Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[hartiberlin]

Gentlemen,

Keep in mind "You have to be Good Stuards of your  technology!"

Like the Medical "Hipocratic Oath" - worldwide.

Consider the implications of your "Technology Developments."

E.G. - Don't come up with something that has the possibility of  "Burning
YOUR own, or any one elses, house down, or killing someone!"

Spend some time and do it RIGHT" ...

Losts of things to consider! (Ask the McDonalds "Hot Coffee" lady).

Just MHO. [see the "Caution" I posted]

SL

Hi SL,
what is the supposed principle. How bout CLARITY and TRANSPARENCY.
How about a clear answer what is the exact supposed principle, what is the use of centralcoils, where is the shielding etc.
How is it defing Lentz law and getting this way overunity ??
Can you please answer this ?
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

[Cadman]

He says it clearly in the patent. And he relates it to Faraday's homoplar generator.

"The back EMF or reverse torque of rotary generators in use today can best be described by reference to "Lenz's Law." It, in summary, states that when an EMF is generated by a change in magnetic flux according to Faraday's Law, the polarity of the induced EMF is such that it produces a current whose magnetic field opposes the magnetic flux which produces it. The induced magnetic field inside any loop of wire always acts to keep the magnetic flux in the loop constant. If the magnetic field B is increasing, the induced magnetic field acts in equal and opposite direction to it; if it is decreasing, the induced magnetic field acts in the direction of the applied field with equal force. In conventional generators, the rotor is stationed inside the coil loops of the stator and, thus, the rotor generates a current which in turn generates a magnetic field which is equal in force and opposite in polarity. Therefore, reverse torque is a product of the design.

In the case of the generators of the present disclosure, the rotors do not rotate; instead, the flux from the magnetic poles, in one embodiment, rotates and in another embodiment, transgresses laterally across the stationary "rotor'Varmature. Additionally, in one design, the rotors are outside of the coil loop and, therefore, do not interact with the induced pole. This induced pole is induced by current flow and is not responsible for a current flow, as is evidenced by the fact that the generator reaches full voltage prior to current going to an electrical load."

"Systems and methods for generation of direct current (DC) with reduced electromagnetic drag, commonly referred to as reverse torque, thereby improving the operating efficiency of a  generator"

"Removal of reverse torque from generators associated with converting mechanical energy into electrical power can provide an opportunity for an electrically powered power generator for a multitude of sizes and applications. Removal of the reverse torque allows a generator to operate with 400-500% increase in efficiency. This permits the opportunity to drive the generator with a smaller electric driver and, therefore, greatly improve the generator' s efficiency as well as allow for miniaturizing of a generator."

Thanks. That's what I said, or paraphrased. ... Removing the reverse torque from generators associated with converting mechanical energy into electrical... by driving the generator with a smaller electric driver... (instead of a motor)

That's not the same as reducing or removing the effects of lenz in the electrical or magnetic fields of the generator.

[nix85]

Thanks. That's what I said, or paraphrased. ... Removing the reverse torque from generators associated with converting mechanical energy into electrical... by driving the generator with a smaller electric driver... (instead of a motor)

That's not the same as reducing or removing the effects of lenz in the electrical or magnetic fields of the generator.

You're welcome. That IS the same as reducing the effects of lenz in the electrical or magnetic fields of the generator. Read, in the very first quoted sentence he clearly identifies reverse torque with lenz.

""The back EMF or reverse torque of rotary generators in use today can best be described by reference to "Lenz's Law.""

He says very clearly he is reducing lenz drag.

[Cadman]

Ok, so we agree then. The method he uses is to remove the drive motor from the generating system thus rendering that particular lenz/reverse torque effect moot.

[nix85]

No we do not agree, it seems you are intentionally trying to confuse to issue. Removing the drive motor does nothing to lenz. Relative motion of the magnetic field and coils is the same as in mechanical generator. Lenz is still 100% present.

His "implication" that lenz is reduced cause there is no mechanical rotation is as ridiculous as his claim that electrical steel magnifies the magnetic field "4-5 times" when it is 4-5 thousand times, as well as the claim that iron atom is a source of energy (lol).

He does not say how he reduces lenz, he only vaguely hints at it with

"In accordance with another aspect of the power generation, systems and methods are disclosed for reducing drag in an electric generator that includes a geometric design of the stator, placement of a unique series of "uni-polar" solid-state rotors in relation to the stator coils along with magnetic shielding which results in minimal destructive interaction of the rotor magnetic fields with the magnetic fields of the stator when the generator is connected to an electric load."