ILPG with their own meters and prove that the ILPG produces real power, and that the observations of the witnesses I've spoken with are wrong.  Knowing the qualifications of the witnesses as I do, however, I believe their assessment will hold up. 

[SolarLab]

I do not rely on Holcomb's data, but on the experiments that were carried out with my participation (according to my recommendations).


https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/static-electromagnetic-transducer.html

Hi Rakarskiy,

Quick questions - (1) Your ROTOR has a metal core, correct (maybe obvious but maybe not) and - (2) Do you know
the type of metal used in the Stator and Rotor (electrical steel, also known as motor steel)?

Thanks,  SL

Youv'e probably posted all the information somewhere but I'm too lazy to look right now!

[SolarLab]

I understand the reluctance of forum members to believe reports from anonymous witnesses.  Apologies for not mentioning names.  I am not authorized to do so. 

Regardless, I felt it was important to post this information because so many people on this forum are placing such high hopes on the ILPG.  I don't want them to be heartbroken, as I am, should they discover the ILPG does not produce power. 

A few points of clarification in reply to comments:

There is no defamation of anyone at HES in this issue.  They are sincere, honest people by all accounts.  They fully believe their meters are correctly connected and are not attempting to fool or defraud anyone.  They do not realize they have made an error.

It is important to remember that the ILPG does not at all resemble HES's patented technology.  The ILPG is identical in configuration to a fixed-rotor slip ring motor.  The patented technology is not that at all.  Don't confuse them.  HES jumped horses around the beginning of the year, possibly because the ILPG is vastly easier to manufacture and they truly believe it works.           

Power in and out are at 60 HZ.  Current amplification is measurably repeatable.  However, with the phase shift involved, there is no associated amplification of power when metered correctly. 

DNV-GL witness verification was done on the patent-applied-for technology in WO2021063522A1, not for the ILPG.  Further, DNV-GL did not do their own metering, simply verified what they witnesses with the metering that was present.  Regardless, that prior technology is not at issue.  It very well may work.

No witness verification of the ILPG has been made public except for a short clip in one of the original HES YouTube videos.  And that simply verified the numbers on the HES meters shown in the clip. 

FPL graphs showing decrease in power are for 22 days only.  Why no longer?  Why have there been no other publicly posted results of decreased electric bills?  No information about load is provided for those 22 days.  No information about whether power factor correction was in use in the facility prior to ILPG installation.  The ILPG can correct power factor depending on its configuration.  The hypothesis is that power factor correction is responsible for this result.

No one would be happier than me or the witnesses I've spoken with to see an reputable, independent third party test the ILPG with their own meters and prove that the ILPG produces real power, and that the observations of the witnesses I've spoken with are wrong.  Knowing the qualifications of the witnesses as I do, however, I believe their assessment will hold up.

So Florida Power and Light only lied for 22 days - good, at least that part is cleared up!

One thing for sure - that's one hell of a Power Factor Correction...