Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

If the time has not come to realize everything, do not rush.
I won't insist.
Why is the transformer not "OU"? there is also flux linkage and an increase in the magnetic flux in the core.
By the way, the simulator does not correctly calculate the flux linkage in the transformer when the primary and secondary are wound over the first. The simulator will show you that the field is not in the kernel, but it is.
Any program is an episode of mathematical calculation based on the understanding of the operator's processes.

Here's a link to an OUR post to a fellow regarding CAE simulation that you might find interesting as you ponder your
belief that "the simulator does not correctly calculate the flux linkage..."

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg103267#msg103267

Also, the simulators I use do not seem to have any problems providing very accurate results throughout
pretty much any EM structure. Some preliminary results have been posted both here and at OUR.

You claim the simulator doesn't function as expected but I can not varify that since you do not specify what simulator
you are refering to nor present any examples or references.

The subject of transformer "OU" has been discussed probably a dozen times both here and in the OUR thread so I won't
address it again.

Hey, you may well have a correct method of anlyzing the HES devices, BUT also consider there may be more than one method
that works equally well, or possibly even better.

I have not looked into your approach in detail since I have not really seen it yet anywhere. And, I have a method that already
works for me. Plus many others are getting varifyable results with this method as well.

CAE accounts for the many parameters internally and provides results. The basic output characteristics are built-in, others are
on demand, while a full function calculator is available for any exotic mathematical calculations. For a typical analysis there's no
need to do mathematical calculations - you simply enter your physical 3D model and set the input parameters (Voltage or Current
and Signal timing sequences). This avoids any mathematical errors and ensures the problem is set up properly.

[rakarskiy]

Hello SL!

The magnetic circuit, the programs consider it very well (there are deviations, but this is rather the reason for the correct data entry, they all have the same methodology).
There are many other things that systems don't take into account. These algorithms are probably the technological know-how of certain design bureaus. Design offices develop real devices, and it is impossible that the developers do not know the exact principle of operation.
In my previous post ( https://studbooks.net/2116779/matematika_himiya_fizika/raschet_sinhronnogo_generatora)

Currently, synchronous generators are the main source of electricity. Their power ranges from a few kilowatts to hundreds of thousands of kilowatts. Synchronous generators are installed in thermal and hydroelectric power plants, aircraft, ships, they are equipped with various mobile sources of electricity.

The main properties of a synchronous generator are given by the characteristics that determine the relationship between the voltage at the armature terminals, the excitation current, the load current at rated speed and a constant power factor in steady state. I posted a design algorithm for calculating a synchronous generator. But there is no what and how happens in the generator. There are dependencies. Before you can understand how Holcomb systems work, you need to know perfectly the source of operation of a synchronous electromechanical generator.

The design of an electrical machine is an ambiguous task, since the number of initial calculation equations describing electromagnetic connections in it is less than the number of unknown quantities. Therefore, the nominal data can be provided with various ratios of the main dimensions and electromagnetic loads of the machine. The optimal result largely depends on the experience of the designer and is usually achieved by comparing several options. As a universal criterion of optimality, the minimum of total costs is most often taken, i.e. cost of materials, manufacturing and operation costs. Operating costs, in turn, depend on efficiency, power factor, quality, maintainability and a number of other factors.

To design, you first need to know exactly how a synchronous mechanical power generator works. They have a common algorithm with Holcomb.


As for the Holcomb system in the dimension of the power bank, I expressed my opinion, it is based on research on symmetrical Holcomb models. I found my bug, I don't think what I listed as a bug Holcomb has as a working technology. But I do not insist that I am right, I just expressed my opinion.

Sincerely!

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All,

Yes Rakarskiy, I agree that the most important "components" of a Generator are hidden from public view, and that includes the exact and precise "know how" to design and build them.
And of course the Manufacturers of Generators must know all these Algorithms, the Formulas, etc,etc...but it is obvious is NOT on Public Domain.

And here I will point out to ,maybe, one of the most important parts or STAGE of a Generator, that we ALL may have overlooked. As it is present in ANY Generator on the Market.

THE EXCITER SYSTEMS

Even a small, 800 Watts, single phase Home Generator have an Exciter System. And on the huge, Industrial types, the Exciter System is even more complex.

And regardless of the type of Rotation we try to do, whether physical-mechanical or Solid State, (which I call it "Virtual Rotation or Displacement of the Field")...
WE WILL ALWAYS NEED TO HAVE AN EXCITER SYSTEM, before We start Rotation of the Field.

Over the years I have noticed every single failed attempt to run an Overunity Generator (including myself, on Figuera and a similar to HES System)...We have always try doing it STRAIGHT FORWARD, without an Exciter System "in between".
So, We have ZERO PRE-AMP STAGE, We are just running our Input Power DIRECTLY to the Generator Main Components. Fighting it to try to achieve excess energy...and we will NEVER, EVER do it that way!!

An Exciter System on a Generator NEVER TURNS OFF during its Operation!!...So, it is not like a "Starter Motor" works on an ICE Engine, that once Engine starts, it shuts down completely...absolutely NOT!!
On the contrary, IF  we take off or simply disconnect the Exciter System from absolutely ANY Generator, it would never, ever generate ANY Output, no matter how fast we speed up the Magnetic Field!!
The Exciter System on a Generator is in charge to AMPLIFY/MULTIPLY the Currents and Voltage that go to the Main Generator Rotor for Output, by just simple Rotation of the Magnetic Field, at ALL TIMES DURING OPERATION!!

So, no matter what type of Rotation of the Field we try to design and build...We always need to have an Exciter System there.

So, I highly believe, in order to be successful, We must work harder than anywhere else, on that particular, but essential component of a Generator.

IMHO, the Exciter System are the "Pistons" we all have been looking for...or the "Gain Mechanism(s)" to reach Overunity or Excess of Energy over our Inputs.

I will leave it here...is up to you all to follow my advice or just ignore it...I will prove my point very soon.


Ufopolitics

Edit 1: On the Image is shown a THREE STAGE EXCITER SYSTEM including the Main Generator Rotor Coils "Field" on img+Exciter Stator Coils at "Armature" (as written on image shown) for a 3 phase Generator from 100 to 200 Kw...please realize that "Field Rotation" could be done either Physically or Virtually...

[bistander]

...
(including the Main Generator Rotor Coils (Field)+Exciter Stator Coils at Armature)
...

Ufo,
The Exciter Stator Coils are its Field, not its Armature.
bi

[SolarLab]

Hi Fellows,

Not being that familiar with conventional generators or motors I appreciate all your insight.

However, after studying the HES to some extent I think I will go with Dr. Holcomb's disclosures
as outlined below from his Technical Summary, also attached.

A Partial Quote from the last paragraph on page 2. of this document:

"Aligning and relaxing the alignment of the magnetic domains does nothing to the electrical steel. All
generators operate by taking advantage of this alignment mechanism. However, the standard generator
rotor only aligns the domains one time at start-up, and then gets no further energy advantage from the
aligning process. In comparison, the HES aligns the domains and relaxes the alignment, and re-aligns and
relaxes continuously every 4 milliseconds. Therefore we get the magnification effect 250 times per second."

Dr. Holcomb has also mentioned the "250 times per second re-alignment" on several occassions and in other comments. On
it's face this sequence and technique appears to make sense as well.

Analysis of the HES Controller does not show any "always ON" scheme, that I could find, however there may be part of the
circuit in one of the patents, I believe, that is designed to capture BEMF.

(Sorry for the "red text" but this board does not have a convienient underline that I can find - resizing images to fit is my limit)

SL