Redefining Reactance in Terms of Relativity

[Vinyasi]

Free Energy is an over-reactance of electricity and magnetism whose consequence is the negative impedance of Foster's reactance theorem in which a passive set of capacitors prismatically refract [FN1] real power through themselves resulting in a conversion of a portion of that real power into a reactance which does not equal the input of real power. This conversion may be greater than its input of real power, or it may be less than. Regardless, ...

This capacitive over-reactance, or under-reactance, makes it possible for coils to become generators (or, aetheric sponges) without having to become activated via an external prime mover, nor having to resort to thermodynamics to explain the disappearance of energy. Instead, especially in the case of overunity, the background voltage potential of the environment is sufficient enough to catalyze an overunity circuit (of multiple capacitances and multiple inductances) into shifting that circuit's perception of the quantity of energy (which it was, or is, given) into a conversion of perspective resulting in the actual magnification, or reduction, of energy after a period of time has elapsed or else is instantaneous.

We've been fooled into paying attention to the detail of the creation or destruction of energy. Not only does it never occur, but it is not relevant. Only, perspective is relevant. And perspective is predicated upon a stable frame of reference which relativity has already spelled out can be variable when time is variant according to Noether's Theorem.

"systems that are [...] variant under shifts in time [...] do not exhibit conservation of energy"

The possibility for the variability of a temporal reference frame alters energy without violating physics since no creation, nor destruction, is involved.

But, it doesn't end here.

Time is not the only frame of reference which must remain stable (continuous) to prevent alterations of energy. All of the other factors, which are specific to reactance, must also remain stable...and they don't! Mutual inductance causes the fields of individual self-inductances to vary as a byproduct of their mutual association with one another despite the physical objects (coils) which initiated these fields of inductance remain stable. The same can be said of mutual capacitance.

BTW, mutual capacitance is the multiplicative reciprocal of mutual inductance. In other words, whenever a magnetic coupling between two or more coils is low, their mutual capacitance is high. Conversely, whenever their magnetic coupling is high, their mutual capacitance is low.

For example, ...
Instead of predicating our measurement of speed upon time, alone (miles per hour), we must also include miles per capacitance and miles per inductance and miles per cycles per second, etc., and that merely covers electrical reactance while ignoring the additional factors of magnetic reactance.

Energy, as real power, must be measured in terms of all of the factors of reactance. This serves as the *complete* and *wholistic* frame of reference for measuring energy due to the slightly complicated relativity of our measurement of energy. Time, alone, is not the only leverage to alter energy without violating physics. All of reactance is also involved. This is due to time being generic to reactance without specifying which one: electrical or magnetic.

Just as time, alone, cannot be held to be the only variable of reactance, likewise it cannot be the only variable upon which the conservation of energy can become nullified. The conjoint efforts of: capacitance, and inductance, and the extreme 180 degree phase separation between voltage and current, plus their frequencies, are also involved in addition to all of the factors of magnetic reactance in nullifying conservation of energy.

Relativity makes this generically possible while reactance spells out the details. There is no quantum mysticism, here.

[FN1] = The square root of the dielectric constant of a dielectric material, sandwiched within a capacitor, is equal to the refractive index of that non-magnetic material.

Gravity Control with Present Technology by David Alzofon and Frederick Alzofon - page 100 ...

"everything which exists boils down to just two realities: radiation and matter"

I beg to differ...

My first response to Frederick Alzofon's Unified Field Theory

[partzman]

Vinyasi,

Nice post but I wonder if your logic is correct in your following statement-

"BTW, mutual capacitance is the multiplicative reciprocal of mutual inductance. In other words, whenever a magnetic coupling between two or more coils is low, their mutual capacitance is high. Conversely, whenever their magnetic coupling is high, their mutual capacitance is low."

When the mutual coupling or k factor is low, usually the coils are separated by some distance on the core and the resulting capacitive coupling would also be low.  The opposite would then be true for a high k factor would it not?

Regards,
Pm

[Vinyasi]

Vinyasi,

Nice post but I wonder if your logic is correct in your following statement-

"BTW, mutual capacitance is the multiplicative reciprocal of mutual inductance. In other words, whenever a magnetic coupling between two or more coils is low, their mutual capacitance is high. Conversely, whenever their magnetic coupling is high, their mutual capacitance is low."

When the mutual coupling or k factor is low, usually the coils are separated by some distance on the core and the resulting capacitive coupling would also be low.  The opposite would then be true for a high k factor would it not?

Regards,
Pm

What k factor are you referring to? I am thinking of ridiculously low values of 1%, or 1ppt, or 1ppm, or 1ppb, etc. I don't think it would be appropriate to consider that two or more coils would remain wrapped around a common core at such extreme values of low coupling. Instead, they would be separated by several meters or kilometers, or more.

Sorry, for not making myself more clear. 

[Vinyasi]

Overunity is the retention of reactive power at a rate which is faster than its loss and conversion into real power. And since reactive power is useless, ie. lossless, it cannot be lost or spent without its conversion into real power and, thus, cannot be conserved. Only real power is a conservable quantity in contrast to reactive power which can be synthesized from the square root of negative one. Reactive power accumulates just by its retention, alone. Only rarely is the injection of reactive power required to initiate and/or maintain a free energy process if certain principles are adhered to, namely: an open transmission line terminated by a self-short. The former retains the buildup of reactive voltage while the latter retains the buildup of reactive current.

But, once in a while, the synthesis of reactive power is required to initiate or maintain an overunity condition.

The synthesis of reactive power is the reversal of current per cycle of oscillation spawning negative watts. This is also the reversal of the direction for time of energy's frame of reference when this phenomenon is viewed from our perspective, but not from the point of view of energy's frame of reference. From energy's vantage point, time remains moving in a forward direction and, thus, is not violating the Law of Conservation if (indeed) it is a Law of physics.

The Relativity of Energy and the Reversal of Time is a Shift in Perspective - YouTube

But the audio of the original is superior ...

How to Build an Overunity Device - 30% audio. - YouTube

These presentations are companion pieces to the paper which I submitted to this conference on the topic of how Relativity explains Free Energy and Overunity by describing it as the accumulation of Reactive Power and the injection of transient surges which, by their very nature, are evidence of Time Going Backwards for Energy when viewed from Our Perspective ...

The Relativity of Energy and the Reversal of Time is a Shift in Perspective (ijcionline.com)

Thus, free energy in particular, and energy in general, expands and contracts as a consequence of a shift in perspective. But, reactance makes this bidirectional conversion possible, namely: the square root of negative one is the mysterious method whereby energy is ultimately created and destroyed.

Thank you, Eric Dollard, for making it easier to understand electrical energy from a layman's perspective.

In retrospect, it could be postulated that the square root of negative one is an ambiguous condition for the direction of time.

http://vinyasi.info/mhoslaw/Parametric%20Transformers/2023/Mar/dumbell_iron+spark.zip

[Dog-One]

In retrospect, it could be postulated that the square root of negative one is an ambiguous condition for the direction of time.

It could also be that "time" is just an artifact of a tempic or chrono field.
That mysterious third field everyone assumes is nice and steady and that
is so smooth and uniform we can build crystal oscillators that work
identically any place on the globe or in space around the globe.  It's
like sunlight when you are floating in space without any obstructions.
I think the reality is, it is in fact a field, just as W.B. Smith stated.
Regardless of how much we refuse to accept it, there are three fields:
Tempic, Electric and Magnetic -- gradient, divergence and curl.
And being a third field that operates orthogonal to the electric and
magnetic fields, we don't consider this field can be manipulated
just as readily as the other two fields.  I'm rather certain life outside
this solar system is well aware what would be required to visit here
if it were not.

For now, we use time even though I'm quite certain the Tempic
field should be considered a three dimensional vector.  What is the
most primitive passive means of manipulating time?  Yes, the
transmission line.  We know it is relatively simple to setup standing
waves within these components.  Most engineers go out of their way
to avoid standing waves within a transmission line.  I think this is
fine for signal transmission, but entirely incorrect for energy extraction.
I've been convinced for quite a while now, this is the component we
need to focus on.  We need to intentionally build standing waves within
a transmission line by causing impulse disruptions at anti-node points.
Time is the key to extracting energy, it's the one field we really haven't
mastered at all.  It's how you actually tie a gordian knot.