Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Just another Don Smith thread

Started by nix85, April 11, 2022, 10:54:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nix85

Don talking about his matchbox device outputting megawatts.

https://youtu.be/40u7oNaVajE?t=8110

I would bet it is carbon based rod, with some exotic metals, baked/pressed in special way, started with a pulse and go. James Schwartz used carbon based 'neutrino rods'. Beware he lied about 72-73 elements, it's really much simpler.

I wrote email to Schwartz few years ago asking him nicely for secret of the rods, no response. Then i wrote another email accusing him of stealing the idea. Imagine, then he responded :) But of course, did not reveal anything.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ko6IGPH7lo

He got max 300w out of each rod pair, which is pretty good. Strange he abandoned this for more complex and not much better output approach.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwsapvCcYCY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFqwY8q-5ZE

AlienGrey

Quote from: whitelightningwizard on May 22, 2022, 04:07:20 PM
Ok  :)

well...

no more tripe from ME then !  ;D

ON HERE this is no place for actual discussion, only playground for argument (polemics).
am sadly disappointed.

wlw
What is tripe ? a fish or verbal diarrhea ? ether way it's a wast of space !
do you think we can stick to the normality reality ?
Sil

nix85

Another gem he/she parroted "middle of magnet is NOTHING"

Middle of magnet is not nothing....
Flux is strongest at the center of the magnet/coil, force
at the center becomes zero cause ferromagnetic object
at the center experiences the same parallel flux with
it's whole volume (or diverging flux equally on both
sides - if object is larger). This is how plunger works,
why piece of iron is sucked into the center of the coil
cause that is the state of lowest energy.

https://youtu.be/Sq-CYfp9t4c?t=18

Force can exist only when there is imbalance of flux.
If ferromagnetic object is immersed in uniform or
symmetrical flux no force acts on it.

Vortex 22

Hi there!

Don Smith was never wrong! read his pdf again there still lies a hidden secret but u have to guess! its there but its hard for everyone to find. go thru it and u will get it. Don Smith wanted us to learn deeper and then apply. Smith wanted us to use our minds. not just make us dumb
followers. I found it and used it and so will each one at this Forum. and the power s all urz for
free. Kapanadze is one Guy who found it and used it. Sr193 followed suite of kapanadze. but hisoutput i dont think is 50 hz.
and same applies to kapagen.

Regards

nix85

@wlw Ehh. Your confusion stems from not knowing the simple fact that gravitational fields keep everything together, from nanoscopic to universal, not some imaginary weak and strong nuclear force or Coulomb force.

If you knew this, you would know why similarly charged atoms can stick together, why electron does not fall into proton or why a planet does not fall into sun and you would not be confused :P

This does not mean Coulomb's law is wrong. Same charges indeed repel and opposite attract. But that as all laws is general approximation valid for certain set of parameters. Like i mentioned before two electrons in a superconductor lattice can join into a Cooper pair etc. Two hydrogen atoms can form a molecule H2 etc. You try to 'explain' this by saying that same poles attract while answer is in fact in GRAVITY.

if you read and understood Zirbes' book you would know this. Look again at the core of our sun, we see there are 9 huge bodies spinning in same direction. Magnetic and gravitational REPULSION between them is beyond description, yet they are kept together by the joint gravitational field they generate. This is the secret to it ALL.

There are 4 forces stemming from One Force, represented by the swastika,
ancients called them 4 Great Builders/Architects. The Four Forces are:

Static-Magnetic Field (SM), as in a bar magnet;
Electro-Static Field (ES), as in a charged capacitor;
Electro-Magnetic Wave (EM), as radio waves, light, heat, etc.;
Resonating Electromagnetic Field (RMF), like that of all celestial bodies
(operating in a vortex), space craft propulsion field, the basis of life,
the elemental life.

RMF (gravity) being the highest/fastest. It's a push pull field. Even Tesla discovered this by accident when he put his hand on the axis of his 30kV DC generator spinning at very high RPM, on one side his hand was PULLED IN on another PUSHED OUT, this is not electrostatic force which is orders of magnitude too weak to account for this, this is gravitational DIPOLE, just like that of a planet or a spacecraft.

As for magnets, what a mess you made, my my.

When we put magnets together we gain energy when we pull em apart we lose. (not necessarily but that is another subject)....

Point is flux is max at the center NOT zero. Visualize it in steps. You are putting two magnets together, as you let 'em approach flux lines merge more and more, attraction becomes huge, flux density is INCREASING between them. Then you finally let them touch (nothing really touches), all flux lines have merged. You think all that flux magically disappears and if you pull them apart a bit it magically reappears. Do you see how unrealistic you are. Just realize they never really touch and flux never disappears. Flux between them is huge.

To understand magnetism first read Leedskalnin's book. Then you will not make such basic errors.

https://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Edward-Leedskalnin-Magnetic-Current.pdf

As Leedskalnin correctly says there is a SUBSTANCE flowing in the magnetic field lines, tiny individual N and S monopoles and it is a TWO-WAY STREAM.

If we have a single coil generating a magnetic dipole, WHERE ARE THE "POLES". Wherever you want to draw an IMAGINARY line. You can call it a "pole" when lines start to diverge a little, or maybe little more... There are no "poles", it is an arbitrary, imaginary division, natural shape of a magnetic field is a TOROID, toroid has no poles, no center, no beginning or end!! If you break it apart you get "poles" but this is just a POLE-LESS toroid field opened up.

If you have a coil individual turns DO repel because flux is in opposite direction between the turns so it cancels out. However, again, PM is NOT a coil, it is made of many tiny PMs and they do NOT repel.

Center of a magnet/coil is NOT a "BLOCH WALL", stop misusing the term.

Again, bloch wall is boundary where domains change polarity, domains in the magnet are ALL IN SAME DIRECTION, on "N" and "S" side.

"If we look inside a magnet, zooming in with a microscope, we find no physical difference between the little bits of magnet at the north pole compared to the little bits of magnet at the south pole.  It all looks the same. There are no physical differences between the top and bottom halves of the magnet.

[...]

If we slice one of those D4X0-ND cylinder magnets down the middle and map it with an electron microscope, the pattern of grains with their magnetization direction all point in roughly the same direction, parallel to the axis of the cylinder.  (That's why we call it axially magnetized.)"

THERE ARE NO POLES article

https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=there-are-no-poles

Like everything you got it in reverse, in REALITY every answer has a question.
God perspective is the ONLY true perspective.

And no, i am not being rude to you if anyone is being rude it's you.

It's funny you think you're sharing :) My my. For your own good, it would be better if you tame that wild nature of yours and for once LEARN.