Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[alan]

Regarding DZ gen, the pdf recently posted states: 
it only rotates a magnetic field, you will not get much voltage with it as there's something else I kept secret. It's like an engine with no pistons, it won't start.



For who has the hardware: take an AC motor that uses a rotating field, replace rotor with a fixed 'partnered output coils' setup (pistons using magnetic force) on an iron core, load coils, power stator with AC, profit...? Lenz provides piston power.

[rakarskiy]

nix85,  I will note only the features:

All this can only be attached to generators where the magnetic flux from the field source crosses the conductor (conditionally, I say conditionally unipolar electromagnetic induction)
Its formula is:   E = B_mlv

In the stator slot and in the window of the transformer there is no relocation of the conductor by the magnetic lines, therefore a different form of electromagnetic induction operates there, which is calculated by the transformer formula:   E = 4.44Фf

the formula is transformer, but the principle of operation of a transformer and a generator is exactly the opposite. I have already installed this exactly.
In this video, the generator mode is just shown, although obviously the author himself does not suspect this.



The secret is very simple, you need a full and constant load.


все

[kolbacict]

One whole lamel divided in two ?
прикольно. I had not seen that yet.
And it becomes whole only when covered brush.

[nix85]

@rakarskiy And what kind of spinning generator did you see where wire does not cut the flux, it always does, iron core or not.

In all kinds of spinning generators, no matter which kind of winding is used, axial or radial, salient or non-salient, distributed or concentrated, flux sweeps across the wire cuts the flux. So you are wrong there.

What you wrote about two kinds of induction i have written many times already and to a far greater depth. First the distinction between flux cutting law E=Bvl and flux linking law E=NdΦ/dt (of which E = 4.44Фf is a derivation) i shared 3 years ago in thread linked below, and further division of induction into two distinct kinds Henry observed and PROVED, one weaker which cannot be screened except with iron and another that can be screened by any metal.

https://overunity.com/18391/two-kinds-of-induction-henry

This flux cutting formula is basically a variation of F = ILxB aka laplace's force i mentioned in last post aka the motor effect. As i have written in this thread of mine

F = ILxB force on a conductor in a magnetic field - laplace
as load increases, current in the conductor must increase to balance the forces: I = F/BL

And E = 4.44Фf formula for a transformer is as i said variation of Faraday's law of induction, and i shared it already multiple times

https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl/msg567952/#msg567952
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg577902/#msg577902

It is a well known fact that power in a transformer is proportional to flux time frequency according to a known formula for voltage across transformer primary or secondary is

E = 4.44 * number of turns * frequency * flux in the core

But for flux in the core to appear there first has to be current through the coil

This flux is proportional to input voltage and inversely proportional to frequency

E/f

Also what is shown in that video you shared where width of the secondary did not affect induction was known to me for years. Nothing strange about that.

Like i wrote in the linked Henry thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prXkW9l3MzM

We can see in the last video about leakage how guy explains flux prefers to loop on itself through the air, rather than go through the core surrounded by aluminum ring.

He clearly understands NOT, that this is very peculiar thing. Why would flux in the core care about a ring that is OUTSIDE of a core. This is the whole point.

Magnetic field is just an effect, ether is the true medium of transmission.

https://overunity.com/18391/two-kinds-of-induction-henry/msg541766/#msg541766

So i already shared all that and elaborated on all this in greater depth. I made it clear that the fact loop "knows" or "feels" the change of flux through it without a single line of flux cutting the wire PROVES induction is mediated through a higher order field, i suggest the A aka Vector field aka Aharonov–Bohm effect i spoke about countless times around here.

Now, as i have just proven, i have written here 3 years ago that flux cutting and flux linking are different phenomena and have further shared Henry's great work about even subtler division of induction into two different phenomena.

I have also shared Floyd Sweet's and Hooper's and others' work claiming the exactly same thing about MOTIONAL ELECTRIC FIELD etc.

They are all aspects of a single underlying phenomena, ALL is.

And it is very very important to seriously study Henry's two kinds of induction to get better understanding.

As for your claim "principle of operation of a transformer and a generator is exactly the opposite" that is simply wrong. And no, just having a wide secondary and full load is not the "secret".

The secret is to work around lenz, whichever kind of induction is at play.

Nix

[bistander]

One whole lamel divided in two ?
прикольно. I had not seen that yet.
And it becomes whole only when covered brush.

WTH?
(What is that?)
Source please. In English please? Perhaps explain relevance to topic.
Thanks.
bi