magnetic gear paradox

[citfta]

Well I DON"T see anything unusual about what has been shown.  The number of turns each gear makes is determined by the number of magnets on each.  I don't see any difference between that and a couple of gears.  The ration of gear teeth between the gears determines the ratio of turns between them.  The only difference is that because the gears have to mesh with each other the diameter of gears has to be correct.  But with magnets the diameter doesn't matter as much but the ratio of magnets still determines the ratio of turns between the gears.  I don't see that as having any bearing on the efficiency of either system.  But I don't see any slippage involved or gain of efficiency either.


Respectfully,
Carroll

[r2fpl]

I don't see any performance gain here either.
Slippage may not be the right description, but I couldn't think of anything else to describe it.

[kolbacict]

How many times can I tell you, you will speed up the rotation of the virtual Holcomb magnetic field with this magnetic gear.
If the EMF on the secondary winding is proportional to the speed of rotation, and from nothing else, you will get a multiple increase in power out of nothing.
And even if something will be a little slips  there.
Why hasn't anyone tried this yet?
I dont have an opportunity do it.

[r2fpl]

ok. Answer me the question: is the power on each of these wheels the same? maybe they are different?
Of course, increasing the amplitude will increase the power but not without a fee. Speed alone is not enough to equal power, right? You can always check it too.

[kolbacict]

Yes, but I was told here on the forum that the consumption from the power source does not increase with increasing frequency ...