Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

Hello SolarLab!

I would not rush to conclusions: P = UI = 400V * 1A = 400W (This is a serious statement).

For such an indicator, an appropriate core is needed for the corresponding Ф=BS magnetic flux. Further, your 400V peak value should correspond to the formula E = 4.44 Фf.
You modestly kept silent about the resistance of the circuits, the cost of excitation, the places where the magnetic flux from the wires of the phase winding disappears.

I won't jump to conclusions, I'll wait for more serious tests of your generator. I hope to see a picture of the device to see the scale.

Sincerely, and I look forward to your new data, with more detailed design and calculations of the corresponding episodes of the generator.

[kolbacict]

Why does my output power taken from the rotor depend on its position inside the stator?
At what angle is it rotated inside. I think you do too.
Doesn't this mean that we consume something else from the stator besides the rotating field ?
This is direct induction as in a conventional transformer.
It is could for you to achieve that at any position of the rotor inside the stator, the output EMF does not change ?
This will mean that the energy in the secondary is available only due to the rotating field.
And nothing else.  I haven't been able to achieve it yet...

[bistander]

saliency

Having salient features, meaning a nonuniform or unsmooth shape gives different reluctance for magnetic path dependent on relative angular position causing magnitude of flux to vary.

My guess. I don't know what your parts look like. Also, isn't input to rotor and output to stator? Although in transformer it can be either way.
bi

[kolbacict]

gives different reluctance for magnetic path dependent on relative angular position causing magnitude of flux to vary.

Yes, that's how it is, perhaps.
So how do we want to use only rotation if we can't get rid of the parasitic interaction?
Or we do not know at all, what we using.

[SolarLab]

Hello SolarLab!

I would not rush to conclusions: P = UI = 400V * 1A = 400W (This is a serious statement).

For such an indicator, an appropriate core is needed for the corresponding Ф=BS magnetic flux. Further, your 400V peak value should correspond to the formula E = 4.44 Фf.
You modestly kept silent about the resistance of the circuits, the cost of excitation, the places where the magnetic flux from the wires of the phase winding disappears.

I won't jump to conclusions, I'll wait for more serious tests of your generator. I hope to see a picture of the device to see the scale.

Sincerely, and I look forward to your new data, with more detailed design and calculations of the corresponding episodes of the generator.

Hi Rakarskiy,

I agree, a little early in the development to rush to any firm conclusions, especially with respect to a detailed
theory-of-operaton or optimum performance parameters.

Since the initial investigation used several different CAE tools, I'm going to go back to the beginning analysis and
use only the lastest CAE tool. This has to be done for continuity and documentation anyway; and it might
add  bit to my limited knowledge base and tool expertise.

In the mean time, I'll wait for this groups Analytic Solutions or some results from a physical Prototype build.
Then I'll have something to reference against - which was the original intent of comparing various design approaches.

Regards,

SL

Attached a graph of "Stranded wire loss for both LAP turns and Coil turns (turns) for "turns" - Linear step from
10 to 700, step=50; and "lap_turns" - Linear step from 1 to 400, step=30. This relates to your "wire_R" question
I believe. You can see why a simple answer is a bit diffiult to respond to. Just for reference so I won't try to size it.