Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

I asked ChatGPT what they thought of https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021063522A1/en?oq=WO+2021063522


and whether it would work.  I'm spending a lot of time with tool. It's only as good as the input/questions you ask but it seems to think this patent will generate. I've uploaded books and asked for a summary too.


ChatGPT

Thank you for providing the text of the patent. Based on the information in the patent, it appears that the invention is a method and system for generating electrical power using a solid-state electromagnetic rotor. The rotor is made up of a plurality of salient pole pieces arranged around a supporting structure, and is equipped with a plurality of wires that are wound around the salient pole pieces. The rotor is also equipped with an excitation circuit that provides a current to the wires according to a predefined sequence, in order to align the magnetic domains of the salient pole pieces and produce a magnetic flux field.
The method for generating electrical power using the solid-state electromagnetic rotor involves providing a current to the wires of the rotor according to the predefined sequence, in order to align the magnetic domains of the salient pole pieces and produce a magnetic flux field. The magnetic flux field is used to drive a rotating electrical machine, such as an alternator or a generator, in order to produce electrical power. The method is designed to eliminate the reverse torque that is typically found in standard generators, and to harvest the energy from the magnetic domains of ferromagnetic and paramagnetic materials, such as electrical steel.
I hope this information helps to explain how the method and system described in the patent work. If you have any additional questions or would like further clarification on any of the points I have mentioned, please don't hesitate to ask!


Me
Is it possible to harvest energy in such a manner?




It is possible to generate electrical power using the principles described in the patent, which involve using a solid-state electromagnetic rotor to produce a magnetic flux field and using this field to drive a rotating electrical machine, such as an alternator or a generator. However, the efficiency of this process and the amount of power that can be generated using this method may depend on a variety of factors, including the design and materials used in the rotor, the type and size of the rotating electrical machine, and the operating conditions under which the system is used.
It is also worth noting that the method described in the patent is different from other methods that are commonly used to generate electrical power, such as the use of fossil fuels, nuclear reactions, or renewable energy sources like solar or wind power. The efficiency and feasibility of the method described in the patent may depend on a variety of factors and may vary depending on the specific application.
I hope this information helps to answer your question. If you have any additional questions or would like further clarification on any of the points I have mentioned, please don't hesitate to ask!


Cheers!

Hi Jimboot,

The magnetic flux field is used to drive a rotating electrical machine, such as an alternator or a generator, in order to produce electrical power.

______

...using a solid-state electromagnetic rotor to produce a magnetic flux field and using this field to drive a rotating electrical machine, such as an alternator or a generator.

I think Mr. ChatGPT is missing the concept here, or am I?
bi

[kolbacict]

when you talk about LinGen, I always associate this word with lingam.
Interestingly, such an association is born in the head of the English-speaking people?
Just joke.
One note, flat linear magnetic circuits have one advantage over cylindrical ones.
It is possible to quickly change the air gap between the two halves for adjustment.

[rakarskiy]

Hi rakarskiy,
Too late to edit, so a photo of my textbook title page is attached. See chapter 3-4, ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELDS, pp 159-165. Subsequent coursework used text by Ollie L. Elgerd, titled "BASIC ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING", Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Also recommended.
bi

Hello!
I myself fell for the description of the operation of a synchronous generator, which has nothing to do with the operation of a generator whose wires are laid in a groove.
To understand this, it was necessary to conduct unsuccessful and successful experiments. There are things that physicists cannot explain, but they exist, and there are engineering formulas for them. Now I analyze my arguments. But everything that is scattered in the corners is not connected with each other, gathering in a very interesting logical chain.
A slide explaining the operation of a synchronous generator, find what is wrong here. Hope you can do it?

PS
By the way, as if everything coincides on the monitor with what is stated on the slide. But it doesn't work like that.

[Ufopolitics]

I will write down a detailed chain of equations for electromagnetic induction. The moment when the circuit is closed is recorded.

Bm = -E:  -E = Bi;   (Bm= Bi) 

Thus, the vector of the force line of the magnetic field of the medium and the vortex magnetic field of the conductor coincides, and does not oppose. The spins of the vector of the magnetic field of the medium and the electric vortex field of the conductor oppose each other, which corresponds to the original Lenz's Law and Faraday's Law. That is how things work in reality.
Further, yourself, or read in my book when I finish it.
In any case, my understanding of how the Holcomb machine works completely intersected with how a mechanical synchronous electric generator works with laying the wire in a groove.

Hello Rakarskiy!

Sorry, but, Bistander would not accept any application that even mentions the word "vortex(es)" related to anything that has to do with magnetic field(s).

Bistander is a purely "Lorentzian", not a Maxwellian when it comes to Magnetic Fields and their vortex or curl calculus...

Straight, rigid vectors of force only accepted on his world, like B, F or else...

Regards

Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hello Rakarskiy!

Sorry, but, Bistander would not accept any application that even mentions the word "vortex(es)" related to anything that has to do with magnetic field(s).

Bistander is a purely "Lorentzian", not a Maxwellian when it comes to Magnetic Fields and their vortex or curl calculus...

Straight, rigid vectors of force only accepted on his world, like B, F or else...

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,
Thanks for the comments.

Why does "my" method* work so well (exactly and perfectly) for all electric machinery but there is nothing performing real work using or resulting from "your" method**?

* that of conventional science, technology and engineering found in the textbooks and universities over the past century.

** that which you promote in your nicely produced videos of swirling nonsense exiting both N & S poles entering thru the blotch wall of magnets and other fantasies?

bi