Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvamIRUSbYE&t=0s  (!)

The author of the video (!) came in handy with my drawing! By the way, there is a point in the figure explaining the operation of the generator, if you know exactly the principle of EMF guidance.
The same principle as applied in the first synchronous generator, the very first one.
Perhaps the first generator was invented by an Irishman and ... .

Here is my intrigue for you!

[Dog-One]

Here is my intrigue for you!

So do you think the concept of moving an established magnetic field is where the gain mechanism manifests?

The late Tom Bearden used to stress, "Don't kill the dipole."  I'm thinking by just slightly shifting a magnetic field instead of building and collapsing this field would indeed decrease the input power needed.  If that also allows the same output power to continue, then unity gain should be easy and more than unity gain possible.

To me though, there is still one more piece of the puzzle I'm unclear about--timing.  I think you must shift the field quicker than the magnetic domains can respond.  If you do it at the same speed or slower, then you lose the gain mechanism.  To me, this is why mechanical generators, even though they are basis for the HES device, cannot show the gain mechanism.  With mechanical generators, the field and the magnetic domains are in lock step with each other.  With the HES, there is a time compression during the shift where the magnet domains simply cannot keep up.  The domains lag behind the virtual field and when that happens, this anomaly is exposed.

[SolarLab]

New video. Does the Holcomb Energy System violate the laws of Thermodynamics?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVVxUcuX65w


A Fantastic Energy Breakthrough for the Future!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvamIRUSbYE&t=0s


Professor Timothy Vaughan, toward the end of videos says he has done personally verification.

Feb2006,

Thanks for the video links - quite interesting and well done.
Curious "ratchet" postulation!

Have a good one.
SL

[Ufopolitics]

So do you think the concept of moving an established magnetic field is where the gain mechanism manifests?

The late Tom Bearden used to stress, "Don't kill the dipole."  I'm thinking by just slightly shifting a magnetic field instead of building and collapsing this field would indeed decrease the input power needed.  If that also allows the same output power to continue, then unity gain should be easy and more than unity gain possible.

Hello Dog-One,

Great post man!!
I believe by just rotating the field virtually is not the full gain mechanism...although it is a great part of it.
And yes, you are also right, building to then collapse the field is not a way to achieve great results, I have done it before, and it did not played the full gain mech.
Slightly shifting the Field is the way to go, and I will add to shift only minimal portions of the whole field, is what Cotnoir called "higher resolution"

To me though, there is still one more piece of the puzzle I'm unclear about--timing.  I think you must shift the field quicker than the magnetic domains can respond.  If you do it at the same speed or slower, then you lose the gain mechanism.  To me, this is why mechanical generators, even though they are basis for the HES device, cannot show the gain mechanism.  With mechanical generators, the field and the magnetic domains are in lock step with each other.  With the HES, there is a time compression during the shift where the magnet domains simply cannot keep up.  The domains lag behind the virtual field and when that happens, this anomaly is exposed.

Wow, excellent post above!!
That is exactly the response that I got on my previous testing...the Field goes faster than the steel domains can respond, then output drops.
There is a hint to start these type of systems to get a better performance...and that is having a "pre-warming stage", where field rotates at an "idling speed" to then start acceleration smoothly up.
One thing though, I have not tested yet with the 3 phase type of rotation of the virtual field...until I do that, then I will post about it. However, I can feel it would have the same issue.
But I agree 100% with what you wrote above, that is one of the problems we need to solve.
Magnetic Field is much faster than steel mass domains response (more specifically, the response to change radical directions [180º] when swapping from N to S and from S to N), what creates a lagging in behavior and it reflects directly on the output end.

Actually we need to brake down this movement of the Field in two parts:

1- Rotation or Displacement of the virtual Magnetic Field (which is absolutely no problem to drive it at any required speed as we choose)
2- The Steel Mass Magnetic Domains response to Field changes, to amplify and propagate this moving field, strong and fast enough as to Induce Output Stator at the same speed rating as the field displacement through Spacetime.

However, IMHO, I do not think this is the actual "Gain Mechanism" even if we would be able to achieve a unison movement of both (1+2 above) whether by using lesser elements per pole (like AC 3 Ph uses) or by using an exotic, fast domain response material or any other means we discover.
IMHO, I believe the gain mech is at the Exciter level stage, just like in a Rotary Generator it does.
All Rotary Generators can start basically "from scratch", without any external input, just by rotating the field thanks to the Exciter System. However, like I wrote before...the Exciter never turns off during generator performance, so, it is not just like a starter motor on an ICE Engine, but the "Internal Power Source" of any Generator's Inducing Field.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Dog-One]

Hello Dog-One,

Great post man!!

Every once-n-while I start to see into the invisible--figured I better write it down somewhere before the thought vanishes.

I was thinking more about that ratchetting effect mentioned in the above video.  It kind of works like a slip angle.  We shift the virtual field, the magnetic domains then begin to drift to their new happy place and at the moment they are mostly aligned, we shift again.  I see this as letting the magnetic domains do the work, they do all pushing, we just persuade them to keep doing it.

So like you said, we need some kind of feedback mechanism so we don't shift until the magnetic domains have realigned.  If we shift too soon, we lose it and the magnetic domains go chaotic, requiring us to start all over.  If we lazy shift, then we lose a good portion of power doing nothing while the magnetic domains sit idle.  There's a sweet spot for sure and a decent detection system should allow us to lock into and provide feedback for an optimal cycle time control.  With a static load on the generator, we can probably get away with a static shift interval, but that will never work reliably for dynamic loads, we really need control for this, some sort of sensing mechanism to detect domain alignment.

I wonder if it's possible to ping the core with some high frequency pulse...   If we could do that, we might hear the core actually ring like a bell at some high frequency and based on the tone we get, maybe we would know when the domains have aligned.  Such a system would have to be tuned to the individual core, but I bet it would be straightforward to dial it in and once you have that, controlling the shift interval is trivial.  Then the whole system becomes self-tuned and handles anything you throw at it.