Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

A NOTE to anyone reading these forums who is concerned or afraid of:

"Being Misled"

Do your own detailed analysis - (much like rakarskiy and others have done) -
or hire a professional* to do it for you.

BTW, this is what many very successful investors, or developers, do every day,
especially if they are not intimately familiar with the technology.


Don't ever be "taken in" by those that claim  - "I don't want these few so
called experts to mislead others on these forum."- to be your "Protective Friend!"

This is even more valid when the so-called "protector" has no real knowledge
of the system under review or it's underlying technology.

Following their unimformed bias can be very costly in that their misleading non-sense
can result in a "high yield" lost opportunity, up front.

* A Professional will Analyze each individual element of the underlying claims and present you
with the 'actual' results, including detailed background and references, where required, in a
form that is fully understandable by you - the paying client. Of course the decision to move
forward is always yours - as an "informed" investor or developer...

If the "analysist" scoffs; "impossible, can't be done, etc." on it's face - move on immediately;
dont even try convincing this "technical expert" of the validity - it's dead before it even starts.
Like all professions; there are good ones and their bad ones - this one is bad, period.

Mindless chit-chat is cheap and abundant BUT an informed professional analysis,
by one skilled-in-the-art, is of great value!

[kolbacict]

Give your point of view - "why Holcomb system cannot work" - only by specifications, calculations and other verifiable methods.

Why does Dr. Holcomb have to prove anything to you personally?

I suppose official science has already proved the impossibility of a perpetual motion machine.
Moreover, they proved with all possible formulas, theories and experiments.
Now we have to prove that they are wrong and that our device is functional.
As they say in tennis, now is our serve. Or in chess, now it's our turn.
I haven't succeeded yet.    But I tried.

[SolarLab]

Hi TommeyReed,

After some "settling down on my part" I'll accept your challenge of a "build off."

However, let us look at this as a collaborative effort rather than a challenge.

Briefly; we need a device that can "wind coils" in a more efficient  manner (see the attachment below)
so we should attempt designing and building a device that can do that (I noticed you have fabricated
a wind device). Hand wound coils are very time consuming!

My "build off" proposal is this:

Fabricate a winding machine that can do an "Orthocyclic Method of Coil Winding" (described below).

Should you be interested in this cahllenge, we can arrange funding, etc. (you keep all rights, etc.) and
we will license the design from you; plus, the project will be funded by our group (Cost Plus if need be;
within reason of course).

PM me with your poposal (but do not include details of how you would technically achieve this prior to
executing a non-disclosure).

A typical method might involve using "Open Builds" components and a "Flowcode v10" controller. Keep
in mind that the "Coils" are rectangular (both Pole and Lap) to suite the LinGen V1.0, however the
physical shape should be configurable to meet future designs.

Best Regards,

Solarlab

Hi TommyReed, et. al.

Is the "build-off challenge" to fabricate an "Orthocyclic" Coil Winder now Off-the-Table?

Hope not - there are some pretty decent ideas that have come to light after a few discussions
that look quite achievable at moderate cost and effort.

Please let me know when you get a chance, if your still interested.

Would like to get the ball rolling on this one (some good $$ are involved). Of course it can be
done in-house but I  thought you might be interested since you brought the design challenge up.

No big deal, either way, but it looks to be a pretty decent design challenge that everyone might
find useful. A good low cost universal coil winder is always useful IMHO! Especially if it can deliver
an "F" near 1 with constant results.

Anyway, please let me know so I can proceed accordingly. Same stipulations apply but can be
amended to suit your requirements.

NOTE: if anyone else is interested please let me know! The offer stands to everyone but the
fuse is getting short.

Thanks, (pretty sure that once you get involved with the group you'll find it quite rewarding)

SL

[rakarskiy]

I suppose official science has already proved the impossibility of a perpetual motion machine.
Moreover, they proved with all possible formulas, theories and experiments.
Now we have to prove that they are wrong and that our device is functional.
As they say in tennis, now is our serve. Or in chess, now it's our turn.
I haven't succeeded yet.    But I tried.

Do you know the parameters of the "perpetual motion machine"? Does science know?

You have the OverUnity effects before your eyes: 1) Magnetic field of a permanent magnet and 2) Magnetic field amplification in ferromagnetic materials. But science morons and their adepts are carefully avoiding these phenomena.

The official science (for sheep) has defined the action of a magnet as a "residual magnetic field" without explaining its nature, and the action of a magnet is the generation of a field caused by a primary (one-time) electromagnetic impulse, of greater magnitude in most cases. So is the technology, the excitation of a magnet by a stronger magnet.

So your science has not defined anything, but only ordered to be a herd.

[SolarLab]

Hi TommyReed, et. al. 

Sorry, forgot to mention the "Orthocyclic Winder RFP" closes on Wednesday, 12th of July at 12:00 GMT.

So don't hesitate to at least register your intent to reply via PM.

SL