Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

I wish you good experiments! May you succeed!

Thanks! And, hey, we still need your book!

SL

[bistander]

Hi SL,
Please confirm that I am understanding your sequencing the way you intend it to operate. For reference, I attach a cropped image of the sequence drivers and coils from your diagram linked in the quoted post. You have 8 coils, 8 drivers, one coil per tooth and 4 teeth per pole and therefore 2 poles. The top 4 coils are only pulsed in the shown polarity such that the top pole, using coils 1 - 4,  will always be North. And conversely, coils 5 - 8 on the bottom pole will always make that pole South. Am I reading this correctly?
...

Hi SL,
I read thru the our.com stuff like 6 months ago. I'll read it again.
But please, can't you give me a yes or no answer?

Am I reading this correctly?

Thanks,
bi

[SolarLab]

See this link regarding how the pulsing works:

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg572781/#msg572781

I can not answer yes or no to whether you understand the diagram or not.

Timing was taken from the patent for the CAE analysis simulation proof-of-concepts. Results are shown
in the links provided.

If you want to argue about the nomenclature, etc. - forget it - I'm not interested and don't care!

Regards,

SL

[SolarLab]

Hi SL,
Please confirm that I am understanding your sequencing the way you intend it to operate. For reference, I attach a cropped image of the sequence drivers and coils from your diagram linked in the quoted post. You have 8 coils, 8 drivers, one coil per tooth and 4 teeth per pole and therefore 2 poles. The top 4 coils are only pulsed in the shown polarity such that the top pole, using coils 1 - 4,  will always be North. And conversely, coils 5 - 8 on the bottom pole will always make that pole South. Am I reading this correctly?

If so, this is a significant departure from Holcomb's description of sequence found in the patent application for the 16 tooth 2 & 4 pole rotors (circular). I do not believe the method represents a linear version of the RMF (Rotating Magnetic Field).

If in fact each pole does not swing polarity (N to S to N to S ...) then there are implications seen on the B H curve.

Your comments would be appreciated.
bi

bistander,

Now that you have had a chance to study the "LinGen" a bit; please expand on you claim:

"If in fact each pole does not swing polarity (N to S to N to S ...) then there are implications seen on the B H curve."

Hey, you never know, it might have some merrit and be important to the overall progress of this development. Hope so!

Looking forward to your "B-H Curve" analysis with respect to the "LinGen" scheme. Take as many pages as you need. Always
willing to learn more - that's how we get from here-to-there. Thanks in advance.

Regards,

SL

[bistander]

bistander,

Now that you have had a chance to study the "LinGen" a bit; please expand on you claim:

"If in fact each pole does not swing polarity (N to S to N to S ...) then there are implications seen on the B H curve."

Hey, you never know, it might have some merrit and be important to the overall progress of this development. Hope so!

Looking forward to your "B-H Curve" analysis with respect to the "LinGen" scheme. Take as many pages as you need. Always
willing to learn more - that's how we get from here-to-there. Thanks in advance.

Regards,

SL

Hi SL,
Do you realize that the steel would be working on minor loops regarding the B H characteristics?

Are you still using the grade which you specified earlier?
bi