WTP Patent Pending Broadcast Free Energy 200 Mile Radius from Tower

[stivep]

The quoted text below was trimmed to its basic logical meaning:

I looked at Nikola Tesla 1902 experiments  on Long Island :
Electricity can be broadcast //a long distance //;


I made a break through.
the patent I am receiving (applied for and to be delivered shortly) explains how real WTP works in what we have calculated to be 20MW of power broadcast on a carrier wave reaching at least for a 200 mile radius.

I understand that you filed patent application.
Please provide a patent application number.

Tesla made two //mistakes at Wardenclyffe Tower in 1901-1902. 
I corrected Tesla mistakes// by removing the oscillator idea entirely.  and corrected  tower orientation for WTP  so the tower has to operate as though//- it is part of the magnetosphere and become an electromagnet itself.

And this patent would not work without one over riding principle no one knew then and have no idea now what is wrong using electrons to attempt a broadcast.  Simply stated, the electron is too passive to broadcast.  One must find a way to modify the electron that it flies off the broadcast tower at the speed of light.  That I do by looking at the Lepton classification of preparticles.  Please note that the Muon is included.

please provide your own definition of pre-particles
https://energywavetheory.com/subatomic-particles/periodic-table-of-particles/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon

The muon is one of these fundamental particles; it's similar to the electron, but more than 200 times heavier.

I won't tell you now how I convert electrons to muons now,
a muon because it is primarily an anitgravity preparticle and that mimics the idea of prematter enough it is not visible.

All of the forces we experience every day can be reduced to just four categories:
gravity,
electromagnetism,
the strong force
and the weak force.
https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677

results from the Muon g-2 experiment don't add up to a conclusive discovery yet.

please provide your own definition of prematter.

muon, we have discovered, carries the amperage of the electron but not the voltage. 
When the muon strikes a house antenna to receive WTP, the muon converts immediately back to an electron and powers the entire house easily through existing wiring.
am open to discussions and questions on this as you may wish.  Thank you.

RB

I am completely confused with language used by you.
Voltage is a potential (potential difference expressed in volts: )
and current can only flow if there is difference of potential.

An electric current can
only flow when there is
a closed path in which
electrons can move
https://www.marlingtonlocal.org/Downloads/20-2%20ppt.pdf
https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/93793/excerpt/9780521593793_excerpt.pdf

Wesley

[stivep]

We create more energy than we use.  And I hope the attached graphic is helpful to you.  Thank you for your response.

you will never produce more energy than you use.
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed
The First Law of Thermodynamics

in regards to the graphics posted by you,  I'm giving you video of one of the icons of free energy
Eric Dollard.
Peter Lindemann and Eric Dollard casually discuss the possibilities of Chris Carson's rotating capacitor. 
That of course doesn't mean that I support and agree with the statements from the video.

Chris Carson's Parametric Rotary Electrostatic Converter 2019-09-01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6K-fZAXT_A

the only way you can have more energy at output then  delivered an input is when:
-you couple into another energy source by process of energy conversion.
The simplest example of it is:
pipe connected to the river has installed valve.
You can use small energy to open the valve .
Now we have free energy paid by that the river flow.
Wesley

[Ronald Besser]

Hello Stivep,

Thank you for the points made.  I will answer them the best I can.

First my attorney (Ream/Ottawa, Kansas) never provided me that number.  I do not know what it is.  It was applied for in December 2021, and the attorney indicates they have processed it but not released it.  I expect it momentarily.


Here are the definitions I work with that helped my invent the way to make free energy flow:

Prematter does not exist in time-space.  Prematter is spaceless and takes it origins the same place Albert Einstein calculated for it not knowing precisely what he was dealing with, but he felt it was ubiquitous enough to always correct for its force over long-distance observations.  Since the force can deflect light it can also mutate energy fields ( call them force fields if you like) into distinct forms for the materialization of matter in time and space.  By definition, prematter has no electrical qualifications, no mathematical quantities,  nor does it promote quanta or is it sufficiently exact to provide its use.  Essentially, prematter is an energy pattern pressed out into time-space for the evolution of matter into some visible of solid form of objects or sometimes simply as cosmic rays or cosmic effusion.

Electrons use prematter to form their measurable presence by bonding 100 prematter units into one cohesive whole.  My graphic that shows the white does superimposes white dots I put on it to show the presence of prematter units inside the presence of an electron.  Since they are prematter you can never see them or can you count them as I have.

For that reason, I have classified the electron as the first unit of basic matter in time space and assign it 100 prematter sparks.  All other preparticles should be compared to the electron to know what classification of preparticle they are.  All of the Leptons, and there are really six preparticles not four as current physics defines them.  The four leptons are the pion, the electron, the muon, and the thermodynamic tachyon.  The two additional ones are preparticles classified as Bosons and I am over my head to define all of the reasons but a Boson is a dead squirrel so to speak in that it looks like a Boson but is really is a Lepton with an enormous tail masquerading as a Boson.  By induction logic the Proton has 53 prematter sparks of a different nature formation than the electron prematter sparks.

Prematter is not our reality but it is prematter that contains force energy which bonds together to form bodies of preparticles and lots of other things not discussed here.  Its source is the Einstein Unqualified Absolute and that is an existential source creating the source of infinity.  But we see only the effects as we do the electron it creates by bonding 100 pieces of itself inside.  The string theory enthusiasts would go bright eyed if they knew that the prematter Ultimaton has strings in its spark which wraps and glues itself in all preparticles but each preparticle has a different number of Ultimatons too.


Definition of Preparticle


I think physics will have to redefine this themselves when they see this invention working.  I do not use the standards because they hinder investigation by announcing characteristics that, while they are true, are also insufficient.

The Electron has 5 sub-elements never hinted at before by science.   1 - it contains substrates known glormans (my name for something never named before) which are abstracts of the temperance of the electron to phase itself in and out of reality as they are famous for suddenly disappearing and reappearing somewhere else;  2 - the electron has nine different patterns to materialize in, and that will never be told here;  3 - It also contains nine different forms of electronic pre-sparks (all prematter but differentiated into various substrate categories such as tall defined (height of the preparticle); such as withers (width of the particle);  and valence determination constituencies; and several more so obtuse I let them alone for now.

The preparticle is also defined as having all the properties ascribed by science plus many more.  Not all preparticles are destined for atoms either.  All electrons are so destined in one form or another but the Graviton is an excellent example of a preparticle designed to work on  huge planets like Jupiter to keep them from imploding and work to keep their surface convex and not to fall victim to the hollow cheek appearance.  The Photon is a preparticle but is the one exception to a general definition of a preparticle either because it is too fast or because it is too small.

One last important thing to consider, and that is we do produce more energy than we initially use out of the Magnetosphere.  If you notice on the drawing with Reddy Kilowatt shown above, there are two normal generators at work before it goes to a box called a condensor /transducer.  That is where we take an ordinary electron, break off an Ultimaton and throw it to the wind, and then mother nature redesigns the electron into the never-to-see Muon.  We do not broadcast electrons-- they are not broadcast-able.   Funny thing about the Muon is that when you hurl it off a tower top, it forms its own carrier wave, and that is your path of energy conversion.  We can broadcast Muons at a frequency of 86.4 MHz.  Thanks to the ability of the Muon to form its own carrier wave, we estimate we add nearly 6% more energy to broadcast than we take from the electrons out of the Magnetosphere.

There is a huge amount more of new information going to come out of this when we build the plant and demonstrate how well this works. 

I thank you for your references and your questions and interest.   Ask away for this should open more questions than it answers.

RB

[stivep]

The quoted text below was trimmed to its basic logical meaning:

I will answer them the best I can.

First my attorney (Ream/Ottawa, Kansas) never provided me that number. 
I do not know what it is. 
It  applied for in December 2021,
the attorney indicates they have processed it but not released it. 
I expect it momentarily.

I understand that English is likely not your primary language.
I understand that you have no patent pending nor provisional patent application.
I understand that no patent attorney wants to work for free and by that he's obligated to answer your questions.
I understand that you have no knowledge, and not even you look online at intellectual property protection and its proceedings.
https://www.upcounsel.com/patent-requirements
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
_____________________________________________

Here are the definitions I work with that helped my invent the way to make free energy flow:
Definition of Prematter
-does not exist in time-space//
is spaceless , // can deflect light // can also mutate energy fields
has no electrical qualifications, no mathematical quantities,
is an energy pattern pressed out into time-space for the evolution of matter into some visible of solid form of objects or sometimes simply as cosmic rays or cosmic effusion.

Electrons use prematter to form their measurable presence by bonding 100 prematter units into one cohesive whole. 
//electron as the first unit of basic matter in time space and assign it 100 prematter sparks.

Definition of Preparticle
I think physics will have to redefine this themselves when they see this invention working. 
I do not use the standards because they hinder investigation by announcing characteristics that, while they are true, are also insufficient.

I got lost.
Statement:

_{A physics-based model is a representation of the governing laws of nature that innately embeds the concepts of time, space, causality and generalizability.
These laws of nature define how physical, chemical, biological and geological processes evolve.Author: Karen E. Willcox, Omar Ghattas, Patrick Heimbach}

_________________________________________________________
Summary conclusions

expectations:
1.please provide, established existing models in physics that are applied to phenomena in question mentioned by you.
  please provide links to that related models in scientifically respected literature.

2.is any theoretical novelty proposed by you related to any published articles in approved and scientifically respected literature.

3.

_{Ronald BesserL
Electrons use prematter to form their measurable presence by bonding 100 prematter units into one cohesive whole. 
//electron as the first unit of basic matter in time space and assign it 100 prematter sparks.}

<sub>why is 100 units not 101?
what is the difference between 100 prematter sparks and 100 prematter units?


_________________________________________________________
your response is not in the brackets of known physical models.
You introduced or postulated physical process and application that serves your desire and has nothing to do with established in physics methods of analysis.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.</sub>
Wesley

[Ronald Besser]

 StiveP, thank you for your comments.

I am unable to process your response.  I do have a patent pending.  My attorney is listed by name and geography for you in my response to you earlier.

Please understand that I cannot offer you a working model for free energy if anyone persists in insisting on a standard model of physics.  The whole reason America has not learned to use free energy is that science is crystalized on a so-called standard physics model.  Such a model is not only outdated; in some cases it is just plain wrong, and the process to find free electricity is also wrong by the majority of people working on it.  I have shown you the problem with the standard model of approach and the physics it employees.  Let me relist such for you:

1 - Stop trying to use oscillators; they do not provide a broadcasting tower for free energy but the wrong preparticle and those electrons just fall off the tower.  One cannot get them up the tower leg ever because the magnetosphere presses the electrons off to ground them instead to broadcast them; 

2 - To provide broadcast of great distance of free electricity off a tower, one must use what the Magnetosphere uses to produce visible electricity such as lightning.  Lightning is derived from three sources in the magnetosphere and science has a good idea how that is done, but science does not understand, the new free energy power plant has to produce its own lightning, and visible lightning is never out of electrons directly.  Lightning strikes are derived from free Muon preparticles and super storms at about 30,000 feet tops or more, produce vivid Lightning by induction of the Tachyon.  The point is any electric plant using the Magnetosphere must reproduce it in its generators first and then belt the tower with muon lightning to the top for distribution;

3 -  The Magnetosphere consistently produces 1 megawatt of electricity sustainable at all times.  That sustained production can be tapped into a receiving river using an induction sphere located in the center of our tower.  Look at the Reddy Kilowatt graphic above.   It gathers free electrons at prodigious rates and feeds the buried cable that connects to the generators.   We use the energy of the magnetosphere as seed energy and supplement the seed energy with generation of more dynamo power.  The transducer is also a slave generator.  The slave acts as a subtle oscillator but is forced to produce muons, not electrons.  The slave also performs somethin like the thrust from a jet engine to flash energy to the top of the broadcast tower;

It is useless to attempt to apply the Tesla idea of an aether to properly produce free energy and broadcast it a far distance.  Today science calls the induction of electricity, such as placing a pad underneath and electric car to charge its batteries.  Such a device can do that, but it is the wrong idea to produce free electricity to everyone in a 200 mile transmissible mode.  The reason is that the pad under the car only has to travel feet and the manufacture can be successful to do that but that is not a good definition of WTP.  What that manufacture is doing is called electron induction and not wireless electricity.  That might sound like splitting hair to you, but we have to do more than split hairs to get away from the Tesla errors concerning actual electricity broadcasts.

4 - Finally, please understand that the people who work with preparticles are not fully doing their homework.  The definition of a Quark is not really correct.  A Quark runs the electronics of a preparticle and not the other way around.  The seven types of Quarks are relative minor compared to the power of an electron, but the electron unbeknown to the standard model has an attached Quark of the Up-Down variety, and all electrons depend on the Up-Down Quark to revivify its energy for whatever reason it may be drawn upon.  The Quark assumes the position almost like a tiny moon and orbits the electron until the electron is declassified as a preparticle and departs grounded.  You might call the orbiting Quark a soldier defending the integrity of an electron for all the work it has to do to produce an extraordinary amount of quanta for its size.

5 - I am a student of good English as well and insist that how something is said is as precise as possible.  The ability of this invention will produce a new understanding of physics.  I did not start out doing it for any purpose other than to understand why Tesla failed.  Now I know why Tesla failed,  but those who admire these ideas by Tesla ideas merely perpetuate his errors and a few simple corrections to his process will result in a satisfactory performance by produce renewable energy and forever be rid of carbon based fuels for all transportation and more.

Thank you.

RB